Skip to content

evaluate

Directory actions

More options

Directory actions

More options

Latest commit

 

History

History

evaluate

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

parent directory

..
compute_scores
compute_scores
 
 
generate_judgements
generate_judgements
 
 
README.md
README.md
 
 

README.md

MMRB2 Evaluation

This directory contains evaluation scripts for the MMRB2 benchmark.

Structure

evaluate/
├── generate_judgements/      # Part 1: Generate judgements using LLM judges
│   ├── evaluate.py           # Single-process evaluation
│   ├── multi_gpu_evaluate.py # Multi-GPU/process evaluation
│   ├── run_gpt4o.sh          # GPT-4o script
│   ├── run_gemini25flash.sh  # Gemini 2.5 Flash script
│   ├── run_qwen3.sh          # Qwen3-VL-8B script
│   └── outputs/              # Sample outputs
└── compute_scores/           # Part 2: Compute accuracy from judgement files
    └── compute_accuracy.py   # Scoring script

Part 1: Generate Judgements (optional)

Generate pairwise judgements using any reward models. We provide example implementations for a few multimodal LLM-as-a-judge, but you can easily add your own LLM as the base model for judges.

Note that you don't necessarily need an LLM-as-a-judge, you can also use any other models, as long as you process the results in the correct format. Here we mainly provide the codes for using any LLM as judge.

Example Evaluators

Evaluator Type Description
gpt4o-pairwise API GPT-4o via OpenAI
gemini25flash-pairwise API Gemini 2.5 Flash
qwen3vl8b-pairwise Local Qwen3-VL-8B (requires GPU)

Requirements

torch>=2.8.0
transformers>=4.57.1
openai>=1.98.0
google-generativeai>=0.3.0
google-genai>=1.28.0
json-repair
tqdm
Pillow

Setup

Set up API keys via environment variables:

# For OpenAI:
export OPENAI_API_KEY="your-openai-api-key"

# For Google:
export GOOGLE_API_KEY="your-google-api-key"

Run evaluation:

cd generate_judgements

# Run GPT-4o evaluation
./run_gpt4o.sh

# Or run Gemini 2.5 Flash
./run_gemini25flash.sh

# Or run local Qwen3 (requires 8 GPUs)
./run_qwen3.sh

Manual Usage

# Run API models in 32 processes
python multi_gpu_evaluate.py \
    --evaluator_name gpt4o-pairwise \
    --task_type image \
    --pairs_path /path/to/t2i.json \
    --output_path ./outputs/task1_gpt4o-pairwise.json \
    --n_gpu 32

# Multi-process (8 parallel workers, each on one GPU)
python multi_gpu_evaluate.py \
    --evaluator_name qwen3vl8b-pairwise \
    --task_type image \
    --pairs_path /path/to/t2i.json \
    --output_path ./outputs/task1_qwen3vl8b-pairwise.json \
    --n_gpu 8

Task Types

Task Type Flag Benchmark File
Text-to-Image image t2i.json
Image Editing edit edit.json
Interleaved interleaved interleaved.json
Visual Reasoning reasoning reasoning.json

Adding Your Own LLM as judge

You can add your own model as a judge by following these steps:

For API-based Models

  1. Add your API client in evaluator_apis/model_apis/your_provider/:
# evaluator_apis/model_apis/your_provider/your_model.py
class YourModelClient:
    def __init__(self, api_key: str):
        self.api_key = api_key
    
    def generate(self, messages: list) -> str:
        # Call your API and return the response text
        ...
  1. Create your evaluator class in evaluator_apis/llm_judges/api_pairwise_evaluator.py:
class YourModelPairwiseEvaluator(APIPairwiseEvaluator):
    def __init__(self, device_id: int = None):
        # Initialize your model client
        self.client = YourModelClient(api_key="...")
    
    @property
    def evaluator_name(self):
        return "your-model_pairwise_evaluator"
    
    def generate_response(self, prompt: List[List[str]]) -> str:
        # Convert prompt to your API format and get response
        ...
  1. Register your evaluator in evaluator_apis/evaluators.py:
from .llm_judges import YourModelPairwiseEvaluator

EVALUATORS = {
    # ... existing evaluators ...
    "your-model-pairwise": {
        "class": YourModelPairwiseEvaluator,
        "type": EvaluatorTypes.PAIRWISE,
        "is_api_based": True,
        "capabilities": [
            EvaluatorCapabilities.IMAGE,
            EvaluatorCapabilities.EDIT,
            EvaluatorCapabilities.INTERLEAVED,
            EvaluatorCapabilities.REASONING,
        ],
    },
}

For Local Models

  1. Add your model in evaluator_apis/llm_judges/local_models.py:
class LocalModelManager:
    MODEL_CONFIGS = {
        # ... existing models ...
        "your-local-model": {
            "huggingface_id": "your-org/your-model",
        },
    }
  1. Create your evaluator class in evaluator_apis/llm_judges/local_pairwise_evaluator.py:
class YourLocalModelPairwiseEvaluator(LocalPairwiseEvaluator):
    def __init__(self, device_id: int = None):
        super().__init__(model_name="your-local-model", device_id=device_id)
  1. Register in evaluators.py with "is_api_based": False.

Output Format

see the sample output files under generate_judgements/outputs/

Part 2: Compute Scores

Compute accuracy by comparing judgements against ground truth labels.

Usage

cd compute_scores

# Evaluate a single task. Can be image/edit/interleaved/reasoning
python compute_accuracy.py --task image \
    --predictions ../generate_judgements/outputs/sample_task1_image.json

# Evaluate all 4 tasks
python compute_accuracy.py --task all \
    --predictions ../generate_judgements/outputs/sample_task1_image.json \
                  ../generate_judgements/outputs/sample_task2_edit.json \
                  ../generate_judgements/outputs/sample_task3_interleaved.json \
                  ../generate_judgements/outputs/sample_task4_reasoning.json

Scoring Logic

For each pair:

  1. Forward: Compare forward.judgement with ground truth chosen
  2. Reverse: Flip reverse.judgement (A↔B), then compare with chosen
  3. Overall accuracy = (forward_correct + reverse_correct) / total

Output Format

==================================================
SUMMARY
==================================================
Task                      Accuracy     Missing
--------------------------------------------------
task1_image                53.20%      0
task2_edit                 55.50%      0
task3_interleaved          57.50%      0
task4_reasoning            47.50%      0
--------------------------------------------------
Overall                    53.42%
==================================================