Skip to content

Declare targets supporting explicit resource management (using)#4374

Closed
Andarist wants to merge 1 commit intoevanw:mainfrom
Andarist:using-support-target-table
Closed

Declare targets supporting explicit resource management (using)#4374
Andarist wants to merge 1 commit intoevanw:mainfrom
Andarist:using-support-target-table

Conversation

@Andarist
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Andarist Andarist commented Jan 7, 2026

No description provided.

Safari: {{start: v{9, 0, 0}}},
},
Using: {},
Using: {
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@@ -1 +1 @@
// This file was automatically generated by "js_table.ts"
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're editing an automatically-generated file :)

Don't worry about figuring out the right way to do this. It's easy for me to do, so I can take it from here. This data is typically automatically derived from various sources. However, it looks like esbuild's sources are indicating that the correct support matrix looks more like this:

  • Chrome: 143+
  • Edge: 143+
  • Firefox: 147+
  • Node: 25+

There are several implementation bugs known in earlier versions of these platforms, so esbuild should still apply the transform to avoid them. This is one example that doesn't work correctly in Node 24. The data esbuild pulls from can be visualized here (sort of): https://compat-table.github.io/compat-table/esnext/

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're editing an automatically-generated file :)

Oops 😅 i have not noticed that

@evanw evanw closed this in e8d861b Feb 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants