util: Pass pthread_self() to pthread_setschedparam instead of 0#12923
Merged
laanwj merged 2 commits intobitcoin:masterfrom Apr 9, 2018
Merged
util: Pass pthread_self() to pthread_setschedparam instead of 0#12923laanwj merged 2 commits intobitcoin:masterfrom
laanwj merged 2 commits intobitcoin:masterfrom
Conversation
Nowhere in the man page of `pthread_setschedparam` it is mentioned that `0` is a valid value. The example uses `pthread_self()`, so should we. (noticed by Anthony Towns)
Member
|
@eklitzke Mind to take a look here? |
Member
|
Concept ACK cff66e6 (fixes the issue for me, didn't review though) |
Contributor
|
utACK cff66e6 |
Member
Author
|
So on IRC it was mentioned that
Should I make this change here too? It's curious that it does compile (as our build explicitly passes |
Contributor
|
utACK cff66e6 Neither clang nor gcc seems to warn about designated initializers with c++11. I think this is the only use of one in the codebase currently, so removing it is probably fine. |
Although no compiler appears to complain about it, these are not valid for c++11. (http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/aggregate_initialization says they're c++20) The structure is defined as: struct sched_param { int sched_priority; }; So passing 0 for the first field has the same effect.
Contributor
|
utACK cff66e6.
Looks good. |
Contributor
|
utACK b86730a. |
Contributor
|
utACK b86730a |
laanwj
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 9, 2018
…ead of 0 b86730a util: Remove designator initializer from ScheduleBatchPriority (Wladimir J. van der Laan) cff66e6 util: Pass pthread_self() to pthread_setschedparam instead of 0 (Wladimir J. van der Laan) Pull request description: Nowhere in the man page of `pthread_setschedparam` it is mentioned that `0` is a valid value. The example uses `pthread_self()`, so should we. (noticed by Anthony Towns) Fixes #12915. Tree-SHA512: 249e93b1ae7e3ba28de6ee6288400b91d21ca1b4ca41d82211f6c9609b62deb5ac87182c7bf08471d3a3e0c1af314c9ecd41f8ae864febe963b1de8a816dd82f
|
I Noticed this aswell.. fixed it with self() |
Fabcien
pushed a commit
to Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 30, 2019
…ead of 0 Summary: b86730a util: Remove designator initializer from ScheduleBatchPriority (Wladimir J. van der Laan) cff66e6 util: Pass pthread_self() to pthread_setschedparam instead of 0 (Wladimir J. van der Laan) Pull request description: Nowhere in the man page of `pthread_setschedparam` it is mentioned that `0` is a valid value. The example uses `pthread_self()`, so should we. (noticed by Anthony Towns) Fixes #12915. Tree-SHA512: 249e93b1ae7e3ba28de6ee6288400b91d21ca1b4ca41d82211f6c9609b62deb5ac87182c7bf08471d3a3e0c1af314c9ecd41f8ae864febe963b1de8a816dd82f Backport of Core PR12923 bitcoin/bitcoin#12923 Depends on D3953 Test Plan: make check test_runner.py Reviewers: deadalnix, Fabien, jasonbcox, O1 Bitcoin ABC, #bitcoin_abc Reviewed By: deadalnix, O1 Bitcoin ABC, #bitcoin_abc Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D3954
PastaPastaPasta
pushed a commit
to PastaPastaPasta/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2020
…am instead of 0 b86730a util: Remove designator initializer from ScheduleBatchPriority (Wladimir J. van der Laan) cff66e6 util: Pass pthread_self() to pthread_setschedparam instead of 0 (Wladimir J. van der Laan) Pull request description: Nowhere in the man page of `pthread_setschedparam` it is mentioned that `0` is a valid value. The example uses `pthread_self()`, so should we. (noticed by Anthony Towns) Fixes bitcoin#12915. Tree-SHA512: 249e93b1ae7e3ba28de6ee6288400b91d21ca1b4ca41d82211f6c9609b62deb5ac87182c7bf08471d3a3e0c1af314c9ecd41f8ae864febe963b1de8a816dd82f
furszy
added a commit
to PIVX-Project/PIVX
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 13, 2021
…ead of 0 48b3bc4 util: Remove designator initializer from ScheduleBatchPriority (Wladimir J. van der Laan) 886b6ca util: Pass pthread_self() to pthread_setschedparam instead of 0 (Wladimir J. van der Laan) Pull request description: Coming straight from bitcoin#12923. Fixes a bug introduced in #2212 for **some** POSIX linux systems (observed on CentOS 7 currently) Original upstream text: > Nowhere in the man page of pthread_setschedparam it is mentioned that 0 is a valid value. The example uses pthread_self(), so should we. ACKs for top commit: furszy: utACK 48b3bc4 random-zebra: utACK 48b3bc4 Tree-SHA512: b7976efbe4659a20ca88e958dc419d6cf9a11867c0a1dc021af722f5878b4574a160680b35fecca348231c5477f52fd0a1e336f76968127acf0f5c018e2b6de7
TheArbitrator
pushed a commit
to TheArbitrator/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 4, 2021
…am instead of 0 b86730a util: Remove designator initializer from ScheduleBatchPriority (Wladimir J. van der Laan) cff66e6 util: Pass pthread_self() to pthread_setschedparam instead of 0 (Wladimir J. van der Laan) Pull request description: Nowhere in the man page of `pthread_setschedparam` it is mentioned that `0` is a valid value. The example uses `pthread_self()`, so should we. (noticed by Anthony Towns) Fixes bitcoin#12915. Tree-SHA512: 249e93b1ae7e3ba28de6ee6288400b91d21ca1b4ca41d82211f6c9609b62deb5ac87182c7bf08471d3a3e0c1af314c9ecd41f8ae864febe963b1de8a816dd82f
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
7 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Nowhere in the man page of
pthread_setschedparamit is mentioned that0is a valid value. The example usespthread_self(), so should we.(noticed by Anthony Towns)
Fixes #12915.