update: enhance resource permission management modal initialization#24985
Merged
update: enhance resource permission management modal initialization#24985
Conversation
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates the Permission Management module documentation so the Resource Permission Management modal is initialized correctly in MVC/Razor Pages scenarios (ensuring the modal script class is invoked as intended).
Changes:
- Updates the
abp.ModalManagerexample to use the object-parameter form. - Adds the missing
modalClass: 'ResourcePermissionManagement'option to the docs sample.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
|
We also need to add the script file to the page, it doesn't work without?
|
Member
Author
|
hi @abou-emish Yes, you need to add |
EngincanV
approved these changes
Mar 2, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves #24982