Skip to content

StructuresComp/agri-chrono

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

Β 

History

85 Commits
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 
Β 

Repository files navigation

AgriChrono: A Multi-modal Dataset Capturing Crop Growth and Lighting Variability with a Field Robot

Jaehwan Jeong1,2, Tuan-Anh Vu2, Mohammad Jony3, Shahab Ahmad3,
Md. Mukhlesur Rahman3, Sangpil Kim1,†, and M. Khalid Jawed2,†

1Korea University, Β  2University of California, Los Angeles, Β  3North Dakota State University

1. Project Overview

  • Duration: July 2 – August 1, 2025
  • Location: NDSU Experimental Field, Fargo, ND
  • Objective: Capture time-aligned RGB-D, LiDAR, IMU, and Pose data across three crop sites under realistic outdoor conditions
  • Focus Sites:
    • Site 1: Primary canola site, with repeated daily captures across growth stages and lighting variations
    • Site 2: Canola genotype trial with 44 varieties for morphological diversity
    • Site 3: Flax trial site with structural variability from differing weed control strategies
Overview Image

2. System Resources

πŸ”§ Hardware Documentation
Robot platform, sensor layout, power system, and networking design for long-term deployment

πŸ’» Software Stack
Control interfaces, real-time streaming modules, and logging mechanisms used during collection

πŸ“Š NVS Benchmark
Novel View Synthesis benchmark on AgriChrono across seven scenarios featuring lighting variance and growth span.

πŸ’Ύ AgriChrono Dataset
Public release of RGB-D, LiDAR, IMU, and Pose recordings collected in real-world conditions

System Diagram

3. Field Layout

Experimental Field

Main Field Structure

  • Site 1: Regular Canola (main target crop)
  • Site 2: Canola Genotype Trial
  • Site 3: Flax Trial

4. Data Collection Protocol

πŸ“† Collection Phases

Phase Dates Frequency Purpose
Phase 1 July 2–21 4Γ— daily, 7 days/week Active growth tracking & lighting variation
Phase 2 July 22–Aug 1 2 sessions/week Slowed growth; less sampling

πŸ§ͺ Site-wise Collection Frequency

Site Description Sessions/Day Days/Week Period
Site 1 Main Canola Site 4 7 July 2–21
4 2 July 22–Aug 1
Site 2 Canola Genotype Trial (Side) 1 1–2 (selected) July 2–Aug 1
Site 3 Flax Trial (Side) 1 1–2 (selected) July 2–Aug 1

πŸ›  Field Conditions

  • ❌ Rainy days: skipped
  • βœ… Wet soil: wooden boards used for UGV traversal
  • β˜€οΈ Lighting Diversity:
    • 06:00 (sunrise)
    • 11:00 (late morning)
    • 16:00 (afternoon)
    • 21:00 (sunset)
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
7/1 2 3 4 5
S1 (4)
S2 (1)
S3 (1)
S1 (3)
S3 (1)
S1 (3) S1 (2)
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
S1 (4) S1 (4) S1 (4) S1 (4) S1 (3)
S2 (1)
S3 (1)
S1 (4) S1 (4)
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
S1 (4)
S2 (1)
S3 (1)
S1 (4) S1 (4) S1 (4) S1 (4)
S2 (1)
S3 (1)
S1 (4) S1 (4)
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
S1 (4) S1 (2)
S2 (1)
S3 (1)
S1 (1) S1 (1)
27 28 29 30 31 8/1
S1 (1)
S2 (1)
S3 (1)
S1 (1) S1 (1) S1 (1) S1 (1)
S2 (1)
S3 (1)

5. Site Descriptions

🌼 Site 1: Main Canola Site

  • Dimensions: 50 ft Γ— 3 ft, 4 rows per plot, 9-inch spacing
  • Planting: June 1, 2025 β†’ Emergence June 7
  • Variety: InVigor L340PC
  • Flowering: July 10, 2025
  • Crop Duration: 90–110 days
  • Objective: Provide a consistent reference for tracking temporal appearance changes of a single canola variety across growth stages and lighting conditions.

🌼 Site 2: Canola Genotype Trial Site

  • Design: 11 blocks Γ— 44 genotypes
  • Size: 44 ft Γ— 3 ft each
  • Planting: May 30, 2025
  • Objective: Capture morphological and structural variation by recording diverse genotypes planted in multiple distributed plots.

🌿 Site 3: Flax Trial Site

  • Design: 4 Γ— 4 plots = 16 plots
  • Size: 8 ft Γ— 3 ft each
  • Planting: May 30, 2025
  • Variety: Gold ND
  • Duration: 90–120 days
  • Weed Control:
    • 3 blocks herbicide-sprayed by robot
    • 1 block hand-weeded
  • Objective: Introduce complementary structural diversity through a different crop type and plot arrangement, including weed control treatments for comparative analysis.

6. Data Structure

Raw data format (raw_data/[site]/[timestamp]/)

[timestamp]/
β”œβ”€β”€ LiDAR/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ imu_sync.bin              ← Raw IMU data from Mid-360 LiDAR
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ pointcloud_sync.bin       ← Timestamped LiDAR point clouds (binary)
β”œβ”€β”€ RGB-D/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ L.svo2                    ← Left ZED X SVO recording
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ L_info.csv                ← Left ZED IMU and timestamp info
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ R.svo2                    ← Right ZED X SVO recording
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ R_info.csv                ← Right ZED IMU and timestamp info
β”œβ”€β”€ sync_time.txt                 ← Global time sync info (ZED ↔ LiDAR)

Extracted data format (extracted_data/[site]/)

[site]/
β”œβ”€β”€ [timestamp]_RGB.mp4           ← 4 RGB views: L_L, L_R, R_L, R_R
β”œβ”€β”€ [timestamp]_Depth.mp4         ← RGB + Depth views: L_L_RGB, R_L_RGB, L_L_Depth, R_L_Depth
β”œβ”€β”€ [timestamp]_Lidar.mp4         ← RGB + Depth + LiDAR point clouds
β”œβ”€β”€ [timestamp].tar.gz            ← Compressed archive of the extracted [timestamp]/ folder

Extracted session folder (extracted_data/[site]/[timestamp]/)

[timestamp]/
β”œβ”€β”€ depth_npz_L/                  ← Depth (.npz) aligned to L_L camera
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ 00000.npz
β”œβ”€β”€ depth_npz_R/                  ← Depth (.npz) aligned to R_L camera
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ 00000.npz
β”œβ”€β”€ depth_png_L/                  ← Depth visualization (.png), aligned to L_L
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ 00000.png
β”œβ”€β”€ depth_png_R/                  ← Depth visualization (.png), aligned to R_L
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ 00000.png
β”œβ”€β”€ frame_L/                      ← PNG RGB frames from left ZED X
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ L_00000.png               ← L_L: left sensor of left ZED X
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ R_00000.png               ← L_R: right sensor of left ZED X
β”œβ”€β”€ frame_R/                      ← PNG RGB frames from right ZED X
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ L_00000.png               ← R_L: right sensor of left ZED X
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ R_00000.png               ← R_R: right sensor of left ZED X
β”œβ”€β”€ lidar/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ fov150                    ← LiDAR point clouds cropped to match ZED X stereo FoV (~150Β°)
β”‚   β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ 00000.ply             ← LiDAR point cloud for frame 0
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ fov360                    ← Full-range LiDAR point clouds (raw 360Β° FoV)
β”‚   β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ 00000.ply             
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ lidar_info.csv            ← Per-frame timestamp and IMU data from LiDAR
β”œβ”€β”€ zed_info.csv                  ← Per-frame timestamp and IMU data from ZED L and R
β”œβ”€β”€ pose_info.csv                 ← Per-frame timestamp and VIO Pose from ZED L and R

CSV Format

zed_info.csv

Column Description
L_frame_id, R_frame_id Matched frame IDs from left/right ZED
L_timestamp, R_timestamp Absolute timestamps (in seconds)
relative_time Time elapsed from the first ZED frame (starts at 0.0)
L_*, R_* IMU data from each ZED (accel_x/y/z, gyro_x/y/z)

pose_info.csv

Column Description
L_frame_id, R_frame_id Matched frame IDs from left/right ZED
L_timestamp, R_timestamp Absolute timestamps (in seconds)
L_*, R_* VIO Pose data from each ZED (trans_x/y/z, orien_x/y/z/w)

lidar_info.csv

Column Description
frame_id Frame index aligned with ZED relative time
timestamp Absolute timestamps (in seconds)
accel_*, gyro_* IMU data from LiDAR at the corresponding time

7. Camera Calibration

πŸ“· Left ZED X (4.0 mm)

  • Resolution: 1920 Γ— 1080 (FHD)

  • Intrinsic (shared by both sensors):

fx = 1258.97, fy = 1258.97
cx =  916.48, cy =  553.83
  • Extrinsic (Right β†’ Left transform):
[ 1.000000  0.000000  0.000000  120.009026 ]
[ 0.000000  1.000000  0.000000    0.000000 ]
[ 0.000000  0.000000  1.000000    0.000000 ]
[ 0.000000  0.000000  0.000000    1.000000 ]

πŸ“· Right ZED X (4.0 mm)

  • Resolution: 1920 Γ— 1080 (FHD)
  • Intrinsic (shared by both sensors):
fx = 1261.83, fy = 1261.83
cx =  978.86, cy =  535.06
  • Extrinsic (Right β†’ Left transform):
[ 1.000000  0.000000  0.000000  120.212349 ]
[ 0.000000  1.000000  0.000000    0.000000 ]
[ 0.000000  0.000000  1.000000    0.000000 ]
[ 0.000000  0.000000  0.000000    1.000000 ]

πŸ“œ Citation

@article{jeong2025agrichrono,
  title={AgriChrono: A Multi-modal Dataset Capturing Crop Growth and Lighting Variability with a Field Robot},
  author={Jeong, Jaehwan and Vu, Tuan-Anh and Jony, Mohammad and Ahmad, Shahab and Rahman, Md. Mukhlesur and Kim, Sangpil and Jawed, M. Khalid},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.18694},
  year={2025},
}

About

Data collected from Canola in Fargo, ND

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors