If this looks good to you, please add the hacktoberfest-accepted label to this PR :)

Codecov Report

Merging #6 (3163b8e) into main (b614ba8) will increase coverage by 8.14%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main       #6      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   17.89%   26.04%   +8.14%     
==========================================
  Files           4        4              
  Lines          95       96       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits           17       25       +8     
+ Misses         76       69       -7     
  Partials        2        2              

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b614ba8...3163b8e. Read the comment docs.

Hi @willmadison, thanks for the PR! Please also include your changes in the cursor_windows.go file :)

Hi @willmadison, thanks for the PR! Please also include your changes in the cursor_windows.go file :)

Happy to! I just wasn't sure that a generic writer would be congruent with the proprietary approach taken on the windows side given that io.Writers don't have a file descriptor which can be passed to syscall.Handle. What's the recommendation on how cursor_windows.go should allow for custom io.Writers in that context?

I am also not quite sure how we could do this on Windows. But we need the function SetTarget at least, so that the tests pass and the lib compiles cross-platform. Even if it doesn't do anything. BTW, could you also please add a short description to SetTarget, thanks. Maybe you could also add that setting a different target will not work for Windows 😉

I am also not quite sure how we could do this on Windows. But we need the function SetTarget at least, so that the tests pass and the lib compiles cross-platform. Even if it doesn't do anything. BTW, could you also please add a short description to SetTarget, thanks. Maybe you could also add that setting a different target will not work for Windows wink

Done! Also if you could please add the tag hacktoberfest-accepted to this PR that'd be awesome! Thanks!

Thanks @willmadison! I'd prefer not to add the hacktoberfest-accepted to the repo, as it will stick here forever then. You don't actually need the label anyway. Either the PR gets merged (which it will), or the label is added. Both scenarios will result in a finished Hacktoberfest PR 😄

PS: The tests fail under windows, maybe you could add a check inside the test, and if it's windows, just let it pass ^^

@MarvinJWendt sorry to be a pest here, but it looks like things may have changed this year so if the PR (not the entire project) isn't opted in it won't get counted by the organizers. So if we could just tag the PR as 'hacktoberfest-accepted` that should suffice (without opting the entire project/repository in)

See more here:

Sorry! I forgot to opt this repo in. I thought we have the Hacktoberfest topic, as I added it to most of my recent projects, but as it seems not to this one.