configure: UniValue 1.0.4 is required for pushKV(, bool)#12666
Merged
laanwj merged 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom Mar 14, 2018
Merged
configure: UniValue 1.0.4 is required for pushKV(, bool)#12666laanwj merged 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom
laanwj merged 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
Ah so this is what you meant the other day. |
Member
|
Makes sense, utACK 8172d3a |
Contributor
|
utACK 8172d3a |
laanwj
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 14, 2018
8172d3a configure: UniValue 1.0.4 is required for pushKV(, bool) (Luke Dashjr) Pull request description: The breaking changes (#12193) are already merged, so this blocks 0.17.0. It depends on jgarzik/univalue#42 or jgarzik/univalue#50 being merged and released in UniValue 1.0.4. Tree-SHA512: 3a21bbc72d6632bd07ee60ad7780b9ee95908357bcf59b4795b693d8a5d8c88943d6451482f11916ff5417e3bdbb9916062f87d0d73e79f50eb95ddabe21f943
Member
|
Isn't this merge premature given that 1.0.4. isn't released yet? Or should there be a ticket in the 0.17 milestone to make sure 1.0.4 is released and compatible? |
PastaPastaPasta
pushed a commit
to PastaPastaPasta/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 13, 2020
…(, bool) 8172d3a configure: UniValue 1.0.4 is required for pushKV(, bool) (Luke Dashjr) Pull request description: The breaking changes (bitcoin#12193) are already merged, so this blocks 0.17.0. It depends on jgarzik/univalue#42 or jgarzik/univalue#50 being merged and released in UniValue 1.0.4. Tree-SHA512: 3a21bbc72d6632bd07ee60ad7780b9ee95908357bcf59b4795b693d8a5d8c88943d6451482f11916ff5417e3bdbb9916062f87d0d73e79f50eb95ddabe21f943
gades
pushed a commit
to cosanta/cosanta-core
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 26, 2021
…(, bool) 8172d3a configure: UniValue 1.0.4 is required for pushKV(, bool) (Luke Dashjr) Pull request description: The breaking changes (bitcoin#12193) are already merged, so this blocks 0.17.0. It depends on jgarzik/univalue#42 or jgarzik/univalue#50 being merged and released in UniValue 1.0.4. Tree-SHA512: 3a21bbc72d6632bd07ee60ad7780b9ee95908357bcf59b4795b693d8a5d8c88943d6451482f11916ff5417e3bdbb9916062f87d0d73e79f50eb95ddabe21f943
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
8 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The breaking changes (#12193) are already merged, so this blocks 0.17.0.
It depends on jgarzik/univalue#42 or jgarzik/univalue#50 being merged and released in UniValue 1.0.4.