Setup
- Which version of
microsoft/git are you using? Is it 32-bit or 64-bit?
$ git --version --build-options
git version 2.45.0.vfs.0.0
cpu: x86_64
built from commit: b68812e6facef46153bdeb3d79c1b8f353b8e94d
sizeof-long: 4
sizeof-size_t: 8
shell-path: /bin/sh
feature: fsmonitor--daemon
Are you using Scalar or VFS for Git?
VFS for Git.
$ gvfs version
GVFS 1.0.24074.1
- Which version of Windows are you running? Vista, 7, 8, 10? Is it 32-bit or 64-bit?
$ cmd.exe /c ver
Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.26203.5000]
- Any other interesting things about your environment that might be related
to the issue you're seeing?
The repo is the Windows monorepo
Details
- Which terminal/shell are you running Git from? e.g Bash/CMD/PowerShell/other
PowerShell via Terminal Windows app
# on a fresh clone of the Windows monorepo
git reset --mixed head~1
- What did you expect to occur after running these commands?
I expected the files modified by the most recent commit to be moved to the "unstaged" status.
- What actually happened instead?
Running git status reported that the working tree was clean. Note that if I had instead run git reset --soft head~1, the files would have correctly been put into the staged state. Subsequently running git reset --mixed head would trigger the repro, though.
This seems very similar to #490. @derrickstolee FYI.
or closed issue matching
what I'm seeing, including in the
git-for-windows/gittracker.Setup
microsoft/gitare you using? Is it 32-bit or 64-bit?Are you using Scalar or VFS for Git?
VFS for Git.
to the issue you're seeing?
The repo is the Windows monorepo
Details
PowerShell via Terminal Windows app
Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example
this will help us understand the issue.
I expected the files modified by the most recent commit to be moved to the "unstaged" status.
Running
git statusreported that the working tree was clean. Note that if I had instead rungit reset --soft head~1, the files would have correctly been put into the staged state. Subsequently runninggit reset --mixed headwould trigger the repro, though.This seems very similar to #490. @derrickstolee FYI.
If the problem was occurring with a specific repository, can you specify
the repository?