Conversation
0d539fb to
bb9f28b
Compare
|
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers. ConflictsReviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:
If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first. |
15ddf9f to
ebe3d1f
Compare
src/rpc/blockchain.cpp
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
note: "push_back(Pair" is deprecated in favor of pushKV
|
Might be wortwhile to update it to using output descriptors, like |
|
@instagibbs Thanks for the remarks, how about adding support for descriptors in separate PR? |
|
@mgrychow, I recently started working on an address-based index (not just for UTXOs) at #14053. I can improve my PR quite a bit using your changes to the ValidationInterface. If you separated that change (adding CBlockUndo's) into it's own commit this PR would be a bit cleaner, and I could use it for the address index :) Anyway, will be reviewing this since it's pretty similar to the PR I just made. |
|
@mgrychow Not going to bikeshed this PR to death, just noting it in case you've missed it. |
37562b7 to
9eeb194
Compare
9eeb194 to
3b6f42c
Compare
3b6f42c to
a8294c2
Compare
a81937d to
94c1d5c
Compare
94c1d5c to
34c8e8e
Compare
|
Rebased |
| Needs rebase |
Changes cherry-picked from bitcoin#14035. Co-authored-by: Maciej Grychowski <[email protected]>
|
There hasn't been much activity lately and the patch still needs rebase, so I am closing this for now. Please let me know when you want to continue working on this, so the pull request can be re-opened. |
Changes cherry-picked from bitcoin#14035. Co-authored-by: Maciej Grychowski <[email protected]>
Yet another attempt to introduce UTxO index by script. Based on #9806 with review remarks and new index framework introduced in #13033 taken into account.