Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
137 lines (88 loc) · 9.16 KB

File metadata and controls

137 lines (88 loc) · 9.16 KB

title: "NetSI Journal Club" author:

  • name: Network Science Institute ...

Fall 2020

Organizer: Stefan McCabe

Time: Every other Friday, 2:00--3:00

Candidate Papers: Link

October 23: A detour into the social sciences

October 9: Hierarchical community structure

  • Schaub, Michael T., and Leto Peel. 2020. “Hierarchical Community Structure in Networks.” arXiv:2009.07196 [cs.SI]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.07196.
  • Peel, Leto, and Michael T. Schaub. 2020. “Detectability of Hierarchical Communities in Networks.” arXiv:2009.07525 [cs.SI]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.07525.

September 25: The scale-free networks debate, re-reconsidered

  • Jacomy, Mathieu. 2020. “Epistemic Clashes in Network Science: Mapping the Tensions between Idiographic and Nomothetic Subcultures.” Big Data & Society 7 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720949577.

Fall 2019

Organizer: Stefan McCabe

Time: Every other Thursday, 2:00--3:00

November 14: Network topology

October 31: Transsortativity in networks

  • Wu, Xin-Zeng, Allon G. Percus, Keith Burghardt, and Kristina Lerman. 2019. “The Transsortative Structure of Networks.” arXiv:1910.09538 [physics.soc-ph]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09538.
  • Altenburger, Kristen M., and Johan Ugander. 2018. “Monophily in Social Networks Introduces Similarity Among Friends-of-Friends.” Nature Human Behaviour 2 (4): 284–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0321-8. (optional)

October 17: Machine learning and network science

  • Rodrigues, Francisco A., Thomas Peron, Colm Connaughton, Jurgen Kurths, and Yamir Moreno. 2019. “A Machine Learning Approach to Predicting Dynamical Observables from Network Structure.” arXiv:1910.00544 [physics.soc-ph]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.00544.

October 3: Non-normal networks

  • Asllani, Malbor, Renaud Lambiotte, and Timoteo Carletti. 2018. “Structure and Dynamical Behavior of Non-Normal Networks.” Science Advances 4 (12): eaau9403. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau9403.

September 19: Message passing

Summer 2019

Organizer: Stefan McCabe

Time: Every other Friday, 3:00--4:00

May 17: Statistics of complex systems

May 3: Temporal validity

  • Munger, Kevin. 2019. “Knowledge Decays: Temporal Validity in Online Social Science.” Working Paper. https://osf.io/bka9z/.

Spring 2019

Organizer: Stefan McCabe

Time: Every other Friday, 3:00--4:00.

April 19: Information spreading

  • Canright, Geoffrey S., and Kenth Engø-Monsen. 2005. “Epidemic Spreading Over Networks – A View from Neighbourhoods.” Telektronikk 101 (1): 65–85.
  • Martin, Travis, Xiao Zhang, and M. E. J. Newman. 2014. “Localization and Centrality in Networks.” Physical Review E 90 (5): 052808. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.052808.
  • Kitsak, Maksim, Lazaros K. Gallos, Shlomo Havlin, Fredrik Liljeros, Lev Muchnik, H. Eugene Stanley, and Hernán A. Makse. 2010. “Identification of Influential Spreaders in Complex Networks.” Nature Physics 6 (11): 888–93. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1746.

April 5: The path not taken in community detection?

  • Canright, Geoffrey S., and Kenth Engø-Monsen. 2005. “Epidemic Spreading Over Networks – A View from Neighbourhoods.” Telektronikk 101 (1): 65–85.
  • Fortunato, Santo. 2010. “Community Detection in Graphs.” Physics Reports 486 (3–5): 75–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002.

March 15: Threshold models of network contagion

  • Eckles, Dean, Elchanan Mossel, M. Amin Rahimian, and Subhabrata Sen. 2018. “Long Ties Accelerate Noisy Threshold-Based Contagions.” arXiv:1810.03579v2 [cs.SI]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1810.03579v2.
  • Juul, Jonas S., and Mason A. Porter. 2019. “Hipsters on Networks: How a Minority Group of Individuals Can Lead to an Antiestablishment Majority.” Physical Review E 99 (2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.99.022313.

March 1: Growing networks

(with Austin Benson)

Note: this session will meet 3:30--4:30 to accommodate Thomas Malone's talk at NetSI.

  • Overgoor, Jan, Austin R. Benson, and Johan Ugander. 2018. “Choosing to Grow a Graph: Modeling Network Formation as Discrete Choice.” arXiv:1811.05008 [cs.SI]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.05008.

February 15: Information-theoretic network comparison

Fall 2018

Organizer: Ryan J. Gallagher

November 16: The scale-free networks debate, reconsidered

(with NETS 8941)

  • Voitalov, Ivan, Pim van der Hoorn, Remco van der Hofstad, and Dmitri Krioukov. 2018. “Scale-Free Networks Well Done.” arXiv:1811.02071 [physics.soc-ph]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.02071.

October 25: The moving target of computational social science

  • Chaney, Allison J. B., Brandon M. Stewart, and Barbara E. Engelhardt. 2018. “How Algorithmic Confounding in Recommendation Systems Increases Homogeneity and Decreases Utility.” In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, 224–32. New York: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240323.3240370.
  • Healy, Kieran. 2015. “The Performativity of Networks.” European Journal of Sociology 56 (2): 175–205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975615000107.

October 24: Do we need to infer network structure?

(Part 2, with Emergent Epidemics Lab)

October 17: Do we need to infer network structure?

(Part 1, with Emergent Epidemics Lab)

  • Hoffmann, Till, Leto Peel, Renaud Lambiotte, and Nick S. Jones. 2018. “Community Detection in Networks with Unobserved Edges.” arXiv:1808.06079 [physics.soc-ph]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.06079.

October 11: Noisy networks

  • Newman, Mark E. J. 2018. “Network Structure from Rich but Noisy Data.” Nature Physics 14 (6): 542–45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0076-1.
  • Young, Jean-Gabriel, Laurent Hébert-Dufresne, Edward Laurence, Charles Murphy, Guillaume St-Onge, and Patrick Desrosiers. 2018. “Network Archaeology: Phase Transition in the Recoverability of Network History.” arXiv:1803.09191 [physics.soc-ph]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.09191.

Summer 2018

Organizer: Ryan J. Gallagher

May 25: Multiscale structure of complex networks

  • Bagrow, James P., and Erik M. Bollt. 2018. “An Information-Theoretic, All-Scales Approach to Comparing Networks.” arXiv:1804.03665 [cs.SI]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.03665.
  • Hébert-Dufresne, Laurent, Joshua A. Grochow, and Antoine Allard. 2016. “Multi-Scale Structure and Topological Anomaly Detection via a New Network Statistic: The Onion Decomposition.” Scientific Reports 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31708.

May 4: Homophily and assortativity

  • Altenburger, Kristen M., and Johan Ugander. 2018. “Monophily in Social Networks Introduces Similarity Among Friends-of-Friends.” Nature Human Behaviour 2 (4): 284–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0321-8.
  • Peel, Leto, Jean-Charles Delvenne, and Renaud Lambiotte. 2018. “Multiscale Mixing Patterns in Networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (16): 4057–62. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713019115.

Spring 2018

Organizer: Ryan J. Gallagher

April 24: Twitter cascades

  • Goel, Sharad, Ashton Anderson, Jake Hofman, and Duncan J. Watts. 2015. “The Structural Virality of Online Diffusion.” Management Science 62 (1), 180–96. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2158.

January 26: The scale-free networks debate