Choose a easyconfig from a PR#1132
Conversation
eb --from-pr XX file.eb now works. It will only install the file.eb easyconfig but using all deps in the PR.
|
Test FAILed. |
|
Test FAILed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Very nice PR, thanks for the contribution! and reviewed visually by now.
For my curiosity: the above line is only a difference in syntactic sugar or, there is some other semantic aspect to it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
pep8 was complaining that the proper way to do this is not in.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@wpoely86: OK, I think from your part well done and said.
If anyone knows why pep8 triggered the warning, it would be nice to know;
perhaps code maintainability as such an expression may perhaps grow later on...?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@fgeorgatos: I think it's about interpreting the code. not x in xs could be interpreted as not (x in xs) or (not x) in xs. You don't have that problem with x not in xs.
change semantics w.r.t. synergy between --from-pr and specified easyconfigs
|
current behaviour: |
|
Test PASSed. |
|
Looking great now, Jenkins is happy, so going in. Thanks @wpoely86! |
eb --from-pr XX file.eb now works. It will only install the file.eb
easyconfig but using all deps in the PR.