The following is a set of guidelines for contributing to OSSN's projects and docs.
This project and everyone participating in it is governed by a Code of Conduct based on the Contributor Code of Conduct. By participating, you are expected to uphold this code.
This section guides you through submitting a bug report for OSSN. Following these guidelines helps maintainers and the community understand your report 📝, reproduce the behavior 💻, and find related reports 🔎.
Before creating bug reports, please check this list as you might find out that you don't need to create one. When you are creating a bug report, please include as many details as possible.
Note: If you find a Closed issue that seems like it is the same thing that you're experiencing, open a new issue and include a link to the original issue in the body of your new one.
- Determine which repository the problem should be reported in.
- Perform a cursory search to see if the problem has already been reported. If it has and the issue is still open, add a comment to the existing issue instead of opening a new one.
Bugs are tracked as GitHub issues. After you've determined which repository your bug is related to, create an issue on that repository and provide the following information:
Explain the problem and include additional details to help maintainers reproduce the problem:
- Use a clear and descriptive title for the issue to identify the problem.
- Describe the exact steps which reproduce the problem in as many details as possible. When listing steps, don't just say what you did, but explain how you did it.
- Provide specific examples to demonstrate the steps. Include links to files or GitHub projects, or copy/pasteable snippets, which you use in those examples. If you're providing snippets in the issue, use Markdown code blocks.
- Describe the behavior you observed after following the steps and point out what exactly is the problem with that behavior.
- Explain which behavior you expected to see instead and why.
- Include screenshots or videos which show you following the described steps and clearly demonstrate the problem.
- If the problem wasn't triggered by a specific action, describe what you were doing before the problem happened and share more information using the guidelines below.
Provide more context by answering these questions:
- Did the problem start happening recently (e.g. after updating to a new version of Conductor) or was this always a problem?
- If the problem started happening recently.**
- Can you reliably reproduce the issue? If not, provide details about how often the problem happens and under which conditions it normally happens.
Include details about your configuration and environment:
- Which version of the package are you using?
- What's the name and version of the OS you're using?
This section guides you through submitting an enhancement suggestion for OSSN's projects, including completely new features and minor improvements to existing functionality. Following these guidelines helps maintainers and the community understand your suggestion 📝 and find related suggestions 🔎.
Enhancement suggestions are tracked as GitHub issues. After you've determined which repository your enhancement suggestion is related to, create an issue on that repository and provide the following information:
- Use a clear and descriptive title for the issue to identify the suggestion.
- Provide a step-by-step description of the suggested enhancement in as many details as possible.
- Provide specific examples to demonstrate the steps. Include copy/pasteable snippets which you use in those examples, as Markdown code blocks.
- Describe the current behavior and explain which behavior you expected to see instead and why.
- Include screenshots
- Explain why this enhancement would be useful
- Specify the name and version of the OS you're using.
The process described here has several goals:
- Maintain quality
- Fix problems that are important to users
- Engage the community in working toward the best possible experience
- Enable a sustainable system for OSSN's maintainers to review contributions
Please follow these steps to have your contribution considered by the maintainers:
- After you submit your pull request, verify that all status checks are passing
What if the status checks are failing?
If a status check is failing, and you believe that the failure is unrelated to your change, please leave a comment on the pull request explaining why you believe the failure is unrelated. A maintainer will re-run the status check for you. If we conclude that the failure was a false positive, then we will open an issue to track that problem with our status check suite.
While the prerequisites above must be satisfied prior to having your pull request reviewed, the reviewer(s) may ask you to complete additional design work, tests, or other changes before your pull request can be ultimately accepted.
- Use the present tense ("Add feature" not "Added feature")
- Limit the first line to 72 characters or less
- Reference issues and pull requests after the first line
- Consider starting the commit message with an applicable emoji:
- 🎨
:art:when improving the format/structure of the code - 🐎
:racehorse:when improving performance - 🚱
:non-potable_water:when plugging memory leaks - 📝
:memo:when writing docs - 🐧
:penguin:when fixing something on Linux - 🍎
:apple:when fixing something on macOS - 🏁
:checkered_flag:when fixing something on Windows - 🐛
:bug:when fixing a bug - 🔥
:fire:when removing code or files - 💚
:green_heart:when fixing the CI build - ✅
:white_check_mark:when adding tests - 🔒
:lock:when dealing with security - ⬆️
:arrow_up:when upgrading dependencies - ⬇️
:arrow_down:when downgrading dependencies - 👕
:shirt:when removing linter warnings
- 🎨
- Use Markdown.