• 0 Posts
  • 225 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 4th, 2025

help-circle









  • “Almost but not quite” is exactly my experience with Claude.

    The only time I’ve had real success is telling it to do a simple API change that touches a dozen files. It took a while and I’m not sure it was faster than doing it manually, but at least it was less boring.

    Possibly important context: I only started really using it a few weeks ago.





  • There’s a couple of pigeons that made a nest in my backyard two years ago. It’s located right next to a wall that’s frequented by cats. It’s also right next to the back door, so every time we go out the birds leave the nest in a panic, leaving the chicks behind. That is, if there would be any chicks - the nest has such big holes that the eggs just fall out onto the ground.



  • This distinction — between “design” and “content” — sounds reasonable for about three seconds. Then you realize it falls apart completely.

    Bull fucking shit. This is not about platforms being held responsible for user content. This is about adding points and badges and achievements and all kinds of things designed to reward engagement with dopamine.

    The author’s example of all content being drying paint would absolutely be addictive if the platform added an achievement for watching 10 different colours. Or: Congratulations, you’ve watched paint dry for 100 hours! As a reward, you get a new fancy emote! THAT is what these platforms do, and that is what is addictive. And that is what they’ve been convicted for.

    Is not a loophole to get around section 230 as the author claims.