;This is an example program demonstrating
;how the `?:` operator in jumps, supposedly
;enabled in v5.2.1, doesn't really work as
;intended.

address 0
jump PicoBlaze_Simulator_in_JS ? code_that_should_run_in_browser : code_that_should_run_on_mobile
load s0, 0
code_that_should_run_on_mobile:
load s0, 1
jump end_of_branching
code_that_should_run_in_browser:
load s0, 2
jump end_of_branching
end_of_branching:

;The 7th line doesn't assemble. The assembler
;asks the user `Instead of 
;"code_that_should_run_in_browser", in the
;line #7, did you perhaps mean 
;"PicoBlaze_Simulator_in_JS"?`. It has to do
;with the way the assembler is structured
;internally. Namely, when the core of the
;assembler sees the "jump" instruction, it
;invokes the "getLabelAddress" method of the
;"TreeNode" class. However, when that method
;sees that it's being invoked on an `?:`
;operator, it wrongly assumes that all of its
;operands are arithmetic expressions, so
;it invokes the 
;"interpretAsArithmeticExpression" method.
;That method takes as the only argument the
;"constants" argument, and it has no access
;to the labels. There doesn't seem to be
;a simple solution.