While performing a license analysis on the source code I found a conflicting EULA in res/raw/eula. It has problematic areas, like the software is only available for non-commercial use, and some of the terms are probably considered a "further restriction" under the GPL. My hope is that this file was just overlooked and wasn't supposed to have been included in the distribution.
While performing a license analysis on the source code I found a conflicting EULA in res/raw/eula. It has problematic areas, like the software is only available for non-commercial use, and some of the terms are probably considered a "further restriction" under the GPL. My hope is that this file was just overlooked and wasn't supposed to have been included in the distribution.