I'm wondering why you chose to adopt this workflow. Do you really want to get rid of the individual commits, or do you only like the simplified history? We're looking at using this tool because it closely matches our current workflow, with the biggest difference being the squashing.

It's probably a lack of understanding on my part, but I'm wondering what advantage I'm missing, since the cleaner history can also be gotten with git log --first-parent and seeing everything that was merged in a specific commit can be achieved with git show -m SHA1 (provided you do --no-ff merge commits).

This might also be something to add to the README or Wiki, since I can't be the only one wondering this.