chore(manual): format

jdujava · jdujava · commit 061446e44d50 · 2025-05-25T15:45:50.000+02:00
Signed-off-by: Jonas Dujava &lt;jonas.dujava@gmail.com&gt;
diff --git a/chapters/Appendix.tex b/chapters/Appendix.tex
@@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ \section{Appendix Section}%
 \end{remark}
 
 \begin{example}[Equation Numbering and Referencing]
-    As was mentioned already in \Cref{sec:Document Structure}, equations share numbering with \emph{structure environments}. For example, the equation
+    As was mentioned already in \Cref{sec:Document Structure}, equations share numbering with \emph{structure environments}.
+    For example, the equation
     \begin{equation} \label{eq:appendix_equation}
         \phi^{*}\bm{g}' \overset{!}{=} \Omega^{2}\bm{g} \equiv \E*^{2\omega}\bm{g}
     \end{equation}
diff --git a/chapters/Design.tex b/chapters/Design.tex
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ \chapter{Design Principles} \label{ch:Design}
     \mspace{12mu} \text{and} \mspace{10mu}
     \parbox[c]{7em}{\centering implemented certain features}
     \quad\longleadsto{}\quad
-    \parbox[c]{10em}{\centering recognized\\\textcolor{gray}{at first subconscious} overarching principles}~.
+    \parbox[c]{10em}{\centering recognized \\\textcolor{gray}{at first subconscious} overarching principles}~.
 \]
 Anyway, here they are.
 \begin{definition}[Design Principles] \label{def:Design Principles}
@@ -20,7 +20,8 @@ \chapter{Design Principles} \label{ch:Design}
     \end{itemize}
 \end{definition}
 \begin{remark}[Common Goal, Alternative Definition via Antiprinciples]
-    There is also an alternative point of view. The common goal of \Nref*{def:Design Principles} is to minimize the following \emph{Antiprinciples}:
+    There is also an alternative point of view.
+    The common goal of \Nref*{def:Design Principles} is to minimize the following \emph{Antiprinciples}:
     \begin{itemize}
         \item We should be concise, and that means fewer pages, the better.
               Long blocks of text without noticeable space between paragraphs are preferred (the reader should go on a walk to have some breathing spacetime).
@@ -32,8 +33,7 @@ \chapter{Design Principles} \label{ch:Design}
 Each of these principles is somehow reflected in the design choices and features included (or omitted) in \TeXtured{}, see \Cref{ch:Features} for more details.
 
 \begin{remark}[Disclaimer]
-    The following is at places highly opinionated, and not applicable to all
-    scenarios and use-cases.
+    The following is at places highly opinionated, and not applicable to all scenarios and use-cases.
     I tried to describe my reasons for specific design choices, with which you can certainly disagree.
     I hope that at least it can provoke more people \emph{(especially you!)} to contemplate about document creation, ideally resulting in production of documents with overall better quality.
 \end{remark}
diff --git a/chapters/Features.tex b/chapters/Features.tex
@@ -234,8 +234,7 @@ \subsection{\texorpdfstring{Micro-\!Typography}{Micro-Typography}}%
 
 Following quote from \package{microtype} documentation nicely explains what it is about:
 \begin{displayquote}
-    Micro-typography is the art of enhancing the appearance and readability of a
-    document while exhibiting a minimum degree of visual obtrusion.
+    Micro-typography is the art of enhancing the appearance and readability of a document while exhibiting a minimum degree of visual obtrusion.
     It is concerned with what happens between or at the margins of characters, words or lines.
     Whereas the macro-typographical aspects of a document (i.e., its layout) are clearly visible even to the untrained eye, micro-typographical refinements should ideally not even be recognizable.
     That is, you may think that a document looks beautiful, but you might not be able to tell exactly why: good micro-typographic practice tries to reduce all potential irritations that might disturb a reader.
@@ -260,8 +259,7 @@ \subsection{Structure Environments}%
 Implemented mostly \package{tcolorbox} package and \package{keytheorems} (modern key--value interface for \package{amsthm}).
 
 \begin{remark}[Default Environments]
-    There are predefined boxed \enquote{theorem-like} environments for \textsf{Definition}, \textsf{Theorem}, \textsf{Lemma}, \textsf{Corollary}, \textsf{Proposition},
-    and non-boxed \enquote{remark-like} environments for \textsf{Remark}, \textsf{Proof}, \textsf{Example}, \textsf{Derivation}, \textsf{Calculation}, \textsf{Idea}, and \textsf{Tip} (these have at least a mark indicating the end of the environment).
+    There are predefined boxed \enquote{theorem-like} environments for \textsf{Definition}, \textsf{Theorem}, \textsf{Lemma}, \textsf{Corollary}, \textsf{Proposition}, and non-boxed \enquote{remark-like} environments for \textsf{Remark}, \textsf{Proof}, \textsf{Example}, \textsf{Derivation}, \textsf{Calculation}, \textsf{Idea}, and \textsf{Tip} (these have at least a mark indicating the end of the environment).
 
     Names of the corresponding environments are lowercase, for example \texttt{definition}, \texttt{remark}, and so on.
     They also accept an optional argument for a short description.
@@ -437,7 +435,8 @@ \subsection{Math-Related Tweaks --- \texorpdfstring{\rmfamily\(\E^{\I\pi}\)}{exp
 \vspace{1ex}
 Following practice is highly recommended.
 \begin{tip}[Define Your Own Math Macros]
-    Frequently define macros for notation used more than once. Advantages are for example:
+    Frequently define macros for notation used more than once.
+    Advantages are for example:
     \begin{itemize}
         \item Code is easier to read/write, since it is more \enquote{semantic}.
         \item To tweak notation, you only need to change it in one place.
