Closed
Conversation
Contributor
|
Hi @younke, thanks for your contribution. We have kept Your recommendation looks more like a good practice. Would you like to add a generic note instead in the Known practices and workarounds section? |
|
Contributor
|
Closing this PR as there is no response. But to make this clearer, the readme will be updated by giving better insights on |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previous example is somewhat misleading.
When new package is added, old cache is being restored, which may lead to package resolve errors as described here.
Considering this guide:
We mustn't use restore-keys for spm cache.