Modlog

CONTENT WARNING: Some deleted posts may contain disturbing or adult material. Proceed with caution.

/c/buttcoin Modlog

Filter by user

Time	mod	Action
1 month ago	mod	Banned phonics@lemmy.world from the community Buttcoin@awful.systems reason: coiner
2 months ago	mod	Banned x00z@lemmy.world from the community Buttcoin@awful.systems reason: coiner
2 months ago	mod	Banned LumpyPancakes@piefed.social from the community Buttcoin@awful.systems reason: coiner
2 months ago	mod	Removed Comment It's a brilliant invention that took a lot of work by some incredible intelligent people and it's incredibly amazing it has passed the test of these 14 years. Internet money? You can bet everyone will try to hack that. As far of the usage and use case itself, that's another matter. by NoiseColor @lemmy.world reason: holy shit
2 months ago	mod	Removed Comment It absolutely does in this case. by NoiseColor @lemmy.world reason: coiner nonsense
2 months ago	mod	Removed Comment You don't have any logic behind you, so you can't counterpoint like that by NoiseColor @lemmy.world reason: coiner nonsense, also jacking off motions
2 months ago	mod	Removed Comment It sounds like you have gpt3 logic. by NoiseColor @lemmy.world reason: coiner nonsense
2 months ago	mod	Banned NoiseColor @lemmy.world from the community Buttcoin@awful.systems reason: coiner
5 months ago	mod	Banned Saledovil@sh.itjust.works from the community Buttcoin@awful.systems reason: mid
8 months ago	mod	Removed Post kjjj reason: spam
1 year ago	mod	Banned Sibshops@lemm.ee from the community Buttcoin@awful.systems reason: failing to provide amusing debate expires: 1 year ago
1 year ago	mod	Unbanned Sibshops@lemm.ee from the community Buttcoin@awful.systems reason: misclicked while picking duration
1 year ago	mod	Banned Sibshops@lemm.ee from the community Buttcoin@awful.systems reason: failing to provide amusing debate
1 year ago	mod	Removed Comment I kinda like her body. Can anyone keak her OF videos? by yoz@aussie.zone reason: no
1 year ago	mod	Removed Comment Come on, it's the internet, we sorta respect the honest degenerates here (at least he's not dishonest) by sir_pronoun@lemmy.world reason: no
2 years ago	mod	Removed Comment [@Soyweiser](https://awful.systems/u/Soyweiser) [@gerikson](https://awful.systems/u/gerikson) email me, f\\\* your message at the beep! by Huckster Noise@mastodon.social reason: deny
2 years ago	mod	Removed Comment [@Soyweiser](https://awful.systems/u/Soyweiser) [@gerikson](https://awful.systems/u/gerikson) the "crocodile" of wall street! silver on her fingers and boots on her feet by Huckster Noise@mastodon.social reason: deny
2 years ago	mod	Removed Comment Why? Is there a case of the unicode comission blocking proposals of a scientology emoji? by laughterlaughter@lemmy.world reason: nope still fucking terrible
2 years ago	mod	Removed Comment Good for you. I never said I'm "non-political." That's a red herring, but just to be clear: did you miss the part where I said that emojis should represent what people think or talk about? All those examples you put are _exactly_ what I meant. And did you miss the part in which I mentioned Christianity? Because if you think that Christianity is a non-political thing today, then I got news for you. BACK to the fucking discussion: You're proving my point that the emoji bitcoin should then be included. Because a large group of people talk about it, in pro- or against. by laughterlaughter@lemmy.world reason: no thx
2 years ago	mod	Removed Comment Edit: Way to miss the point, downvoters. My point about emojis being "non-political" doesn't mean to say "no politics." I means "include whatever the fuck people talk about these days, be it in favor or against." Just like the dictionary. Should dictionaries exclude [the word "bitcoin,"](https://www.oed.com/dictionary/bitcoin_n) then? Or am I being downvoted by Christians? I don't think emojis should be the place to have a socio-political discussion. Emojis should reflect how people popularly communicate. Having said that, in regards of impressionable folks: If Christianity gets to have a cross emoji (which is a torture device, let's remember), then so should Bitcoin. And I don't even like either! by laughterlaughter@lemmy.world reason: fucking terrible post that turned into a downvote whine
2 years ago	mod	Removed Comment I don't know if I'm reading this right because it seems so retarded? Make emojis open, why are they locked down to begin with? They're KB-sized silly icons. by Potatisen@lemmy.world reason: no
2 years ago	mod	Banned Shawdow194@kbin.run from the community Buttcoin@awful.systems reason: wrong place buddy
2 years ago	mod	Removed Comment I haven't looked closely at these specific cards so I have nothing to say on their subjective artistic merit, but I agree with the principles here: 1. Art has value and artists deserve to be paid. 2. AI is a tool artists can use to make art. (It does not make art on its own.) 3. Creating high quality AI art is not a simple or unskilled task. Not just anybody can use AI and magically get good results. For those not familiar with the processes used with AI image generators, take a look at [ComfyUI](https://github.com/comfyanonymous/ComfyUI). The processing graphs (or "hypernetworks") of ComfyUI can be arbitrarily complex, and if you have specific design goals, it takes a lot of know-how to use effectively. You can look at examples at https://comfyworkflows.com, and you can see the hypernetworks used for each example image. Some of these have dozens of connected networks, each with specific configurations. It's really neat! Again, I have no opinion on (or interest in criticizing) these particular examples of AI-generated/AI-assisted art. I'm just talking about the technique. You can make shitty art in any medium, and seriously, most art in any given medium is shitty, so don't judge the medium by a few examples. Try to look at the potential hidden behind those examples. Picture an image in your head, and think about what it would actually take to make that (not just something vaguely resembling it) using AI. I guarantee you, it's not as simple as "type in a prompt"! This is especially true in the context of larger artistic works that require coherency between images (like, say, a consistent character design). It's possible to do that today, but it requires a lot of skill and practice. It will likely get a lot easier in the future, and more importantly, artists will hone their skills over time, the way they do with every medium. And if you want to get really specific, you probably need to train or finetune some networks for yourself. That's a whole other layer of complexity and power. by GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org reason: AI spam