Comments for The Geodesic Edge https://geodesicanalytics.wordpress.com A quantitative finance blog. Tue, 29 May 2018 03:10:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ Comment on Evaluating Trading Strategies with Random Portfolios by Jay Young https://geodesicanalytics.wordpress.com/2017/05/27/evaluating-trading-strategies-against-random-portfolios/comment-page-1/#comment-24 Tue, 29 May 2018 03:10:34 +0000 http://geodesicanalytics.wordpress.com/?p=122#comment-24 In reply to steve98654.

I never realized that their risk parameters were so strict.
My goal, for my own trading, is to keeping drawdowns low compared to buy and hold, by exiting below certain monthly moving averages or after certain weekly “death crosses” occur. Not a panacea, but better than the gut wrenching drawdowns with buy and hold.

Ever read the work of Campbell Harvey on evaluating trading strategies? Like yourself, he warns about how easy it is to gets fooled by random chance when evaluating strategies. Here’s one link: https://faculty.fuqua.duke.edu/~charvey/Research/Published_Papers/P116_Evaluating_trading_strategies.pdf

Like

]]>
Comment on Evaluating Trading Strategies with Random Portfolios by steve98654 https://geodesicanalytics.wordpress.com/2017/05/27/evaluating-trading-strategies-against-random-portfolios/comment-page-1/#comment-23 Tue, 29 May 2018 00:42:11 +0000 http://geodesicanalytics.wordpress.com/?p=122#comment-23 In reply to Jay Young.

This is a common drawdown limit buyside firms place on their portfolio managers. You will surely get a call from risk with a 5% drawdown and in the worst case get shut down.

Like

]]>
Comment on Evaluating Trading Strategies with Random Portfolios by Jay Young https://geodesicanalytics.wordpress.com/2017/05/27/evaluating-trading-strategies-against-random-portfolios/comment-page-1/#comment-22 Mon, 28 May 2018 22:20:38 +0000 http://geodesicanalytics.wordpress.com/?p=122#comment-22 Hard to believe a trading strategy would be shut down due to only incurring a max drawdown of 5%.

Like

]]>
Comment on Improving Your Sharpe Ratio by Adding Additional Strategies by steve98654 https://geodesicanalytics.wordpress.com/2017/09/02/improving-your-sharpe-ratio-by-adding-additional-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-10 Mon, 04 Sep 2017 05:09:20 +0000 http://geodesicanalytics.wordpress.com/?p=165#comment-10 In reply to Thibaut Van Weehaeghe.

Hi Thibault,

I agree with the numerator in your comment but am finding a different denominator. Specifically, in your notation the variance (no sqrt) is given by:

s_1^2w_1^2 + s_2^2w_2^2 + s_3^2 w_3^2 + 2 r_{12}s_1s_2w_1w_2 + 2 r_{13}s_1s_3w_1w_3  + 2 r_{23}s_2s_3w_2w_3

Hope this helps!

Like

]]>
Comment on Improving Your Sharpe Ratio by Adding Additional Strategies by Thibaut Van Weehaeghe https://geodesicanalytics.wordpress.com/2017/09/02/improving-your-sharpe-ratio-by-adding-additional-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-9 Sun, 03 Sep 2017 12:28:32 +0000 http://geodesicanalytics.wordpress.com/?p=165#comment-9 Hi,

Thanks for the article! Is the correct formula for 3 assets the following:

w1mu1+w2mu2+w3mu3 / sqrt( w1^2 * s1^2 + w2^2 * s2^2 + w3^2 * s3 ^2 + 2 * w1w2w3 * s1s2s3 * r12 * r23 * r13)

thanks

Like

]]>
Comment on Improving Your Sharpe Ratio by Adding Additional Strategies by Quantocracy's Daily Wrap for 09/02/2017 | Quantocracy https://geodesicanalytics.wordpress.com/2017/09/02/improving-your-sharpe-ratio-by-adding-additional-strategies/comment-page-1/#comment-8 Sun, 03 Sep 2017 05:16:09 +0000 http://geodesicanalytics.wordpress.com/?p=165#comment-8 […] Improving Your Sharpe Ratio by Adding Additional Strategies [Geodesic Edge] […]

Like

]]>
Comment on Evaluating Trading Strategies with Random Portfolios by MACD expert advisor https://geodesicanalytics.wordpress.com/2017/05/27/evaluating-trading-strategies-against-random-portfolios/comment-page-1/#comment-7 Sun, 23 Jul 2017 05:41:08 +0000 http://geodesicanalytics.wordpress.com/?p=122#comment-7 I gotta favorite this web site it seems very beneficial very beneficial

Like

]]>
Comment on Evaluating Trading Strategies with Random Portfolios by What we are reading on 5/30/2017 - UNDERVALUED STOCKS https://geodesicanalytics.wordpress.com/2017/05/27/evaluating-trading-strategies-against-random-portfolios/comment-page-1/#comment-4 Tue, 30 May 2017 12:43:02 +0000 http://geodesicanalytics.wordpress.com/?p=122#comment-4 […] advice therein. In no particular order: Rebalancing, investment process and portfolio construction The use of monte carlo simulations in performance evaluations Does momentum reverse over the long term? Is low volatility a problem? Inside the world of investor […]

Like

]]>
Comment on Evaluating Trading Strategies with Random Portfolios by Quantocracy's Daily Wrap for 05/28/2017 | Quantocracy https://geodesicanalytics.wordpress.com/2017/05/27/evaluating-trading-strategies-against-random-portfolios/comment-page-1/#comment-3 Mon, 29 May 2017 05:15:26 +0000 http://geodesicanalytics.wordpress.com/?p=122#comment-3 […] Evaluating Trading Strategies with Random Portfolios [Geodesic Edge] […]

Like

]]>