Comments for Annoying Precision https://qchu.wordpress.com "A good stock of examples, as large as possible, is indispensable for a thorough understanding of any concept, and when I want to learn something new, I make it my first job to build one." - Paul Halmos Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:04:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ Comment on Groupoid cardinality by Mohamed Salaheldeen https://qchu.wordpress.com/2012/11/08/groupoid-cardinality/#comment-116126 Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:04:03 +0000 http://qchu.wordpress.com/?p=11651#comment-116126 Sorry I don’t understand how is EG equivalent to a point groupoid? I only see the collapse functor which as far as I understand is not an equivalence.

]]>
Comment on Coalgebras of distributions by Qiaochu Yuan https://qchu.wordpress.com/2016/03/19/coalgebras-of-distributions/#comment-116124 Sat, 22 Mar 2025 12:16:03 +0000 http://qchu.wordpress.com/?p=23444#comment-116124 In reply to matthewcushman.

Ah, I guess that’s a little confusing. It means the extension of scalars of D to a coalgebra over K[\varepsilon]/\varepsilon^2, so the comultiplication is just being extended K[\varepsilon]/\varepsilon^2-linearly.

]]>
Comment on What’s a fire, and why does it – what’s the word – burn? by Shawn Hu https://qchu.wordpress.com/2016/05/26/whats-a-fire-and-why-does-it-whats-the-word-burn/#comment-116123 Tue, 11 Mar 2025 08:37:32 +0000 http://qchu.wordpress.com/?p=25649#comment-116123 The title of this post reminded me of this [famous interview with Feynman](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1pIYI5JQLE). In the first 2 minutes or so he gets around to describing, in great detail, what you said in the first three sentences of this post.

]]>
Comment on Coalgebras of distributions by matthewcushman https://qchu.wordpress.com/2016/03/19/coalgebras-of-distributions/#comment-116122 Sun, 02 Mar 2025 03:44:50 +0000 http://qchu.wordpress.com/?p=23444#comment-116122 Amazing, thanks! I’m a little confused by the last theorem though. What is meant by D[e]/e^2? (No epsilon key) If D is only a coalgebra I’m not sure how to interpret eg e^2.

]]>
Comment on Extracting the diagonal by columbus8myhw https://qchu.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/extracting-the-diagonal/#comment-116106 Thu, 16 May 2024 21:28:16 +0000 http://qchu.wordpress.com/?p=2245#comment-116106 I don’t know how to format LaTeX on WordPress, but hopefully this image works.

]]>
Comment on Extracting the diagonal by columbus8myhw https://qchu.wordpress.com/2009/10/07/extracting-the-diagonal/#comment-116105 Thu, 16 May 2024 21:20:30 +0000 http://qchu.wordpress.com/?p=2245#comment-116105 Very interesting! I used your strategy to show that if $a_n$ is determined by the $n$th coefficient of $(ax^2+bx+c)^n$, then the generating series of $a_n$ is
$$frac1{sqrt{(b^2-4ac)x^2-2b+1}}.$$
I don’t know if this result is already known. (I assume it is.)

Incidentally, in all your examples, as $rto0$, all the poles tend to either $0$ or $infty$. Is that true in general? If so, when you say to sum over poles in the unit circle, you could have instead said to sum over poles that don’t blow up.

In short, that means the technique is that $D_F(r^2)$ is the sum of the residues of $frac1zF(rz,rz^{-1})$ over all poles that don’t blow up as $rto0$.

]]>
Comment on Regular and effective monomorphisms and epimorphisms by E. https://qchu.wordpress.com/2012/11/03/regular-and-effective-monomorphisms-and-epimorphisms/#comment-116104 Fri, 19 Apr 2024 19:44:55 +0000 http://qchu.wordpress.com/?p=11021#comment-116104 Very interesting. As analyst, I am mostly familiar with Banach spaces. Can we have an explicit description of regular monomorphism and regular epimorphism. Are regular epimorphism surjective ?

]]>
Comment on Ideals and the category of commutative rings by Pete https://qchu.wordpress.com/2010/01/12/ideals-and-the-category-of-commutative-rings/#comment-116103 Mon, 26 Feb 2024 21:16:45 +0000 http://qchu.wordpress.com/?p=4565#comment-116103 You probably mean: “And in 

text{CRing}

the coslice category 

F downarrow C

 for 

F

 a field is precisely the category of commutative

F

-algebras.”

]]>
Comment on Fixed points of random permutations by Anonymous https://qchu.wordpress.com/2012/11/07/fixed-points-of-random-permutations/#comment-116102 Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:49:49 +0000 http://qchu.wordpress.com/?p=11610#comment-116102 Would you have published references to your “reasonably well-known exercises in combinatorics” and to your E(X^k)=B_k?

]]>
Comment on Introduction to string diagrams by Felix Pahl https://qchu.wordpress.com/2012/11/05/introduction-to-string-diagrams/#comment-116101 Mon, 08 Jan 2024 12:40:18 +0000 http://qchu.wordpress.com/?p=11322#comment-116101 Thanks for the nice post 🙂

I think in the equation after “is equal to” the last composition should be a tensor product?

]]>