http://www.writing.com/main/view_item/item_id/1730925-Atomic-Angels-Introduction

http://www.facebook.com/jed.justice?sk=wall

It doesn’t look like you’re still blogging but I would really like to talk to you or anyone really. I’m willing to admit to God and the world that I viewed CP but the fact that the rest of my life will be spent being seen as a malicious child abuser is really painful. Your blog has helped.

I watched CP because of my struggles resulting from nonconsensual abuse as a child. My reasons for viewing were many the least of them being sexual. Because of CPs illegal status it looks as if I may spend many of my young adult years in prison.

I have seen first hand the hysteria surrounding CP and a total unwillingness for people, especially law enforcement and the legal system to consider anyones reasons for viewing CP besides being psychopathic child rapists. Idk if I agree with you that CP should be decriminalized but I whole heartfelt agree that we, as a society, MUST take a different approach to our views on CP and child sexuality. If we don’t, we will just continue to harm youth, members of the MAA community, and people somewhere in the middle, like me.

Thanks so much!

I happen to think it is high time that the exact same tyranny and oppression referred to so eloquently by Robert A Heinlein back in 1940, be challenged some seventy years on. The full quote has appeared in this blog before, but is worth repeating again: “Whenever any government, or any church, or anyone else for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects: ‘This book you may not read, this film you may not watch, this image you may not see, this knowledge you may not have,’ then the end result is tyranny and oppression, no matter how holy the motives.”

I happen to think that the juggernaught that is the paradigm of paedosexual persecution can be rendered inert, rather like the virus released by Merlin into Madam Mim, causing her to cough uncontrollably in the wizard’s duel in Disney’s Sword and the Stone. Like a virus, the action of individuals determined enough to take a stand, will be key. One such action is this courageous blog that asks a whole host of searching questions about the conduct of the tyranny and highlights the inhumanity of the oppression. Another is the Newgon website that: “document facts, opinions, arguments, research and testimonies relating to physical attractions and relationships between minors and adults – we strive to expose the positive side of these often condemned facts of life.” Yet another is B4U-Act: “a unique collaborative effort between minor-attracted people and mental health professionals to promote communication and understanding between the two groups. Our goal is unique and unprecedented: to make effective and compassionate mental health care available to individuals who self-identify as minor-attracted and who are seeking assistance in dealing with issues in their lives that are challenging to them. We want to give them hope for productive and fulfilling lives, rather than waiting for a crisis to occur.” For my part, I am in the process of taking the UK Government to the European Court of Human Rights, in connection with its breach of Article 14: the prohibition of discrimination (of my sexual orientation).

The paradigm mentioned above is well overdue a shifting, and relentlessly raising the profile of the truth in topics such as the reality of child porn, the validity of paedosexuality, the agenda of lawmaker, the agenda of enforcement agency, the arts and societal hypocrisy, the responsibility a child has for his or her own actions hypocrisy, mental health care agencies prejudice, etc., will all help begin this shift.

As I’m sure you know, internet child modelling is often described a CP. I feel I know the business pretty well, and I’m in touch with ex-models and photographers, etc. So far I’ve yet to come across a single case where a child has felt victimised or where a parent has complained. In every case, it is the authorities who have made the ‘victims’ and deceived the public – on a massive scale.

We have the unholy alliance of US Christian-right ‘morals’ and victim-feminism to thank for the damage this witch-hunt has done to so many families, children and society itself. It is creating a psychopathic society – deluded, paranoid, hysterical and lacking in empathy. It is primarily a disease of the sexually-repressed and sex-obsessed Anglophone world, and originated in that so-called land of freedom: the USA.

I’m sure I could provide you with much useful material. Please contact me if interested.

Secondly, to state that because “no money changes hands”, the viewing of child porn has no effect on its production is, in my experience, not the case. Although I never made a single frame of CP, it was plain from the online trading going on that production of new material is highly sought after. Much of the material I saw over the years was heavily recycled and traders would ask specifically for CP they had not seen before they would release what they had already. In one system, “buyers” would gain numerical credits by uploading their own material which, if the “seller” wanted it, would allow them to “buy” part of the seller’s collection. That is a clear incentive to make new CP: make a new film or set of photographs in order to get someone else’s collection. I have no objection to it if the participants are happy, but there definitely is an ongoing trade between viewers and producers.

Can anyone address these arguments?