test: Actually fail when a python unit test fails#29068
Merged
fanquake merged 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom Dec 13, 2023
Merged
test: Actually fail when a python unit test fails#29068fanquake merged 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom
fanquake merged 1 commit intobitcoin:masterfrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers. Code CoverageFor detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report. ReviewsSee the guideline for information on the review process.
If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update. |
Member
Author
|
Can be tested with something like: diff --git a/test/functional/test_framework/crypto/bip324_cipher.py b/test/functional/test_framework/crypto/bip324_cipher.py
index 56190647f2..56211e231d 100644
--- a/test/functional/test_framework/crypto/bip324_cipher.py
+++ b/test/functional/test_framework/crypto/bip324_cipher.py
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ class FSChaCha20Poly1305:
# Test vectors from RFC8439 consisting of plaintext, aad, 32 byte key, 12 byte nonce and ciphertext
AEAD_TESTS = [
# RFC 8439 Example from section 2.8.2
- ["4c616469657320616e642047656e746c656d656e206f662074686520636c6173"
+ ["5c616469657320616e642047656e746c656d656e206f662074686520636c6173"
"73206f66202739393a204966204920636f756c64206f6666657220796f75206f"
"6e6c79206f6e652074697020666f7220746865206675747572652c2073756e73"
"637265656e20776f756c642062652069742e",And then calling |
Member
Author
|
Fun fact: This problem would not exist in a type-safe language. |
theStack
approved these changes
Dec 13, 2023
Member
It's time to start rewriting code in such a language. |
PastaPastaPasta
pushed a commit
to PastaPastaPasta/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2024
fa0534d test: Actually fail when a python unit test fails (MarcoFalke) Pull request description: Currently python unit test failures are ignored. Fix this. ACKs for top commit: theStack: ACK fa0534d BrandonOdiwuor: ACK fa0534d Tree-SHA512: c136be4c8d861d966f380e04d5d14b711b90c4011101302dae1332496e493207c5c673927586ed35b02b61a0b050bf45053a31e6ff766ec52f1d054caf0985e2
PastaPastaPasta
added a commit
to dashpay/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2024
8bf1d06 Merge bitcoin#29308: doc: update `BroadcastTransaction` comment (glozow) 2a77808 Merge bitcoin-core/gui#789: Avoid non-self-contained Windows header (Hennadii Stepanov) da371b8 Merge bitcoin#28870: depends: Include `config.guess` and `config.sub` into `meta_depends` (fanquake) 2e41562 Merge bitcoin#29219: fuzz: Improve fuzzing stability for ellswift_roundtrip harness (fanquake) b091329 Merge bitcoin#29211: fuzz: fix `connman` initialization (Ava Chow) df42d41 Merge bitcoin#29200: net: create I2P sessions using both ECIES-X25519 and ElGamal encryption (fanquake) 4cdd1a8 Merge bitcoin#29172: fuzz: set `nMaxOutboundLimit` in connman target (fanquake) 97012ea Merge bitcoin#28962: doc: Rework guix docs after 1.4 release (fanquake) c70ff5d Merge bitcoin#28844: contrib: drop GCC MAX_VERSION to 4.3.0 in symbol-check (fanquake) e6f19e7 Merge bitcoin#29068: test: Actually fail when a python unit test fails (fanquake) 75e0334 Merge bitcoin#28989: test: Fix test by checking the actual exception instance (Andrew Chow) 8cd85d3 Merge bitcoin#28852: script, assumeutxo: Enhance validations in utxo_snapshot.sh (Ryan Ofsky) fd2e88d Merge bitcoin#26077: guix: switch from `guix environment` to `guix shell` (fanquake) 02741a7 Merge bitcoin#28913: coins: make sure PoolAllocator uses the correct alignment (fanquake) dfd53da Merge bitcoin#28902: doc: Simplify guix install doc, after 1.4 release (fanquake) Pull request description: ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented Batch of trivial backports ## What was done? See commits ## How Has This Been Tested? built locally; large combined merge passed tests locally ## Breaking Changes Should be none ## Checklist: _Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._ - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_ ACKs for top commit: UdjinM6: utACK 8bf1d06 knst: utACK 8bf1d06 Tree-SHA512: 506273e5a188f9ca74edf656e3cd338992192e6e97f68c89fc43e34be20fb7f211b48e4dfa8693727839a7920da8284509413c722f55774a428939c296dad517
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently python unit test failures are ignored.
Fix this.