Algopoly https://algopoly.com/ Energy Generation, Load and Distribution Forecast by Machine Learning, Data Analytics Thu, 19 Feb 2026 09:48:40 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 https://algopoly.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/cropped-algo_logo_favicon-32x32.png Algopoly https://algopoly.com/ 32 32 WPP Cost Report – January 2026 https://algopoly.com/wpp-cost-report-january-2026/ Thu, 19 Feb 2026 09:48:40 +0000 https://algopoly.com/?p=3169 The post WPP Cost Report – January 2026 appeared first on Algopoly.

]]>
WPP Cost Report

In this report, the forecast performances of wind power plants in our country were calculated using EPIAS Transparency Platform data. The main performance criteria are the average imbalance cost per MWh and FGPDA (Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Amount) (see Methodology).

If you would like to collect the data we used to create this report for your own analysis, you can send us your information by filling out the form here.

January 2026 Overall View

In the chart below, you can see the cost per unit of wind power plants in January 2026. The reference (median) unit cost of the power plant for this month was 129.68 TL / MWh. Unit costs of power plants (with some exceptions at the end) are increasing regularly. The top 3 power plants seem to be LODOS RES, ORDU-4 RES and GERMİYAN RES.

Information

  • Public data is used in all reports, and all data can be obtained from EPIAS Transparency Platform.
  • You can submit any comments, opinions, suggestions and correction requests regarding the reports by clicking here.
  • Although Algopoly pays utmost attention to compliance with its methodology and data quality in its calculations, it does not accept any legal responsibility for any loss or damage that may arise from these data and reports.
  • This report can be shared and used in presentations and reports by citing Algopoly as a source and linking to the relevant page, while preserving its integrity.

About Algopoly

Algopoly helps companies in 2 countries and 6 industries incorporate algorithms into their decisions. It develops models on consumption forecasting, K3 portfolio production forecasting, market forecasts and YEKDEM subjects for electricity market participants. You can contact us to get more information about our wind and solar production forecast models.

Calculation Methodology

In our report, the estimated unit cost is calculated using two cost items: \(IC\) (Imbalance Cost) and \(FGPDC\) (Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Cost). The calculation of these two cost items is as follows:

Imbalance Cost

First, let’s look at how the company’s imbalance quantity, \({IQ}_{t}\), is obtained. The quantity of imbalance is positive or negative depending on whether the production for any given hour is above or below the \(SBFGP\) value. We can express these two situations as follows:

If actual production is more than \(SBFGP\)

  • Positive imbalance quantity \({IQ}_{pos_t} = {Actual}_{t} - {SBFGP}_{t}\)

If actual production is lower than \(SBFGP\)

  • Negative imbalance quantity \({IQ}_{neg_t} = {SBFGP}_{t} - {Actual}_{t}\)

The calculation of the unit imbalance cost, \(UIC_t\), is determined not only by whether the imbalance quantity is positive or negative, but also by considering the System Direction and the applicable price limits (\(MPL\), \(V\), \(B\)) for the relevant settlement period. Accordingly, for any given hour, the unit negative and unit positive imbalance costs are calculated as follows:

  • Unit Negative Imbalance Cost

    • If \(max(MCP_t, SMP_{N,t}) = MPL_t\):

      \({UIC}_{neg_t} = (MPL_t \times 1.05) \times (1 + k)\)

    • Otherwise:

      \({UIC}_{neg_t} = max(V_t, MCP_t, SMP_{N,t}) \times (1 + k)\)

  • Unit Positive Imbalance Cost

    • If \(min(MCP_t, SMF_{P,t}) < V_t\):

      \({UIC}_{pos_t} = (-1) \times B_t \times (1 + l)\)

    • Otherwise:

      \({UIC}_{pos_t} = min(MCP_t, SMP_{P,t}) \times (1 - l)\)

  • Price Components Used

    \(SMP_{N,t} = max(SMP_t)\)

    \(SMP_{P,t} = min(SMP_t)\)

The coefficients \(k\) and \(l\) are applied in accordance with the rules determined by the Regulatory Authority, based on the System Direction of the relevant settlement period. Similarly, the parameters \(AFL\), \(V\), and \(B\) are also determined and applied by the Regulatory Authority for the corresponding settlement period.

By multiplying the imbalance quantity with the unit imbalance cost in line with the manufacturer’s imbalance direction, we obtain the imbalance cost for the hour, \({IC}_{t}\). The \(t\) value in the formulas can be considered as one hour. By summing these products over a time interval, we calculate the producer’s total imbalance cost for that time interval. We can consider this time period as the month when the report was published.

  • Total positive imbalance cost \({IC}_{pos} = \sum_t ({IQ}_{pos_t} * {UIC}_{pos_t})\)
  • Total negative imbalance cost \({IC}_{neg} = \sum_t ({IQ}_{neg_t} * {UIC}_{neg_t})\)

By adding up these positive and negative imbalance costs, we obtain the total imbalance cost.

  • Total imbalance cost \({IC} = {IC}_{pos} + {IC}_{neg}\)

Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Cost

\(FGPDC\) calculation is made based on \(SBFGP\) values for the WPPs within the scope of our report, since they are not subject to \(UR\) (Up Regulation) and \(DR\) (Down Regulation) instructions and do not have Secondary Frequency Control Reserve (SRDM). First, let’s look at the calculation of unit \(FGPDC\) for any hour:

  • Unit FGPDC \({UFGPDC}_{t} = max({MCP}_{t}, {SMP}_{t}, 750) * 0.03\)

To calculate \(FGPDC\), it is first necessary to calculate the imbalance tolerance. This tolerance amount represents the amount at which deviation from the expected production amount of the business, in our case \(SBFGP\), is not penalized and is calculated by taking 17% of \(SBFGP\).

  • Tolerance amount \({TA}_{t} = {SBFGP}_{t} * 0.17\)

If the negative or positive imbalance of the business does not exceed this tolerance amount, it is not subject to a penalty. However, if it is exceeded, it is punished based on the amount it exceeds the tolerance amount, and this amount is called \(FGPDA\).

  • \({FGPDC}_{t} = abs({SBPG}_{t} - {SBFGP}_{t}) - {TA}_{t}\)

By multiplying the unit \(FGPDC\) value by the \(FGPDA\) for that hour, we obtain the \(FGPDC\) value of the relevant hour. Similar to the imbalance cost, by summing these products over a time period, we calculate the total \(FGPDC\) of the producer for that time period.

  • \(FGPDC = \sum_t {UFGPDC}_{t} * {FGPDA}_{t}\)

Unit Cost

The total cost is obtained by adding the imbalance cost and \(FGPDC\), the calculations of which are shown above.

  • Total cost \(TC = IC + FGPDC\)

To obtain the unit cost, we need to divide the total cost we calculated by the total production, \(TP\):

  • Unit Cost \(UC = TC / TP\)

References

The post WPP Cost Report – January 2026 appeared first on Algopoly.

]]>
WPP Cost Report – December 2025 https://algopoly.com/wpp-cost-report-december-2025/ Mon, 19 Jan 2026 14:17:18 +0000 https://algopoly.com/?p=3164 The post WPP Cost Report – December 2025 appeared first on Algopoly.

]]>
WPP Cost Report

In this report, the forecast performances of wind power plants in our country were calculated using EPIAS Transparency Platform data. The main performance criteria are the average imbalance cost per MWh and FGPDA (Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Amount) (see Methodology).

If you would like to collect the data we used to create this report for your own analysis, you can send us your information by filling out the form here.

December 2025 Overall View

In the chart below, you can see the cost per unit of wind power plants in December 2025. The reference (median) unit cost of the power plant for this month was 121.84 TL / MWh. Unit costs of power plants (with some exceptions at the end) are increasing regularly. The top 3 power plants seem to be YENİ ELMALI RES, ELMALI RES and SEBENOBA RES.

Information

  • Public data is used in all reports, and all data can be obtained from EPIAS Transparency Platform.
  • You can submit any comments, opinions, suggestions and correction requests regarding the reports by clicking here.
  • Although Algopoly pays utmost attention to compliance with its methodology and data quality in its calculations, it does not accept any legal responsibility for any loss or damage that may arise from these data and reports.
  • This report can be shared and used in presentations and reports by citing Algopoly as a source and linking to the relevant page, while preserving its integrity.

About Algopoly

Algopoly helps companies in 2 countries and 6 industries incorporate algorithms into their decisions. It develops models on consumption forecasting, K3 portfolio production forecasting, market forecasts and YEKDEM subjects for electricity market participants. You can contact us to get more information about our wind and solar production forecast models.

Calculation Methodology

In our report, the estimated unit cost is calculated using two cost items: \(IC\) (Imbalance Cost) and \(FGPDC\) (Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Cost). The calculation of these two cost items is as follows:

Imbalance Cost

First, let’s look at how the company’s imbalance quantity, \({IQ}_{t}\), is obtained. The quantity of imbalance is positive or negative depending on whether the production for any given hour is above or below the \(SBFGP\) value. We can express these two situations as follows:

If actual production is more than \(SBFGP\)

  • Positive imbalance quantity \({IQ}_{pos_t} = {Actual}_{t} - {SBFGP}_{t}\)

If actual production is lower than \(SBFGP\)

  • Negative imbalance quantity \({IQ}_{neg_t} = {SBFGP}_{t} - {Actual}_{t}\)

Unit imbalance cost calculation, \({UIC}_{t}\), varies depending on whether the imbalance quantity is positive or negative. In these two cases, we can calculate the unit imbalance cost for any hour based on \({MCP}_{t}\) (Market Clearing Price) and \({SMP}_{t}\) (System Marginal Price) as follows:

  • Unit positive imbalance cost \({UIC}_{pos_t} = {MCP}_t - (min({MCP}_t, {SMP}_t)*0.97)\)
  • Unit negative imbalance cost \({UIC}_{neg_t} = (max({SMP}_t, {MCP}_t)*1.03) - {MCP}_t)\)

By multiplying the imbalance quantity with the unit imbalance cost in line with the manufacturer’s imbalance direction, we obtain the imbalance cost for the hour, \({IC}_{t}\). The \(t\) value in the formulas can be considered as one hour. By summing these products over a time interval, we calculate the producer’s total imbalance cost for that time interval. We can consider this time period as the month when the report was published.

  • Total positive imbalance cost \({IC}_{pos} = \sum_t ({IQ}_{pos_t} * {UIC}_{pos_t})\)
  • Total negative imbalance cost \({IC}_{neg} = \sum_t ({IQ}_{neg_t} * {UIC}_{neg_t})\)

By adding up these positive and negative imbalance costs, we obtain the total imbalance cost.

  • Total imbalance cost \({IC} = {IC}_{pos} + {IC}_{neg}\)

Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Cost

\(FGPDC\) calculation is made based on \(SBFGP\) values for the WPPs within the scope of our report, since they are not subject to \(UR\) (Up Regulation) and \(DR\) (Down Regulation) instructions and do not have Secondary Frequency Control Reserve (SRDM). First, let’s look at the calculation of unit \(FGPDC\) for any hour:

  • Unit FGPDC \({UFGPDC}_{t} = max({MCP}_{t}, {SMP}_{t}, 750) * 0.03\)

To calculate \(FGPDC\), it is first necessary to calculate the imbalance tolerance. This tolerance amount represents the amount at which deviation from the expected production amount of the business, in our case \(SBFGP\), is not penalized and is calculated by taking 17% of \(SBFGP\).

  • Tolerance amount \({TA}_{t} = {SBFGP}_{t} * 0.17\)

If the negative or positive imbalance of the business does not exceed this tolerance amount, it is not subject to a penalty. However, if it is exceeded, it is punished based on the amount it exceeds the tolerance amount, and this amount is called \(FGPDA\).

  • \({FGPDC}_{t} = abs({SBPG}_{t} - {SBFGP}_{t}) - {TA}_{t}\)

By multiplying the unit \(FGPDC\) value by the \(FGPDA\) for that hour, we obtain the \(FGPDC\) value of the relevant hour. Similar to the imbalance cost, by summing these products over a time period, we calculate the total \(FGPDC\) of the producer for that time period.

  • \(FGPDC = \sum_t {UFGPDC}_{t} * {FGPDA}_{t}\)

Unit Cost

The total cost is obtained by adding the imbalance cost and \(FGPDC\), the calculations of which are shown above.

  • Total cost \(TC = IC + FGPDC\)

To obtain the unit cost, we need to divide the total cost we calculated by the total production, \(TP\):

  • Unit Cost \(UC = TC / TP\)

References

The post WPP Cost Report – December 2025 appeared first on Algopoly.

]]>
WPP Cost Report – November 2025 https://algopoly.com/wpp-cost-report-november-2025/ Wed, 24 Dec 2025 07:38:03 +0000 https://algopoly.com/?p=3159 The post WPP Cost Report – November 2025 appeared first on Algopoly.

]]>
WPP Cost Report

In this report, the forecast performances of wind power plants in our country were calculated using EPIAS Transparency Platform data. The main performance criteria are the average imbalance cost per MWh and FGPDA (Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Amount) (see Methodology).

If you would like to collect the data we used to create this report for your own analysis, you can send us your information by filling out the form here.

November 2025 Overall View

In the chart below, you can see the cost per unit of wind power plants in November 2025. The reference (median) unit cost of the power plant for this month was 128.68 TL / MWh. Unit costs of power plants (with some exceptions at the end) are increasing regularly. The top 3 power plants seem to be KARLITEPE RES, ZELİHA RES and GÜLPINAR RES.

Information

  • Public data is used in all reports, and all data can be obtained from EPIAS Transparency Platform.
  • You can submit any comments, opinions, suggestions and correction requests regarding the reports by clicking here.
  • Although Algopoly pays utmost attention to compliance with its methodology and data quality in its calculations, it does not accept any legal responsibility for any loss or damage that may arise from these data and reports.
  • This report can be shared and used in presentations and reports by citing Algopoly as a source and linking to the relevant page, while preserving its integrity.

About Algopoly

Algopoly helps companies in 2 countries and 6 industries incorporate algorithms into their decisions. It develops models on consumption forecasting, K3 portfolio production forecasting, market forecasts and YEKDEM subjects for electricity market participants. You can contact us to get more information about our wind and solar production forecast models.

Calculation Methodology

In our report, the estimated unit cost is calculated using two cost items: \(IC\) (Imbalance Cost) and \(FGPDC\) (Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Cost). The calculation of these two cost items is as follows:

Imbalance Cost

First, let’s look at how the company’s imbalance quantity, \({IQ}_{t}\), is obtained. The quantity of imbalance is positive or negative depending on whether the production for any given hour is above or below the \(SBFGP\) value. We can express these two situations as follows:

If actual production is more than \(SBFGP\)

  • Positive imbalance quantity \({IQ}_{pos_t} = {Actual}_{t} - {SBFGP}_{t}\)

If actual production is lower than \(SBFGP\)

  • Negative imbalance quantity \({IQ}_{neg_t} = {SBFGP}_{t} - {Actual}_{t}\)

Unit imbalance cost calculation, \({UIC}_{t}\), varies depending on whether the imbalance quantity is positive or negative. In these two cases, we can calculate the unit imbalance cost for any hour based on \({MCP}_{t}\) (Market Clearing Price) and \({SMP}_{t}\) (System Marginal Price) as follows:

  • Unit positive imbalance cost \({UIC}_{pos_t} = {MCP}_t - (min({MCP}_t, {SMP}_t)*0.97)\)
  • Unit negative imbalance cost \({UIC}_{neg_t} = (max({SMP}_t, {MCP}_t)*1.03) - {MCP}_t)\)

By multiplying the imbalance quantity with the unit imbalance cost in line with the manufacturer’s imbalance direction, we obtain the imbalance cost for the hour, \({IC}_{t}\). The \(t\) value in the formulas can be considered as one hour. By summing these products over a time interval, we calculate the producer’s total imbalance cost for that time interval. We can consider this time period as the month when the report was published.

  • Total positive imbalance cost \({IC}_{pos} = \sum_t ({IQ}_{pos_t} * {UIC}_{pos_t})\)
  • Total negative imbalance cost \({IC}_{neg} = \sum_t ({IQ}_{neg_t} * {UIC}_{neg_t})\)

By adding up these positive and negative imbalance costs, we obtain the total imbalance cost.

  • Total imbalance cost \({IC} = {IC}_{pos} + {IC}_{neg}\)

Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Cost

\(FGPDC\) calculation is made based on \(SBFGP\) values for the WPPs within the scope of our report, since they are not subject to \(UR\) (Up Regulation) and \(DR\) (Down Regulation) instructions and do not have Secondary Frequency Control Reserve (SRDM). First, let’s look at the calculation of unit \(FGPDC\) for any hour:

  • Unit FGPDC \({UFGPDC}_{t} = max({MCP}_{t}, {SMP}_{t}, 750) * 0.03\)

To calculate \(FGPDC\), it is first necessary to calculate the imbalance tolerance. This tolerance amount represents the amount at which deviation from the expected production amount of the business, in our case \(SBFGP\), is not penalized and is calculated by taking 17% of \(SBFGP\).

  • Tolerance amount \({TA}_{t} = {SBFGP}_{t} * 0.17\)

If the negative or positive imbalance of the business does not exceed this tolerance amount, it is not subject to a penalty. However, if it is exceeded, it is punished based on the amount it exceeds the tolerance amount, and this amount is called \(FGPDA\).

  • \({FGPDC}_{t} = abs({SBPG}_{t} - {SBFGP}_{t}) - {TA}_{t}\)

By multiplying the unit \(FGPDC\) value by the \(FGPDA\) for that hour, we obtain the \(FGPDC\) value of the relevant hour. Similar to the imbalance cost, by summing these products over a time period, we calculate the total \(FGPDC\) of the producer for that time period.

  • \(FGPDC = \sum_t {UFGPDC}_{t} * {FGPDA}_{t}\)

Unit Cost

The total cost is obtained by adding the imbalance cost and \(FGPDC\), the calculations of which are shown above.

  • Total cost \(TC = IC + FGPDC\)

To obtain the unit cost, we need to divide the total cost we calculated by the total production, \(TP\):

  • Unit Cost \(UC = TC / TP\)

References

The post WPP Cost Report – November 2025 appeared first on Algopoly.

]]>
WPP Cost Report – October 2025 https://algopoly.com/wpp-cost-report-october-2025/ Wed, 19 Nov 2025 09:39:23 +0000 https://algopoly.com/?p=3150 The post WPP Cost Report – October 2025 appeared first on Algopoly.

]]>
WPP Cost Report

In this report, the forecast performances of wind power plants in our country were calculated using EPIAS Transparency Platform data. The main performance criteria are the average imbalance cost per MWh and FGPDA (Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Amount) (see Methodology).

If you would like to collect the data we used to create this report for your own analysis, you can send us your information by filling out the form here.

October 2025 Overall View

In the chart below, you can see the cost per unit of wind power plants in October 2025. The reference (median) unit cost of the power plant for this month was 135.47 TL / MWh. Unit costs of power plants (with some exceptions at the end) are increasing regularly. The top 3 power plants seem to be DENİZLİ RES, SERTAVUL RES and GÖKZİRVE RES.

Information

  • Public data is used in all reports, and all data can be obtained from EPIAS Transparency Platform.
  • You can submit any comments, opinions, suggestions and correction requests regarding the reports by clicking here.
  • Although Algopoly pays utmost attention to compliance with its methodology and data quality in its calculations, it does not accept any legal responsibility for any loss or damage that may arise from these data and reports.
  • This report can be shared and used in presentations and reports by citing Algopoly as a source and linking to the relevant page, while preserving its integrity.

About Algopoly

Algopoly helps companies in 2 countries and 6 industries incorporate algorithms into their decisions. It develops models on consumption forecasting, K3 portfolio production forecasting, market forecasts and YEKDEM subjects for electricity market participants. You can contact us to get more information about our wind and solar production forecast models.

Calculation Methodology

In our report, the estimated unit cost is calculated using two cost items: \(IC\) (Imbalance Cost) and \(FGPDC\) (Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Cost). The calculation of these two cost items is as follows:

Imbalance Cost

First, let’s look at how the company’s imbalance quantity, \({IQ}_{t}\), is obtained. The quantity of imbalance is positive or negative depending on whether the production for any given hour is above or below the \(SBFGP\) value. We can express these two situations as follows:

If actual production is more than \(SBFGP\)

  • Positive imbalance quantity \({IQ}_{pos_t} = {Actual}_{t} - {SBFGP}_{t}\)

If actual production is lower than \(SBFGP\)

  • Negative imbalance quantity \({IQ}_{neg_t} = {SBFGP}_{t} - {Actual}_{t}\)

Unit imbalance cost calculation, \({UIC}_{t}\), varies depending on whether the imbalance quantity is positive or negative. In these two cases, we can calculate the unit imbalance cost for any hour based on \({MCP}_{t}\) (Market Clearing Price) and \({SMP}_{t}\) (System Marginal Price) as follows:

  • Unit positive imbalance cost \({UIC}_{pos_t} = {MCP}_t - (min({MCP}_t, {SMP}_t)*0.97)\)
  • Unit negative imbalance cost \({UIC}_{neg_t} = (max({SMP}_t, {MCP}_t)*1.03) - {MCP}_t)\)

By multiplying the imbalance quantity with the unit imbalance cost in line with the manufacturer’s imbalance direction, we obtain the imbalance cost for the hour, \({IC}_{t}\). The \(t\) value in the formulas can be considered as one hour. By summing these products over a time interval, we calculate the producer’s total imbalance cost for that time interval. We can consider this time period as the month when the report was published.

  • Total positive imbalance cost \({IC}_{pos} = \sum_t ({IQ}_{pos_t} * {UIC}_{pos_t})\)
  • Total negative imbalance cost \({IC}_{neg} = \sum_t ({IQ}_{neg_t} * {UIC}_{neg_t})\)

By adding up these positive and negative imbalance costs, we obtain the total imbalance cost.

  • Total imbalance cost \({IC} = {IC}_{pos} + {IC}_{neg}\)

Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Cost

\(FGPDC\) calculation is made based on \(SBFGP\) values for the WPPs within the scope of our report, since they are not subject to \(UR\) (Up Regulation) and \(DR\) (Down Regulation) instructions and do not have Secondary Frequency Control Reserve (SRDM). First, let’s look at the calculation of unit \(FGPDC\) for any hour:

  • Unit FGPDC \({UFGPDC}_{t} = max({MCP}_{t}, {SMP}_{t}, 750) * 0.03\)

To calculate \(FGPDC\), it is first necessary to calculate the imbalance tolerance. This tolerance amount represents the amount at which deviation from the expected production amount of the business, in our case \(SBFGP\), is not penalized and is calculated by taking 17% of \(SBFGP\).

  • Tolerance amount \({TA}_{t} = {SBFGP}_{t} * 0.17\)

If the negative or positive imbalance of the business does not exceed this tolerance amount, it is not subject to a penalty. However, if it is exceeded, it is punished based on the amount it exceeds the tolerance amount, and this amount is called \(FGPDA\).

  • \({FGPDC}_{t} = abs({SBPG}_{t} - {SBFGP}_{t}) - {TA}_{t}\)

By multiplying the unit \(FGPDC\) value by the \(FGPDA\) for that hour, we obtain the \(FGPDC\) value of the relevant hour. Similar to the imbalance cost, by summing these products over a time period, we calculate the total \(FGPDC\) of the producer for that time period.

  • \(FGPDC = \sum_t {UFGPDC}_{t} * {FGPDA}_{t}\)

Unit Cost

The total cost is obtained by adding the imbalance cost and \(FGPDC\), the calculations of which are shown above.

  • Total cost \(TC = IC + FGPDC\)

To obtain the unit cost, we need to divide the total cost we calculated by the total production, \(TP\):

  • Unit Cost \(UC = TC / TP\)

References

The post WPP Cost Report – October 2025 appeared first on Algopoly.

]]>
WPP Cost Report – September 2025 https://algopoly.com/wpp-cost-report-september-2025/ Fri, 17 Oct 2025 09:53:18 +0000 https://algopoly.com/?p=3141 The post WPP Cost Report – September 2025 appeared first on Algopoly.

]]>
WPP Cost Report

In this report, the forecast performances of wind power plants in our country were calculated using EPIAS Transparency Platform data. The main performance criteria are the average imbalance cost per MWh and FGPDA (Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Amount) (see Methodology).

If you would like to collect the data we used to create this report for your own analysis, you can send us your information by filling out the form here.

September 2025 Overall View

In the chart below, you can see the cost per unit of wind power plants in September 2025. The reference (median) unit cost of the power plant for this month was 76.51 TL / MWh. Unit costs of power plants (with some exceptions at the end) are increasing regularly. The top 3 power plants seem to be KOCALAR RES, YENİKÖY RES and ALİBEY RES.

Information

  • Public data is used in all reports, and all data can be obtained from EPIAS Transparency Platform.
  • You can submit any comments, opinions, suggestions and correction requests regarding the reports by clicking here.
  • Although Algopoly pays utmost attention to compliance with its methodology and data quality in its calculations, it does not accept any legal responsibility for any loss or damage that may arise from these data and reports.
  • This report can be shared and used in presentations and reports by citing Algopoly as a source and linking to the relevant page, while preserving its integrity.

About Algopoly

Algopoly helps companies in 2 countries and 6 industries incorporate algorithms into their decisions. It develops models on consumption forecasting, K3 portfolio production forecasting, market forecasts and YEKDEM subjects for electricity market participants. You can contact us to get more information about our wind and solar production forecast models.

Calculation Methodology

In our report, the estimated unit cost is calculated using two cost items: \(IC\) (Imbalance Cost) and \(FGPDC\) (Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Cost). The calculation of these two cost items is as follows:

Imbalance Cost

First, let’s look at how the company’s imbalance quantity, \({IQ}_{t}\), is obtained. The quantity of imbalance is positive or negative depending on whether the production for any given hour is above or below the \(SBFGP\) value. We can express these two situations as follows:

If actual production is more than \(SBFGP\)

  • Positive imbalance quantity \({IQ}_{pos_t} = {Actual}_{t} - {SBFGP}_{t}\)

If actual production is lower than \(SBFGP\)

  • Negative imbalance quantity \({IQ}_{neg_t} = {SBFGP}_{t} - {Actual}_{t}\)

Unit imbalance cost calculation, \({UIC}_{t}\), varies depending on whether the imbalance quantity is positive or negative. In these two cases, we can calculate the unit imbalance cost for any hour based on \({MCP}_{t}\) (Market Clearing Price) and \({SMP}_{t}\) (System Marginal Price) as follows:

  • Unit positive imbalance cost \({UIC}_{pos_t} = {MCP}_t - (min({MCP}_t, {SMP}_t)*0.97)\)
  • Unit negative imbalance cost \({UIC}_{neg_t} = (max({SMP}_t, {MCP}_t)*1.03) - {MCP}_t)\)

By multiplying the imbalance quantity with the unit imbalance cost in line with the manufacturer’s imbalance direction, we obtain the imbalance cost for the hour, \({IC}_{t}\). The \(t\) value in the formulas can be considered as one hour. By summing these products over a time interval, we calculate the producer’s total imbalance cost for that time interval. We can consider this time period as the month when the report was published.

  • Total positive imbalance cost \({IC}_{pos} = \sum_t ({IQ}_{pos_t} * {UIC}_{pos_t})\)
  • Total negative imbalance cost \({IC}_{neg} = \sum_t ({IQ}_{neg_t} * {UIC}_{neg_t})\)

By adding up these positive and negative imbalance costs, we obtain the total imbalance cost.

  • Total imbalance cost \({IC} = {IC}_{pos} + {IC}_{neg}\)

Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Cost

\(FGPDC\) calculation is made based on \(SBFGP\) values for the WPPs within the scope of our report, since they are not subject to \(UR\) (Up Regulation) and \(DR\) (Down Regulation) instructions and do not have Secondary Frequency Control Reserve (SRDM). First, let’s look at the calculation of unit \(FGPDC\) for any hour:

  • Unit FGPDC \({UFGPDC}_{t} = max({MCP}_{t}, {SMP}_{t}) * 0.03\)

To calculate \(FGPDC\), it is first necessary to calculate the imbalance tolerance. This tolerance amount represents the amount at which deviation from the expected production amount of the business, in our case \(SBFGP\), is not penalized and is calculated by taking 17% of \(SBFGP\).

  • Tolerance amount \({TA}_{t} = {SBFGP}_{t} * 0.17\)

If the negative or positive imbalance of the business does not exceed this tolerance amount, it is not subject to a penalty. However, if it is exceeded, it is punished based on the amount it exceeds the tolerance amount, and this amount is called \(FGPDA\).

  • \({FGPDC}_{t} = abs({SBPG}_{t} - {SBFGP}_{t}) - {TA}_{t}\)

By multiplying the unit \(FGPDC\) value by the \(FGPDA\) for that hour, we obtain the \(FGPDC\) value of the relevant hour. Similar to the imbalance cost, by summing these products over a time period, we calculate the total \(FGPDC\) of the producer for that time period.

  • \(FGPDC = \sum_t {UFGPDC}_{t} * {FGPDA}_{t}\)

Unit Cost

The total cost is obtained by adding the imbalance cost and \(FGPDC\), the calculations of which are shown above.

  • Total cost \(TC = IC + FGPDC\)

To obtain the unit cost, we need to divide the total cost we calculated by the total production, \(TP\):

  • Unit Cost \(UC = TC / TP\)

References

The post WPP Cost Report – September 2025 appeared first on Algopoly.

]]>
WPP Cost Report – August 2025 https://algopoly.com/wpp-cost-report-august-2025/ Wed, 17 Sep 2025 14:07:26 +0000 https://algopoly.com/?p=3136 The post WPP Cost Report – August 2025 appeared first on Algopoly.

]]>
WPP Cost Report

In this report, the forecast performances of wind power plants in our country were calculated using EPIAS Transparency Platform data. The main performance criteria are the average imbalance cost per MWh and FGPDA (Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Amount) (see Methodology).

If you would like to collect the data we used to create this report for your own analysis, you can send us your information by filling out the form here.

August 2025 Overall View

In the chart below, you can see the cost per unit of wind power plants in August 2025. The reference (median) unit cost of the power plant for this month was 70.9 TL / MWh. Unit costs of power plants (with some exceptions at the end) are increasing regularly. The top 3 power plants seem to be MARMARA RES, SAROS RES and GAZİOSMANPAŞA RES.

Information

  • Public data is used in all reports, and all data can be obtained from EPIAS Transparency Platform.
  • You can submit any comments, opinions, suggestions and correction requests regarding the reports by clicking here.
  • Although Algopoly pays utmost attention to compliance with its methodology and data quality in its calculations, it does not accept any legal responsibility for any loss or damage that may arise from these data and reports.
  • This report can be shared and used in presentations and reports by citing Algopoly as a source and linking to the relevant page, while preserving its integrity.

About Algopoly

Algopoly helps companies in 2 countries and 6 industries incorporate algorithms into their decisions. It develops models on consumption forecasting, K3 portfolio production forecasting, market forecasts and YEKDEM subjects for electricity market participants. You can contact us to get more information about our wind and solar production forecast models.

Calculation Methodology

In our report, the estimated unit cost is calculated using two cost items: \(IC\) (Imbalance Cost) and \(FGPDC\) (Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Cost). The calculation of these two cost items is as follows:

Imbalance Cost

First, let’s look at how the company’s imbalance quantity, \({IQ}_{t}\), is obtained. The quantity of imbalance is positive or negative depending on whether the production for any given hour is above or below the \(SBFGP\) value. We can express these two situations as follows:

If actual production is more than \(SBFGP\)

  • Positive imbalance quantity \({IQ}_{pos_t} = {Actual}_{t} - {SBFGP}_{t}\)

If actual production is lower than \(SBFGP\)

  • Negative imbalance quantity \({IQ}_{neg_t} = {SBFGP}_{t} - {Actual}_{t}\)

Unit imbalance cost calculation, \({UIC}_{t}\), varies depending on whether the imbalance quantity is positive or negative. In these two cases, we can calculate the unit imbalance cost for any hour based on \({MCP}_{t}\) (Market Clearing Price) and \({SMP}_{t}\) (System Marginal Price) as follows:

  • Unit positive imbalance cost \({UIC}_{pos_t} = {MCP}_t - (({MCP}_t - {SMP}_t) * 0.97)\)
  • Unit negative imbalance cost \({UIC}_{neg_t} = (({SMP}_t - {MCP}_t) * 1.03) - {MCP}_t)\)

By multiplying the imbalance quantity with the unit imbalance cost in line with the manufacturer’s imbalance direction, we obtain the imbalance cost for the hour, \({IC}_{t}\). The \(t\) value in the formulas can be considered as one hour. By summing these products over a time interval, we calculate the producer’s total imbalance cost for that time interval. We can consider this time period as the month when the report was published.

  • Total positive imbalance cost \({IC}_{pos} = \sum_t ({IQ}_{pos_t} * {UIC}_{pos_t})\)
  • Total negative imbalance cost \({IC}_{neg} = \sum_t ({IQ}_{neg_t} * {UIC}_{neg_t})\)

By adding up these positive and negative imbalance costs, we obtain the total imbalance cost.

  • Total imbalance cost \({IC} = {IC}_{pos} + {IC}_{neg}\)

Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Cost

\(FGPDC\) calculation is made based on \(SBFGP\) values for the WPPs within the scope of our report, since they are not subject to \(UR\) (Up Regulation) and \(DR\) (Down Regulation) instructions and do not have Secondary Frequency Control Reserve (SRDM). First, let’s look at the calculation of unit \(FGPDC\) for any hour:

  • Unit FGPDC \({UFGPDC}_{t} = max({MCP}_{t}, {SMP}_{t}) * 0.03\)

To calculate \(FGPDC\), it is first necessary to calculate the imbalance tolerance. This tolerance amount represents the amount at which deviation from the expected production amount of the business, in our case \(SBFGP\), is not penalized and is calculated by taking 17% of \(SBFGP\).

  • Tolerance amount \({TA}_{t} = {SBFGP}_{t} * 0.17\)

If the negative or positive imbalance of the business does not exceed this tolerance amount, it is not subject to a penalty. However, if it is exceeded, it is punished based on the amount it exceeds the tolerance amount, and this amount is called \(FGPDA\).

  • \({FGPDC}_{t} = abs({SBPG}_{t} - {SBFGP}_{t}) - {TA}_{t}\)

By multiplying the unit \(FGPDC\) value by the \(FGPDA\) for that hour, we obtain the \(FGPDC\) value of the relevant hour. Similar to the imbalance cost, by summing these products over a time period, we calculate the total \(FGPDC\) of the producer for that time period.

  • \(FGPDC = \sum_t {UFGPDC}_{t} * {FGPDA}_{t}\)

Unit Cost

The total cost is obtained by adding the imbalance cost and \(FGPDC\), the calculations of which are shown above.

  • Total cost \(TC = IC + FGPDC\)

To obtain the unit cost, we need to divide the total cost we calculated by the total production, \(TP\):

  • Unit Cost \(UC = TC / TP\)

References

The post WPP Cost Report – August 2025 appeared first on Algopoly.

]]>
WPP Cost Report – July 2025 https://algopoly.com/wpp-cost-report-july-2025/ Tue, 19 Aug 2025 08:25:53 +0000 https://algopoly.com/?p=3131 The post WPP Cost Report – July 2025 appeared first on Algopoly.

]]>
WPP Cost Report

In this report, the forecast performances of wind power plants in our country were calculated using EPIAS Transparency Platform data. The main performance criteria are the average imbalance cost per MWh and FGPDA (Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Amount) (see Methodology).

If you would like to collect the data we used to create this report for your own analysis, you can send us your information by filling out the form here.

July 2025 Overall View

In the chart below, you can see the cost per unit of wind power plants in July 2025. The reference (median) unit cost of the power plant for this month was 73.65 TL / MWh. Unit costs of power plants (with some exceptions at the end) are increasing regularly. The top 3 power plants seem to be BELEN RES, ALİBEY RES and KOCALAR RES.

Information

  • Public data is used in all reports, and all data can be obtained from EPIAS Transparency Platform.
  • You can submit any comments, opinions, suggestions and correction requests regarding the reports by clicking here.
  • Although Algopoly pays utmost attention to compliance with its methodology and data quality in its calculations, it does not accept any legal responsibility for any loss or damage that may arise from these data and reports.
  • This report can be shared and used in presentations and reports by citing Algopoly as a source and linking to the relevant page, while preserving its integrity.

About Algopoly

Algopoly helps companies in 2 countries and 6 industries incorporate algorithms into their decisions. It develops models on consumption forecasting, K3 portfolio production forecasting, market forecasts and YEKDEM subjects for electricity market participants. You can contact us to get more information about our wind and solar production forecast models.

Calculation Methodology

In our report, the estimated unit cost is calculated using two cost items: \(IC\) (Imbalance Cost) and \(FGPDC\) (Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Cost). The calculation of these two cost items is as follows:

Imbalance Cost

First, let’s look at how the company’s imbalance quantity, \({IQ}_{t}\), is obtained. The quantity of imbalance is positive or negative depending on whether the production for any given hour is above or below the \(SBFGP\) value. We can express these two situations as follows:

If actual production is more than \(SBFGP\)

  • Positive imbalance quantity \({IQ}_{pos_t} = {Actual}_{t} - {SBFGP}_{t}\)

If actual production is lower than \(SBFGP\)

  • Negative imbalance quantity \({IQ}_{neg_t} = {SBFGP}_{t} - {Actual}_{t}\)

Unit imbalance cost calculation, \({UIC}_{t}\), varies depending on whether the imbalance quantity is positive or negative. In these two cases, we can calculate the unit imbalance cost for any hour based on \({MCP}_{t}\) (Market Clearing Price) and \({SMP}_{t}\) (System Marginal Price) as follows:

  • Unit positive imbalance cost \({UIC}_{pos_t} = {MCP}_t - (({MCP}_t - {SMP}_t) * 0.97)\)
  • Unit negative imbalance cost \({UIC}_{neg_t} = (({SMP}_t - {MCP}_t) * 1.03) - {MCP}_t)\)

By multiplying the imbalance quantity with the unit imbalance cost in line with the manufacturer’s imbalance direction, we obtain the imbalance cost for the hour, \({IC}_{t}\). The \(t\) value in the formulas can be considered as one hour. By summing these products over a time interval, we calculate the producer’s total imbalance cost for that time interval. We can consider this time period as the month when the report was published.

  • Total positive imbalance cost \({IC}_{pos} = \sum_t ({IQ}_{pos_t} * {UIC}_{pos_t})\)
  • Total negative imbalance cost \({IC}_{neg} = \sum_t ({IQ}_{neg_t} * {UIC}_{neg_t})\)

By adding up these positive and negative imbalance costs, we obtain the total imbalance cost.

  • Total imbalance cost \({IC} = {IC}_{pos} + {IC}_{neg}\)

Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Cost

\(FGPDC\) calculation is made based on \(SBFGP\) values for the WPPs within the scope of our report, since they are not subject to \(UR\) (Up Regulation) and \(DR\) (Down Regulation) instructions and do not have Secondary Frequency Control Reserve (SRDM). First, let’s look at the calculation of unit \(FGPDC\) for any hour:

  • Unit FGPDC \({UFGPDC}_{t} = max({MCP}_{t}, {SMP}_{t}) * 0.03\)

To calculate \(FGPDC\), it is first necessary to calculate the imbalance tolerance. This tolerance amount represents the amount at which deviation from the expected production amount of the business, in our case \(SBFGP\), is not penalized and is calculated by taking 17% of \(SBFGP\).

  • Tolerance amount \({TA}_{t} = {SBFGP}_{t} * 0.17\)

If the negative or positive imbalance of the business does not exceed this tolerance amount, it is not subject to a penalty. However, if it is exceeded, it is punished based on the amount it exceeds the tolerance amount, and this amount is called \(FGPDA\).

  • \({FGPDC}_{t} = abs({SBPG}_{t} - {SBFGP}_{t}) - {TA}_{t}\)

By multiplying the unit \(FGPDC\) value by the \(FGPDA\) for that hour, we obtain the \(FGPDC\) value of the relevant hour. Similar to the imbalance cost, by summing these products over a time period, we calculate the total \(FGPDC\) of the producer for that time period.

  • \(FGPDC = \sum_t {UFGPDC}_{t} * {FGPDA}_{t}\)

Unit Cost

The total cost is obtained by adding the imbalance cost and \(FGPDC\), the calculations of which are shown above.

  • Total cost \(TC = IC + FGPDC\)

To obtain the unit cost, we need to divide the total cost we calculated by the total production, \(TP\):

  • Unit Cost \(UC = TC / TP\)

References

The post WPP Cost Report – July 2025 appeared first on Algopoly.

]]>
WPP Cost Report – June 2025 https://algopoly.com/wpp-cost-report-june-2025/ Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:44:05 +0000 https://algopoly.com/?p=3124 The post WPP Cost Report – June 2025 appeared first on Algopoly.

]]>
WPP Cost Report

In this report, the forecast performances of wind power plants in our country were calculated using EPIAS Transparency Platform data. The main performance criteria are the average imbalance cost per MWh and FGPDA (Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Amount) (see Methodology).

If you would like to collect the data we used to create this report for your own analysis, you can send us your information by filling out the form here.

June 2025 Overall View

In the chart below, you can see the cost per unit of wind power plants in June 2025. The reference (median) unit cost of the power plant for this month was 96.73 TL / MWh. Unit costs of power plants (with some exceptions at the end) are increasing regularly. The top 3 power plants seem to be ALİBEY RES, OVACIK RES and MERSİN RES.

Information

  • Public data is used in all reports, and all data can be obtained from EPIAS Transparency Platform.
  • You can submit any comments, opinions, suggestions and correction requests regarding the reports by clicking here.
  • Although Algopoly pays utmost attention to compliance with its methodology and data quality in its calculations, it does not accept any legal responsibility for any loss or damage that may arise from these data and reports.
  • This report can be shared and used in presentations and reports by citing Algopoly as a source and linking to the relevant page, while preserving its integrity.

About Algopoly

Algopoly helps companies in 2 countries and 6 industries incorporate algorithms into their decisions. It develops models on consumption forecasting, K3 portfolio production forecasting, market forecasts and YEKDEM subjects for electricity market participants. You can contact us to get more information about our wind and solar production forecast models.

Calculation Methodology

In our report, the estimated unit cost is calculated using two cost items: \(IC\) (Imbalance Cost) and \(FGPDC\) (Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Cost). The calculation of these two cost items is as follows:

Imbalance Cost

First, let’s look at how the company’s imbalance quantity, \({IQ}_{t}\), is obtained. The quantity of imbalance is positive or negative depending on whether the production for any given hour is above or below the \(SBFGP\) value. We can express these two situations as follows:

If actual production is more than \(SBFGP\)

  • Positive imbalance quantity \({IQ}_{pos_t} = {Actual}_{t} - {SBFGP}_{t}\)

If actual production is lower than \(SBFGP\)

  • Negative imbalance quantity \({IQ}_{neg_t} = {SBFGP}_{t} - {Actual}_{t}\)

Unit imbalance cost calculation, \({UIC}_{t}\), varies depending on whether the imbalance quantity is positive or negative. In these two cases, we can calculate the unit imbalance cost for any hour based on \({MCP}_{t}\) (Market Clearing Price) and \({SMP}_{t}\) (System Marginal Price) as follows:

  • Unit positive imbalance cost \({UIC}_{pos_t} = {MCP}_t - (({MCP}_t - {SMP}_t) * 0.97)\)
  • Unit negative imbalance cost \({UIC}_{neg_t} = (({SMP}_t - {MCP}_t) * 1.03) - {MCP}_t)\)

By multiplying the imbalance quantity with the unit imbalance cost in line with the manufacturer’s imbalance direction, we obtain the imbalance cost for the hour, \({IC}_{t}\). The \(t\) value in the formulas can be considered as one hour. By summing these products over a time interval, we calculate the producer’s total imbalance cost for that time interval. We can consider this time period as the month when the report was published.

  • Total positive imbalance cost \({IC}_{pos} = \sum_t ({IQ}_{pos_t} * {UIC}_{pos_t})\)
  • Total negative imbalance cost \({IC}_{neg} = \sum_t ({IQ}_{neg_t} * {UIC}_{neg_t})\)

By adding up these positive and negative imbalance costs, we obtain the total imbalance cost.

  • Total imbalance cost \({IC} = {IC}_{pos} + {IC}_{neg}\)

Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Cost

\(FGPDC\) calculation is made based on \(SBFGP\) values for the WPPs within the scope of our report, since they are not subject to \(UR\) (Up Regulation) and \(DR\) (Down Regulation) instructions and do not have Secondary Frequency Control Reserve (SRDM). First, let’s look at the calculation of unit \(FGPDC\) for any hour:

  • Unit FGPDC \({UFGPDC}_{t} = max({MCP}_{t}, {SMP}_{t}) * 0.03\)

To calculate \(FGPDC\), it is first necessary to calculate the imbalance tolerance. This tolerance amount represents the amount at which deviation from the expected production amount of the business, in our case \(SBFGP\), is not penalized and is calculated by taking 17% of \(SBFGP\).

  • Tolerance amount \({TA}_{t} = {SBFGP}_{t} * 0.17\)

If the negative or positive imbalance of the business does not exceed this tolerance amount, it is not subject to a penalty. However, if it is exceeded, it is punished based on the amount it exceeds the tolerance amount, and this amount is called \(FGPDA\).

  • \({FGPDC}_{t} = abs({SBPG}_{t} - {SBFGP}_{t}) - {TA}_{t}\)

By multiplying the unit \(FGPDC\) value by the \(FGPDA\) for that hour, we obtain the \(FGPDC\) value of the relevant hour. Similar to the imbalance cost, by summing these products over a time period, we calculate the total \(FGPDC\) of the producer for that time period.

  • \(FGPDC = \sum_t {UFGPDC}_{t} * {FGPDA}_{t}\)

Unit Cost

The total cost is obtained by adding the imbalance cost and \(FGPDC\), the calculations of which are shown above.

  • Total cost \(TC = IC + FGPDC\)

To obtain the unit cost, we need to divide the total cost we calculated by the total production, \(TP\):

  • Unit Cost \(UC = TC / TP\)

References

The post WPP Cost Report – June 2025 appeared first on Algopoly.

]]>
Solar Power Forecasting: Methods, Difficulties and Results https://algopoly.com/solar-power-forecasting-methods-difficulties-and-results/ Thu, 26 Jun 2025 07:43:06 +0000 https://algopoly.com/?p=3110 Solar Power Forecasting: Methods, Difficulties and Results An essential source of power, the sun is rapidly becoming the cornerstone of our global energy transition. As solar energy adoption continues its exponential growth, the ability to accurately predict its output – a discipline known as solar power forecasting – has emerged as a critical enabler for [...]

The post Solar Power Forecasting: Methods, Difficulties and Results appeared first on Algopoly.

]]>
Solar Power Forecasting: Methods, Difficulties and Results

An essential source of power, the sun is rapidly becoming the cornerstone of our global energy transition. As solar energy adoption continues its exponential growth, the ability to accurately predict its output – a discipline known as solar power forecasting – has emerged as a critical enabler for grid operators, energy traders, and renewable asset owners. At a critical time when we are increasingly dependent on clean energy, precision in forecasting is not only an advantage, but also a necessity to maintain grid stability, optimize energy markets and accelerate the transition away from fossil fuels.

This comprehensive blog post will explore the pressing need for accurate solar power forecasting, delve into the primary methods used, discuss ongoing difficulties, and examine performance results in this crucial field.

The Essential Role of Solar Power Forecasting

The inherent intermittency of solar energy – its dependence on daylight, cloud cover, and other atmospheric conditions – presents a significant challenge for grid management. Without accurate predictions of how much solar power will be available at any given time, balancing supply and demand becomes a formidable task, leading to potential grid instability, increased operational costs, and even curtailment of renewable generation. This is where solar power forecasting steps in, acting as the intelligent bridge between variable renewable generation and a stable, efficient power grid.

The need for precise solar power forecasting is driven by several key factors:

Grid Stability and Reliability

Grid operators require accurate forecasts to ensure a constant balance between electricity generation and consumption. Unexpected dips or surges in solar energy output can lead to voltage fluctuations, frequency deviations, and even blackouts. Reliable forecasts allow operators to pre-emptively adjust conventional power plant output, dispatch battery storage, or manage demand response, thus maintaining grid equilibrium. This forecast helps reduce the need for excessive balancing reserves, leading to significant cost savings and increased grid efficiency, as highlighted by a European Union Agency for the Space Programme (EUSPA) report on solar power forecasting [EUSPA, “Solar Synergy: How Copernicus Data Powers Smarter Grid Balancing“, 2025].

Economic Optimization

For energy traders and power plant owners, accurate solar power forecasting translates directly into financial gains. Knowing future solar output enables them to optimize bidding strategies in electricity markets, buy or sell power at favorable prices, and minimize imbalance penalties. Conversely, inaccurate forecasts can result in costly penalties and lost revenue opportunities, stressing the economic importance of precise solar power forecasting.

Integration of Renewables

As the penetration of solar energy in the grid increases, the impact of its variability becomes more pronounced. Advanced forecasting techniques are essential to integrate large volumes of solar power without compromising the grid’s integrity, paving the way for a truly renewable-dominated energy system. Studies indicate that improved forecasting can significantly reduce inefficiencies, enhance grid reliability, and optimize energy distribution.

Resource Management

For large-scale solar farms, solar power forecasting aids in operational planning, including scheduling maintenance during periods of low energy production to minimize economic losses, optimizing inverter performance, and managing battery storage systems effectively. This proactive approach extends asset life and maximizes energy yield.

Key Methods in Solar Power Forecasting

The methodologies employed in solar power forecasting range from simple statistical approaches to complex data-driven models, each suited to different forecasting horizons and data availability.

Statistical Methods

Traditional statistical models use historical data to identify patterns and predict future outcomes.

  • Time Series Models: Methods like AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) and Exponential Smoothing analyze past power generation data to project future values. These are often used for very short-term forecasts (minutes to hours).
  • Regression Models: These models establish relationships between solar power output and various meteorological parameters (e.g., irradiance, temperature). While straightforward, their accuracy can be limited by non-linear relationships.

Physical Methods

Physical models rely on numerical weather prediction (NWP) models and atmospheric physics to simulate solar irradiance and, subsequently, power output.

  • NWP Integration: High-resolution NWP models provide forecasts for parameters like cloud cover, solar radiation, and temperature. These forecasts are then fed into power conversion models specific to the solar plant’s characteristics. 
  • Satellite Imagery: Satellite data, particularly from geostationary satellites, provides crucial real-time information on cloud movement and atmospheric conditions, enhancing the accuracy of irradiance forecasts, especially for short-term predictions.

Hybrid Methods

Many modern solar power forecasting systems combine elements from both statistical and physical approaches to leverage their respective strengths.

  • Model Blending: This involves combining forecasts from multiple models (e.g., a statistical model with a physical model) to reduce overall error. Hybrid models, for instance, can integrate physical insights with data-driven learning for enhanced results.
  • Machine Learning Integration: While not the sole focus, machine learning techniques often enhance these hybrid models by processing large datasets and identifying complex patterns that traditional methods might miss. For example, some models use machine learning to post-process raw NWP data, correcting biases and improving accuracy.

Difficulties in Solar Power Forecasting

Despite significant advancements, several difficulties persist in achieving perfect solar power forecasting:

  • Weather Variability: The unpredictable nature of weather, especially sudden changes in cloud cover, fog, or aerosols, remains the primary difficulty. Even highly sophisticated NWP models have limitations in forecasting localized, rapid weather events. The accuracy of solar power forecasting is directly tied to the precision of weather predictions.
  • Data Quality and Availability: The quality and density of meteorological data, particularly for remote or newly deployed solar sites, can be insufficient. Gaps in historical data or sensor malfunctions can significantly impact model training and performance.
  • Site-Specific Factors: Each solar installation has unique characteristics, including panel degradation, soiling (dust and dirt accumulation), shading from nearby structures, and inverter performance, which all influence actual power output and are difficult to model accurately without highly granular site data. High temperatures can decrease solar panel efficiency, and dust necessitates cleaning cycles, both of which affect output and need to be considered.
  • Forecasting Horizon: The accuracy of forecasts generally decreases with longer horizons. Short-term forecasts (minutes to hours) are crucial for real-time grid operations, while long-term forecasts (days to weeks) are vital for market bidding and maintenance scheduling, each presenting different difficulties.
  • Computational Resources: Running complex physical and data-driven models, especially for large portfolios of solar plants, requires significant computational power and infrastructure.

Performance Results and Market Trends

The performance of solar power forecasting models is typically evaluated using metrics such as Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). Continual improvements in these metrics are vital for economic viability and grid reliability. For instance, studies show that advanced models can achieve MAE as low as 0.13 and MAPE of 0.6 for 24-hour forecasts.

The global solar energy market is experiencing unprecedented growth, directly fueling the demand for sophisticated solar power forecasting solutions.

  • Record Installations: Global solar PV installations reached nearly 600 GW in 2024, a 33% increase over 2023, with solar contributing 81% of all new renewable capacity worldwide. This growth is projected to continue, with installations reaching 655 GW in 2025, and an anticipated 930 GW by 2029. 
  • Market Size: The global solar energy market size was estimated at USD 121.99 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach around USD 389.86 billion by 2034, growing at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 12.32% from 2025 to 2034.
  • Regional Dominance: The Asia-Pacific region, led by China, continues to dominate global solar deployment, accounting for 70% of new capacity additions in 2024. China alone added 329 GW of solar capacity in 2024, representing 55% of global installations. The Americas also saw significant growth (40%), with the US adding 8.6 GW of new solar module manufacturing capacity in Q1 2025. This widespread adoption across continents underscores the universal need for reliable solar power forecasting.

Looking Ahead: The Future of Solar Power Forecasting

The journey of solar power forecasting is far from over. As the world aims for ambitious renewable energy targets – such as the Global Solar Council’s aspiration of 8 TW by 2030, requiring roughly 1 TW of new installations per year – the demand for even more sophisticated and granular forecasting will only intensify.

Future developments in solar power forecasting will likely include:

  • Hyperlocal Forecasting: More localized and micro-scale forecasts to account for microclimates and specific site conditions, leveraging real-time sensor integration for enhanced predictions.
  • Probabilistic Forecasting: Moving beyond single-point predictions to provide uncertainty ranges, enabling more robust risk management strategies for grid operators and traders.
  • Integration with Advanced Grid Controls: Tighter coupling of forecasting models with automated grid control systems for real-time, adaptive management of renewable assets. This includes smart grid systems for efficient energy redistribution and optimizing trackers for panel inclination.
  • Multi-energy System Forecasting: Expanding forecasting capabilities to include not just solar, but also wind, hydro, and demand-side management, for holistic energy system optimization.

The future of energy is undeniably solar, and accurate solar power forecasting is the key to ensuring its reliability and sustainability. By continuously investing in research and development and collaborating with industry leaders and research institutions, we can collectively unlock the full, transformative potential of solar power.

The post Solar Power Forecasting: Methods, Difficulties and Results appeared first on Algopoly.

]]>
WPP Cost Report – May 2025 https://algopoly.com/wpp-cost-report-may-2025/ Wed, 18 Jun 2025 08:39:19 +0000 https://algopoly.com/?p=3107 The post WPP Cost Report – May 2025 appeared first on Algopoly.

]]>
WPP Cost Report

In this report, the forecast performances of wind power plants in our country were calculated using EPIAS Transparency Platform data. The main performance criteria are the average imbalance cost per MWh and FGPDA (Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Amount) (see Methodology).

If you would like to collect the data we used to create this report for your own analysis, you can send us your information by filling out the form here.

May 2025 Overall View

In the chart below, you can see the cost per unit of wind power plants in May 2025. The reference (median) unit cost of the power plant for this month was 140.45 TL / MWh. Unit costs of power plants (with some exceptions at the end) are increasing regularly. The top 3 power plants seem to be GELİBOLU RES AYVACIK, G RES and SOMA RES.

Information

  • Public data is used in all reports, and all data can be obtained from EPIAS Transparency Platform.
  • You can submit any comments, opinions, suggestions and correction requests regarding the reports by clicking here.
  • Although Algopoly pays utmost attention to compliance with its methodology and data quality in its calculations, it does not accept any legal responsibility for any loss or damage that may arise from these data and reports.
  • This report can be shared and used in presentations and reports by citing Algopoly as a source and linking to the relevant page, while preserving its integrity.

About Algopoly

Algopoly helps companies in 2 countries and 6 industries incorporate algorithms into their decisions. It develops models on consumption forecasting, K3 portfolio production forecasting, market forecasts and YEKDEM subjects for electricity market participants. You can contact us to get more information about our wind and solar production forecast models.

Calculation Methodology

In our report, the estimated unit cost is calculated using two cost items: \(IC\) (Imbalance Cost) and \(FGPDC\) (Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Cost). The calculation of these two cost items is as follows:

Imbalance Cost

First, let’s look at how the company’s imbalance quantity, \({IQ}_{t}\), is obtained. The quantity of imbalance is positive or negative depending on whether the production for any given hour is above or below the \(SBFGP\) value. We can express these two situations as follows:

If actual production is more than \(SBFGP\)

  • Positive imbalance quantity \({IQ}_{pos_t} = {Actual}_{t} - {SBFGP}_{t}\)

If actual production is lower than \(SBFGP\)

  • Negative imbalance quantity \({IQ}_{neg_t} = {SBFGP}_{t} - {Actual}_{t}\)

Unit imbalance cost calculation, \({UIC}_{t}\), varies depending on whether the imbalance quantity is positive or negative. In these two cases, we can calculate the unit imbalance cost for any hour based on \({MCP}_{t}\) (Market Clearing Price) and \({SMP}_{t}\) (System Marginal Price) as follows:

  • Unit positive imbalance cost \({UIC}_{pos_t} = {MCP}_t - (({MCP}_t - {SMP}_t) * 0.97)\)
  • Unit negative imbalance cost \({UIC}_{neg_t} = (({SMP}_t - {MCP}_t) * 1.03) - {MCP}_t)\)

By multiplying the imbalance quantity with the unit imbalance cost in line with the manufacturer’s imbalance direction, we obtain the imbalance cost for the hour, \({IC}_{t}\). The \(t\) value in the formulas can be considered as one hour. By summing these products over a time interval, we calculate the producer’s total imbalance cost for that time interval. We can consider this time period as the month when the report was published.

  • Total positive imbalance cost \({IC}_{pos} = \sum_t ({IQ}_{pos_t} * {UIC}_{pos_t})\)
  • Total negative imbalance cost \({IC}_{neg} = \sum_t ({IQ}_{neg_t} * {UIC}_{neg_t})\)

By adding up these positive and negative imbalance costs, we obtain the total imbalance cost.

  • Total imbalance cost \({IC} = {IC}_{pos} + {IC}_{neg}\)

Finalized Generation Plan Deviation Cost

\(FGPDC\) calculation is made based on \(SBFGP\) values for the WPPs within the scope of our report, since they are not subject to \(UR\) (Up Regulation) and \(DR\) (Down Regulation) instructions and do not have Secondary Frequency Control Reserve (SRDM). First, let’s look at the calculation of unit \(FGPDC\) for any hour:

  • Unit FGPDC \({UFGPDC}_{t} = max({MCP}_{t}, {SMP}_{t}) * 0.03\)

To calculate \(FGPDC\), it is first necessary to calculate the imbalance tolerance. This tolerance amount represents the amount at which deviation from the expected production amount of the business, in our case \(SBFGP\), is not penalized and is calculated by taking 17% of \(SBFGP\).

  • Tolerance amount \({TA}_{t} = {SBFGP}_{t} * 0.17\)

If the negative or positive imbalance of the business does not exceed this tolerance amount, it is not subject to a penalty. However, if it is exceeded, it is punished based on the amount it exceeds the tolerance amount, and this amount is called \(FGPDA\).

  • \({FGPDC}_{t} = abs({SBPG}_{t} - {SBFGP}_{t}) - {TA}_{t}\)

By multiplying the unit \(FGPDC\) value by the \(FGPDA\) for that hour, we obtain the \(FGPDC\) value of the relevant hour. Similar to the imbalance cost, by summing these products over a time period, we calculate the total \(FGPDC\) of the producer for that time period.

  • \(FGPDC = \sum_t {UFGPDC}_{t} * {FGPDA}_{t}\)

Unit Cost

The total cost is obtained by adding the imbalance cost and \(FGPDC\), the calculations of which are shown above.

  • Total cost \(TC = IC + FGPDC\)

To obtain the unit cost, we need to divide the total cost we calculated by the total production, \(TP\):

  • Unit Cost \(UC = TC / TP\)

References

The post WPP Cost Report – May 2025 appeared first on Algopoly.

]]>