Skip to content

Cherry pick #87303 to 25.9: Fix condition not being moved to PREWHERE in case there is a row policy (version 2)#88200

Merged
rienath merged 24 commits intobackport/25.9/87303from
cherrypick/25.9/87303
Oct 8, 2025
Merged

Cherry pick #87303 to 25.9: Fix condition not being moved to PREWHERE in case there is a row policy (version 2)#88200
rienath merged 24 commits intobackport/25.9/87303from
cherrypick/25.9/87303

Conversation

@robot-ch-test-poll1
Copy link
Contributor

Original pull-request #87303

Do not merge this PR manually

This pull-request is a first step of an automated backporting.
It contains changes similar to calling git cherry-pick locally.
If you intend to continue backporting the changes, then resolve all conflicts if any.
Otherwise, if you do not want to backport them, then just close this pull-request.

The check results does not matter at this step - you can safely ignore them.

Troubleshooting

If the conflicts were resolved in a wrong way

If this cherry-pick PR is completely screwed by a wrong conflicts resolution, and you want to recreate it:

  • delete the pr-cherrypick label from the PR
  • delete this branch from the repository

You also need to check the Original pull-request for pr-backports-created label, and delete if it's presented there

The PR source

The PR is created in the CI job

@robot-ch-test-poll1 robot-ch-test-poll1 added pr-cherrypick Cherry-pick of merge-commit before backporting. Do not use manually - automated use only! do not test disable testing on pull request pr-bugfix Pull request with bugfix, not backported by default labels Oct 7, 2025
@rienath rienath self-assigned this Oct 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do not test disable testing on pull request pr-bugfix Pull request with bugfix, not backported by default pr-cherrypick Cherry-pick of merge-commit before backporting. Do not use manually - automated use only!

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants