doc: Update wallet files in files.md#20152
Merged
fanquake merged 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom Oct 27, 2020
Merged
Conversation
Member
Author
sidhujag
pushed a commit
to syscoin/syscoin
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2020
defe48a doc: Update wallet files in files.md (Hennadii Stepanov) Pull request description: This PR is a bitcoin#19077 follow up, and it addresses the [comment](bitcoin#19077 (comment)): > If need to update, there are two corrections that could be made: > > * Line 69 "Wallets are Berkeley DB (BDB) databases" is no longer true > > * Line 76 "Wallet lock file" should say "BDB wallet lock file" ACKs for top commit: RiccardoMasutti: ACK defe48a meshcollider: ACK defe48a Tree-SHA512: 39939f86a9c7842bf06913998305dcbd6209585f1da0fe9c274bac0572eb8464e59176884dd9e2b91312f34efad40cdeb4085ec72c2a2c1b33d16b6ab505140c
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is a #19077 follow up, and it addresses the comment: