Skip to content

Low cardinality in native http#6891

Merged
alexey-milovidov merged 8 commits intomasterfrom
low_cardinality_in_native_http
Sep 13, 2019
Merged

Low cardinality in native http#6891
alexey-milovidov merged 8 commits intomasterfrom
low_cardinality_in_native_http

Conversation

@KochetovNicolai
Copy link
Member

@KochetovNicolai KochetovNicolai commented Sep 10, 2019

I hereby agree to the terms of the CLA available at: https://yandex.ru/legal/cla/?lang=en

For changelog. Remove if this is non-significant change.

Category (leave one):

  • Improvement

Short description (up to few sentences):
Automatically convert columns to LowCardinality when needed using Native format in http. Use header in NativeBlockInputStream created from InterpreterSelectQuery and fill skipped columns with default values.

[CLICKHOUSE-4642]

@KochetovNicolai KochetovNicolai added the pr-improvement Pull request with some product improvements label Sep 10, 2019
@KochetovNicolai KochetovNicolai marked this pull request as ready for review September 11, 2019 14:31
Copy link
Member

@alexey-milovidov alexey-milovidov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can add a test: sh test where Native format is generated by clickhouse-local and sent to clickhouse-server via HTTP interface.

@alexey-milovidov alexey-milovidov merged commit 12c26e6 into master Sep 13, 2019
azat added a commit to azat/ClickHouse that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2019
Previous patch e527def ("Fix INSERT
into Distributed() table with MATERIALIZED column") fixes it only for
cases when the node is local, i.e. direct insert.

This patch address the problem when the node is not local
(`is_local == false`), by erasing materialized columns on INSERT into
Distributed.

And this patch fixes two cases, depends on `insert_distributed_sync`
setting:

- `insert_distributed_sync=0`

    ```
    Not found column value in block. There are only columns: date. Stack trace:

    2. 0x7ffff7be92e0 DB::Exception::Exception() dbms/src/Common/Exception.h:27
    3. 0x7fffec5d6cf6 DB::Block::getByName(...) dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:187
    4. 0x7fffec2fe067 DB::NativeBlockInputStream::readImpl() dbms/src/DataStreams/NativeBlockInputStream.cpp:159
    5. 0x7fffec2d223f DB::IBlockInputStream::read() dbms/src/DataStreams/IBlockInputStream.cpp:61
    6. 0x7ffff7c6d40d DB::TCPHandler::receiveData() dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:971
    7. 0x7ffff7c6cc1d DB::TCPHandler::receivePacket() dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:855
    8. 0x7ffff7c6a1ef DB::TCPHandler::readDataNext(unsigned long const&, int const&) dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:406
    9. 0x7ffff7c6a41b DB::TCPHandler::readData(DB::Settings const&) dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:437
    10. 0x7ffff7c6a5d9 DB::TCPHandler::processInsertQuery(DB::Settings const&) dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:464
    11. 0x7ffff7c687b5 DB::TCPHandler::runImpl() dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:257
    ```

- `insert_distributed_sync=1`

    ```
    2019.10.18 13:23:22.114578 [ 44 ] {a78f669f-0b08-4337-abf8-d31e958f6d12} <Error> executeQuery: Code: 171, e.displayText() = DB::Exception: Block structure mismatch in RemoteBlockOutputStream stream: different number of columns:
    date Date UInt16(size = 1), value Date UInt16(size = 1)
    date Date UInt16(size = 0): Insertion status:
    Wrote 1 blocks and 0 rows on shard 0 replica 0, 127.0.0.1:59000 (average 0 ms per block)
    Wrote 0 blocks and 0 rows on shard 1 replica 0, 127.0.0.2:59000 (average 2 ms per block)
     (version 19.16.1.1) (from [::1]:3624) (in query: INSERT INTO distributed_00952 VALUES ), Stack trace:

    2. 0x7ffff7be92e0 DB::Exception::Exception() dbms/src/Common/Exception.h:27
    3. 0x7fffec5da4e9 DB::checkBlockStructure<void>(...)::{...}::operator()(...) const dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:460
    4. 0x7fffec5da671 void DB::checkBlockStructure<void>(...) dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:467
    5. 0x7fffec5d8d58 DB::assertBlocksHaveEqualStructure(...) dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:515
    6. 0x7fffec326630 DB::RemoteBlockOutputStream::write(DB::Block const&) dbms/src/DataStreams/RemoteBlockOutputStream.cpp:68
    7. 0x7fffe98bd154 DB::DistributedBlockOutputStream::runWritingJob(DB::DistributedBlockOutputStream::JobReplica&, DB::Block const&)::{lambda()ClickHouse#1}::operator()() const dbms/src/Storages/Distributed/DistributedBlockOutputStream.cpp:280
    <snip>
    ````

Fixes: ClickHouse#7365
Fixes: ClickHouse#5429
Refs: ClickHouse#6891
akuzm added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2019
* Fix INSERT into Distributed non local node with MATERIALIZED columns

Previous patch e527def ("Fix INSERT
into Distributed() table with MATERIALIZED column") fixes it only for
cases when the node is local, i.e. direct insert.

This patch address the problem when the node is not local
(`is_local == false`), by erasing materialized columns on INSERT into
Distributed.

And this patch fixes two cases, depends on `insert_distributed_sync`
setting:

- `insert_distributed_sync=0`

    ```
    Not found column value in block. There are only columns: date. Stack trace:

    2. 0x7ffff7be92e0 DB::Exception::Exception() dbms/src/Common/Exception.h:27
    3. 0x7fffec5d6cf6 DB::Block::getByName(...) dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:187
    4. 0x7fffec2fe067 DB::NativeBlockInputStream::readImpl() dbms/src/DataStreams/NativeBlockInputStream.cpp:159
    5. 0x7fffec2d223f DB::IBlockInputStream::read() dbms/src/DataStreams/IBlockInputStream.cpp:61
    6. 0x7ffff7c6d40d DB::TCPHandler::receiveData() dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:971
    7. 0x7ffff7c6cc1d DB::TCPHandler::receivePacket() dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:855
    8. 0x7ffff7c6a1ef DB::TCPHandler::readDataNext(unsigned long const&, int const&) dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:406
    9. 0x7ffff7c6a41b DB::TCPHandler::readData(DB::Settings const&) dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:437
    10. 0x7ffff7c6a5d9 DB::TCPHandler::processInsertQuery(DB::Settings const&) dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:464
    11. 0x7ffff7c687b5 DB::TCPHandler::runImpl() dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:257
    ```

- `insert_distributed_sync=1`

    ```
    2019.10.18 13:23:22.114578 [ 44 ] {a78f669f-0b08-4337-abf8-d31e958f6d12} <Error> executeQuery: Code: 171, e.displayText() = DB::Exception: Block structure mismatch in RemoteBlockOutputStream stream: different number of columns:
    date Date UInt16(size = 1), value Date UInt16(size = 1)
    date Date UInt16(size = 0): Insertion status:
    Wrote 1 blocks and 0 rows on shard 0 replica 0, 127.0.0.1:59000 (average 0 ms per block)
    Wrote 0 blocks and 0 rows on shard 1 replica 0, 127.0.0.2:59000 (average 2 ms per block)
     (version 19.16.1.1) (from [::1]:3624) (in query: INSERT INTO distributed_00952 VALUES ), Stack trace:

    2. 0x7ffff7be92e0 DB::Exception::Exception() dbms/src/Common/Exception.h:27
    3. 0x7fffec5da4e9 DB::checkBlockStructure<void>(...)::{...}::operator()(...) const dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:460
    4. 0x7fffec5da671 void DB::checkBlockStructure<void>(...) dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:467
    5. 0x7fffec5d8d58 DB::assertBlocksHaveEqualStructure(...) dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:515
    6. 0x7fffec326630 DB::RemoteBlockOutputStream::write(DB::Block const&) dbms/src/DataStreams/RemoteBlockOutputStream.cpp:68
    7. 0x7fffe98bd154 DB::DistributedBlockOutputStream::runWritingJob(DB::DistributedBlockOutputStream::JobReplica&, DB::Block const&)::{lambda()#1}::operator()() const dbms/src/Storages/Distributed/DistributedBlockOutputStream.cpp:280
    <snip>
    ````

Fixes: #7365
Fixes: #5429
Refs: #6891

* Cover INSERT into Distributed with MATERIALIZED columns and !is_local node

I guess that adding new cluster into server-test.xml is not required,
but it won't harm.

* Update DistributedBlockOutputStream.cpp
akuzm added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2019
* Fix INSERT into Distributed non local node with MATERIALIZED columns

Previous patch e527def ("Fix INSERT
into Distributed() table with MATERIALIZED column") fixes it only for
cases when the node is local, i.e. direct insert.

This patch address the problem when the node is not local
(`is_local == false`), by erasing materialized columns on INSERT into
Distributed.

And this patch fixes two cases, depends on `insert_distributed_sync`
setting:

- `insert_distributed_sync=0`

    ```
    Not found column value in block. There are only columns: date. Stack trace:

    2. 0x7ffff7be92e0 DB::Exception::Exception() dbms/src/Common/Exception.h:27
    3. 0x7fffec5d6cf6 DB::Block::getByName(...) dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:187
    4. 0x7fffec2fe067 DB::NativeBlockInputStream::readImpl() dbms/src/DataStreams/NativeBlockInputStream.cpp:159
    5. 0x7fffec2d223f DB::IBlockInputStream::read() dbms/src/DataStreams/IBlockInputStream.cpp:61
    6. 0x7ffff7c6d40d DB::TCPHandler::receiveData() dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:971
    7. 0x7ffff7c6cc1d DB::TCPHandler::receivePacket() dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:855
    8. 0x7ffff7c6a1ef DB::TCPHandler::readDataNext(unsigned long const&, int const&) dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:406
    9. 0x7ffff7c6a41b DB::TCPHandler::readData(DB::Settings const&) dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:437
    10. 0x7ffff7c6a5d9 DB::TCPHandler::processInsertQuery(DB::Settings const&) dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:464
    11. 0x7ffff7c687b5 DB::TCPHandler::runImpl() dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:257
    ```

- `insert_distributed_sync=1`

    ```
    2019.10.18 13:23:22.114578 [ 44 ] {a78f669f-0b08-4337-abf8-d31e958f6d12} <Error> executeQuery: Code: 171, e.displayText() = DB::Exception: Block structure mismatch in RemoteBlockOutputStream stream: different number of columns:
    date Date UInt16(size = 1), value Date UInt16(size = 1)
    date Date UInt16(size = 0): Insertion status:
    Wrote 1 blocks and 0 rows on shard 0 replica 0, 127.0.0.1:59000 (average 0 ms per block)
    Wrote 0 blocks and 0 rows on shard 1 replica 0, 127.0.0.2:59000 (average 2 ms per block)
     (version 19.16.1.1) (from [::1]:3624) (in query: INSERT INTO distributed_00952 VALUES ), Stack trace:

    2. 0x7ffff7be92e0 DB::Exception::Exception() dbms/src/Common/Exception.h:27
    3. 0x7fffec5da4e9 DB::checkBlockStructure<void>(...)::{...}::operator()(...) const dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:460
    4. 0x7fffec5da671 void DB::checkBlockStructure<void>(...) dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:467
    5. 0x7fffec5d8d58 DB::assertBlocksHaveEqualStructure(...) dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:515
    6. 0x7fffec326630 DB::RemoteBlockOutputStream::write(DB::Block const&) dbms/src/DataStreams/RemoteBlockOutputStream.cpp:68
    7. 0x7fffe98bd154 DB::DistributedBlockOutputStream::runWritingJob(DB::DistributedBlockOutputStream::JobReplica&, DB::Block const&)::{lambda()#1}::operator()() const dbms/src/Storages/Distributed/DistributedBlockOutputStream.cpp:280
    <snip>
    ````

Fixes: #7365
Fixes: #5429
Refs: #6891

* Cover INSERT into Distributed with MATERIALIZED columns and !is_local node

I guess that adding new cluster into server-test.xml is not required,
but it won't harm.

* Update DistributedBlockOutputStream.cpp

(cherry picked from commit 29052b6)
akuzm added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2019
* Fix INSERT into Distributed non local node with MATERIALIZED columns

Previous patch e527def ("Fix INSERT
into Distributed() table with MATERIALIZED column") fixes it only for
cases when the node is local, i.e. direct insert.

This patch address the problem when the node is not local
(`is_local == false`), by erasing materialized columns on INSERT into
Distributed.

And this patch fixes two cases, depends on `insert_distributed_sync`
setting:

- `insert_distributed_sync=0`

    ```
    Not found column value in block. There are only columns: date. Stack trace:

    2. 0x7ffff7be92e0 DB::Exception::Exception() dbms/src/Common/Exception.h:27
    3. 0x7fffec5d6cf6 DB::Block::getByName(...) dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:187
    4. 0x7fffec2fe067 DB::NativeBlockInputStream::readImpl() dbms/src/DataStreams/NativeBlockInputStream.cpp:159
    5. 0x7fffec2d223f DB::IBlockInputStream::read() dbms/src/DataStreams/IBlockInputStream.cpp:61
    6. 0x7ffff7c6d40d DB::TCPHandler::receiveData() dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:971
    7. 0x7ffff7c6cc1d DB::TCPHandler::receivePacket() dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:855
    8. 0x7ffff7c6a1ef DB::TCPHandler::readDataNext(unsigned long const&, int const&) dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:406
    9. 0x7ffff7c6a41b DB::TCPHandler::readData(DB::Settings const&) dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:437
    10. 0x7ffff7c6a5d9 DB::TCPHandler::processInsertQuery(DB::Settings const&) dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:464
    11. 0x7ffff7c687b5 DB::TCPHandler::runImpl() dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:257
    ```

- `insert_distributed_sync=1`

    ```
    2019.10.18 13:23:22.114578 [ 44 ] {a78f669f-0b08-4337-abf8-d31e958f6d12} <Error> executeQuery: Code: 171, e.displayText() = DB::Exception: Block structure mismatch in RemoteBlockOutputStream stream: different number of columns:
    date Date UInt16(size = 1), value Date UInt16(size = 1)
    date Date UInt16(size = 0): Insertion status:
    Wrote 1 blocks and 0 rows on shard 0 replica 0, 127.0.0.1:59000 (average 0 ms per block)
    Wrote 0 blocks and 0 rows on shard 1 replica 0, 127.0.0.2:59000 (average 2 ms per block)
     (version 19.16.1.1) (from [::1]:3624) (in query: INSERT INTO distributed_00952 VALUES ), Stack trace:

    2. 0x7ffff7be92e0 DB::Exception::Exception() dbms/src/Common/Exception.h:27
    3. 0x7fffec5da4e9 DB::checkBlockStructure<void>(...)::{...}::operator()(...) const dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:460
    4. 0x7fffec5da671 void DB::checkBlockStructure<void>(...) dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:467
    5. 0x7fffec5d8d58 DB::assertBlocksHaveEqualStructure(...) dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:515
    6. 0x7fffec326630 DB::RemoteBlockOutputStream::write(DB::Block const&) dbms/src/DataStreams/RemoteBlockOutputStream.cpp:68
    7. 0x7fffe98bd154 DB::DistributedBlockOutputStream::runWritingJob(DB::DistributedBlockOutputStream::JobReplica&, DB::Block const&)::{lambda()#1}::operator()() const dbms/src/Storages/Distributed/DistributedBlockOutputStream.cpp:280
    <snip>
    ````

Fixes: #7365
Fixes: #5429
Refs: #6891

* Cover INSERT into Distributed with MATERIALIZED columns and !is_local node

I guess that adding new cluster into server-test.xml is not required,
but it won't harm.

* Update DistributedBlockOutputStream.cpp

(cherry picked from commit 29052b6)
CurtizJ pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2019
* Fix INSERT into Distributed non local node with MATERIALIZED columns

Previous patch e527def ("Fix INSERT
into Distributed() table with MATERIALIZED column") fixes it only for
cases when the node is local, i.e. direct insert.

This patch address the problem when the node is not local
(`is_local == false`), by erasing materialized columns on INSERT into
Distributed.

And this patch fixes two cases, depends on `insert_distributed_sync`
setting:

- `insert_distributed_sync=0`

    ```
    Not found column value in block. There are only columns: date. Stack trace:

    2. 0x7ffff7be92e0 DB::Exception::Exception() dbms/src/Common/Exception.h:27
    3. 0x7fffec5d6cf6 DB::Block::getByName(...) dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:187
    4. 0x7fffec2fe067 DB::NativeBlockInputStream::readImpl() dbms/src/DataStreams/NativeBlockInputStream.cpp:159
    5. 0x7fffec2d223f DB::IBlockInputStream::read() dbms/src/DataStreams/IBlockInputStream.cpp:61
    6. 0x7ffff7c6d40d DB::TCPHandler::receiveData() dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:971
    7. 0x7ffff7c6cc1d DB::TCPHandler::receivePacket() dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:855
    8. 0x7ffff7c6a1ef DB::TCPHandler::readDataNext(unsigned long const&, int const&) dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:406
    9. 0x7ffff7c6a41b DB::TCPHandler::readData(DB::Settings const&) dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:437
    10. 0x7ffff7c6a5d9 DB::TCPHandler::processInsertQuery(DB::Settings const&) dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:464
    11. 0x7ffff7c687b5 DB::TCPHandler::runImpl() dbms/programs/server/TCPHandler.cpp:257
    ```

- `insert_distributed_sync=1`

    ```
    2019.10.18 13:23:22.114578 [ 44 ] {a78f669f-0b08-4337-abf8-d31e958f6d12} <Error> executeQuery: Code: 171, e.displayText() = DB::Exception: Block structure mismatch in RemoteBlockOutputStream stream: different number of columns:
    date Date UInt16(size = 1), value Date UInt16(size = 1)
    date Date UInt16(size = 0): Insertion status:
    Wrote 1 blocks and 0 rows on shard 0 replica 0, 127.0.0.1:59000 (average 0 ms per block)
    Wrote 0 blocks and 0 rows on shard 1 replica 0, 127.0.0.2:59000 (average 2 ms per block)
     (version 19.16.1.1) (from [::1]:3624) (in query: INSERT INTO distributed_00952 VALUES ), Stack trace:

    2. 0x7ffff7be92e0 DB::Exception::Exception() dbms/src/Common/Exception.h:27
    3. 0x7fffec5da4e9 DB::checkBlockStructure<void>(...)::{...}::operator()(...) const dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:460
    4. 0x7fffec5da671 void DB::checkBlockStructure<void>(...) dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:467
    5. 0x7fffec5d8d58 DB::assertBlocksHaveEqualStructure(...) dbms/src/Core/Block.cpp:515
    6. 0x7fffec326630 DB::RemoteBlockOutputStream::write(DB::Block const&) dbms/src/DataStreams/RemoteBlockOutputStream.cpp:68
    7. 0x7fffe98bd154 DB::DistributedBlockOutputStream::runWritingJob(DB::DistributedBlockOutputStream::JobReplica&, DB::Block const&)::{lambda()#1}::operator()() const dbms/src/Storages/Distributed/DistributedBlockOutputStream.cpp:280
    <snip>
    ````

Fixes: #7365
Fixes: #5429
Refs: #6891

* Cover INSERT into Distributed with MATERIALIZED columns and !is_local node

I guess that adding new cluster into server-test.xml is not required,
but it won't harm.

* Update DistributedBlockOutputStream.cpp

(cherry picked from commit 29052b6)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

pr-improvement Pull request with some product improvements

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants