Risk Infrastructure for
DeFi Yield Markets
Morpho
Gauntlet
Chainlink
Aave
Steakhouse Financial
Pyth
Spark
Re7 Labs
API3
Compound
Yearn
Uniswap
Sentora
Beefy
Philidor
MakerDAOMorphoGauntletChainlinkAaveSteakhouse FinancialPythSparkRe7 LabsAPI3CompoundYearnUniswapSentoraBeefyPhilidorMakerDAOMorphoGauntletChainlinkAaveSteakhouse FinancialPythSparkRe7 LabsAPI3CompoundYearnUniswapSentoraBeefyPhilidorMakerDAODiscover protocols
Each protocol is integrated through a dedicated adapter — purpose-built to extract share price accrual, reward decomposition, and on-chain event streams in a format consistent with our risk framework. Coverage spans Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, and Avalanche.
Aave
LendingSupply-side lending across V3 deployments on Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, and Avalanche.
Morpho
LendingCurated lending vaults with isolated risk markets on Ethereum and Base.
Spark
Lending & SavingsSparkLend markets and Spark Savings vaults (sUSDS, sUSDC, spUSDC, spUSDT) across Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, and Optimism.
Compound
LendingSupply-side lending markets on Ethereum and Base via Compound V3 (Comet) isolated deployments.
Uniswap
LiquidityAMM liquidity provision across V2, V3, and V4 deployments on Ethereum, Base, and Arbitrum.
Yearn
Yield AggregationV3 vaults on Ethereum with automated yield strategies across lending and liquidity provision.
Beefy
Yield OptimizationAuto-compounding vaults across Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon, and Avalanche.
Your protocol here?
Contact us →What We Do Differently
No Self-Reported Data
Every metric derives from on-chain state or audited protocol APIs. We verify share price appreciation directly — not projected yields, not protocol marketing numbers.
Multi-Vector Risk Decomposition
Each vault is scored across three independent risk vectors: asset composition, platform security, and governance controls. The framework is deterministic — same inputs, same score, every time.
Realized Performance, Not Projections
APY is calculated from historical share price changes, reflecting actual depositor returns net of fees and slippage. Forward-looking estimates are labeled as such.
Open Methodology
Scoring criteria, vector weights, and tier thresholds are publicly documented. We invite scrutiny — if the model is wrong, we want to know.
Risk Tier Framework
Vaults are classified into three tiers based on a weighted composite score across asset quality, code maturity, and governance structure. The tiers define a risk spectrum, not a recommendation.
Battle-tested code (2+ years), multiple independent audits, timelocked governance. Represents the lowest-risk segment of on-chain yield.
Audited protocols with shorter track records or more permissive governance. Acceptable risk-return for most allocators.
Newer code, limited audit coverage, or concentrated admin powers. Higher yield often compensates for elevated tail risk.
Vector Decomposition
Illustrative scoring for a Prime-tier lending vault
Operating Principles
The constraints we impose on ourselves to maintain credibility.
No Pay-to-Play
Protocols cannot pay for listings, higher scores, or preferential placement. Revenue never influences risk output.
Data Over Narrative
Scores are derived from measurable on-chain state. Team reputation, social following, and marketing spend are not inputs.
Protocol Agnostic
The same methodology applies to every protocol. No exceptions, no special treatment, no editorial discretion on scores.
Continuous Monitoring
Risk scores update automatically as on-chain conditions change. Incident detection triggers immediate score adjustments.
Full Transparency
Every vector weight, scoring threshold, and tier boundary is publicly documented. Challenge the model, not the output.
Conservative Defaults
Missing data receives the worst-case assumption. An unaudited protocol scores zero on audit density, not 'pending review'.
Start Your Research
Filter by risk tier, chain, protocol, and asset type. Compare risk-adjusted returns across 600+ vaults.