Skip to content

Feature: less_than, greater_than only supported for numeric types #128

@strangemonad

Description

@strangemonad

It was surprising to me that is_less_than etc were part of the numeric mix-ins and not part of a more general ordering mix-ins. Many types can be ordered with some combination of __lt__, __gt_, etc magic methods plus functools.total_ordering. I would even suggest that checking that the types of the left-hand and right-hand sides be left up to the the magic method implementation (e.g. a custom _lt_ implementation can check that other matches a supported type or dynamically lookup other's fields).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions