Skip to content

Better access validation for TableFunctionLoop#88802

Merged
pufit merged 5 commits intomasterfrom
pufit/fix-table-function-access
Oct 22, 2025
Merged

Better access validation for TableFunctionLoop#88802
pufit merged 5 commits intomasterfrom
pufit/fix-table-function-access

Conversation

@pufit
Copy link
Member

@pufit pufit commented Oct 19, 2025

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Critical Bug Fix (crash, data loss, RBAC) or LOGICAL_ERROR

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes into CHANGELOG.md):

Fixes access validation on select for loop table function.

@clickhouse-gh
Copy link
Contributor

clickhouse-gh bot commented Oct 19, 2025

Workflow [PR], commit [285e99f]

Summary:

job_name test_name status info comment
Stateless tests (amd_binary, old analyzer, s3 storage, DatabaseReplicated, parallel) failure
01287_max_execution_speed FAIL cidb, flaky
Integration tests (amd_asan, old analyzer, 5/6) failure
test_zookeeper_config/test_secure.py::test_secure_connection FAIL cidb

@clickhouse-gh clickhouse-gh bot added pr-critical-bugfix pr-must-backport Pull request should be backported intentionally. Use this label with great care! pr-must-backport-cloud labels Oct 19, 2025
@evillique evillique self-assigned this Oct 19, 2025
@pufit pufit added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 22, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit ae414ae Oct 22, 2025
120 of 123 checks passed
@pufit pufit deleted the pufit/fix-table-function-access branch October 22, 2025 11:46
@robot-ch-test-poll3 robot-ch-test-poll3 added the pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo label Oct 22, 2025
robot-clickhouse-ci-1 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2025
Cherry pick #88802 to 25.3: Better access validation for `TableFunctionLoop`
robot-clickhouse-ci-1 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2025
Cherry pick #88802 to 25.7: Better access validation for `TableFunctionLoop`
robot-clickhouse-ci-1 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2025
Cherry pick #88802 to 25.8: Better access validation for `TableFunctionLoop`
robot-clickhouse-ci-1 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2025
Cherry pick #88802 to 25.9: Better access validation for `TableFunctionLoop`
clickhouse-gh bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2025
Backport #88802 to 25.7: Better access validation for `TableFunctionLoop`
@robot-ch-test-poll2 robot-ch-test-poll2 added pr-backports-created-cloud deprecated label, NOOP pr-must-backport-synced The `*-must-backport` labels are synced into the cloud Sync PR pr-backports-created Backport PRs are successfully created, it won't be processed by CI script anymore labels Oct 22, 2025
pufit added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2025
Backport #88802 to 25.9: Better access validation for `TableFunctionLoop`
pufit added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2025
Backport #88802 to 25.8: Better access validation for `TableFunctionLoop`
pufit added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2025
Backport #88802 to 25.3: Better access validation for `TableFunctionLoop`
mkmkme pushed a commit to Altinity/ClickHouse that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2025
…unction-access

Better access validation for `TableFunctionLoop`
zvonand added a commit to Altinity/ClickHouse that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2025
24.8.14 Backport of ClickHouse#88802 - Better access validation for `TableFunctionLoop`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

pr-backports-created Backport PRs are successfully created, it won't be processed by CI script anymore pr-backports-created-cloud deprecated label, NOOP pr-critical-bugfix pr-must-backport Pull request should be backported intentionally. Use this label with great care! pr-must-backport-synced The `*-must-backport` labels are synced into the cloud Sync PR pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants