I agree. I will fix that and rephrase it a bit to make it more understandable. Thank you for the suggestion.

The article refers to “Any Type of C# Logic”, and not about “Pure C# Logic”. I have no doubt that you know very well about Razor Syntax and Partial Classes. But the wording “… if you have any type of C# logic in your component, the @code block must exist” is probably not entirely accurate.

Ok, thank you. Just, I don’t think we should count that as a pure C# logic since you shouldn’t implement real business logic there, and that’s what we meant with the mentioned sentence. As I said, I find that more of a markup code.

Yes, i mean the Razor syntax, since it contains C# logic but does not require @code block.

Could you elaborate please? And I hope you don’t think about @razor syntax which is more of a markup then q c# code. Or Partial classes because that is a completely different thing, which we cover in the next article of the series.