Hey guys,
your library is working very fine so far (extra properties check is also works good now) and i'm heavily working, to bring the next proper restfuncs release, which will hopefully bring in some more users ;)
What could still be improved, is a check, to see if RTTI is really available for a type / method. At the moment, reflect(something) returns a valid ReflectedXXX all the time and the members are just empty. I have to do some very hacky workarounds, to see, if the info is accurate (does the method really have 0 args, or is there just no RTTI enhanced). Also i have to check for methods that were actually declared at parent class level, where the parent class file is from a non another code base. Would be nice, to make this more convenient.
Hey guys,
your library is working very fine so far (extra properties check is also works good now) and i'm heavily working, to bring the next proper restfuncs release, which will hopefully bring in some more users ;)
What could still be improved, is a check, to see if RTTI is really available for a type / method. At the moment,
reflect(something)returns a valid ReflectedXXX all the time and the members are just empty. I have to do some very hacky workarounds, to see, if the info is accurate (does the method really have 0 args, or is there just no RTTI enhanced). Also i have to check for methods that were actually declared at parent class level, where the parent class file is from a non another code base. Would be nice, to make this more convenient.