You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: README.md
+22-5Lines changed: 22 additions & 5 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -31,20 +31,37 @@ S7RTT is not intended to replace Ruckig for multi-DOF cases, but it offers disti
31
31

32
32
* However, more often than not, even within the constraints, Ruckig still attempts to insert a Brake motion, which leads to a suboptimal final solution.
33
33

34
-
* More seriously, Ruckig frequently reports solution failures, which is unacceptable in practical applications. Below are the results of stress tests under random conditions.
34
+
* Specifically, Ruckig recommends using "m" as the unit. If you use "mm" with a large jerk, planning failures will occur frequently, while S7RTT recommends using "mm" as the unit. Below is a comparison of scaled random stress tests in normal operation:
0 commit comments