I might prefer pointing out that nodes SHOULD NOT relay prior to validating unless their peer has sufficient version as well.

On November 3, 2016 8:37:12 AM EDT, Suhas Daftuar [email protected] wrote:

@TheBlueMatt I tried to draft something to reflect the p2p banning
behavior being properly implemented by signaling the version bump, how
does this look to you?

In particular, do you think the first SHOULD NOT I added (regarding not
banning peers for an invalid compact block) should be a MUST NOT?
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

#473

-- Commit Summary --

• [BIP 152] Fix invalid link
• [BIP 152] Bump p2p protocol for proper banning behavior

-- File Changes --

M bip-0152.mediawiki (4)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/473.patch
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/473.diff

You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#473

Makes sense, updated.

ACK

On November 3, 2016 8:37:12 AM EDT, Suhas Daftuar [email protected] wrote:

@TheBlueMatt I tried to draft something to reflect the p2p banning
behavior being properly implemented by signaling the version bump, how
does this look to you?

In particular, do you think the first SHOULD NOT I added (regarding not
banning peers for an invalid compact block) should be a MUST NOT?
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

#473

-- Commit Summary --

• [BIP 152] Fix invalid link
• [BIP 152] Bump p2p protocol for proper banning behavior

-- File Changes --

M bip-0152.mediawiki (4)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/473.patch
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/473.diff

You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#473