Closed
Conversation
Member
|
Previous discussion was in #7349, where it was decided not to automatically use an installed univalue in favor of the included one. |
Member
Author
|
...for now. |
Contributor
|
Why would you opt for system default? Out of interest. |
Member
Author
|
Standard best practices. Libraries shouldn't be bundled at all. We have a reasonable case for bundling consensus-critical ones like LevelDB and libsecp256k1, but Univalue is not consensus-critical at all. |
Member
|
We're not going to do this (at least for the forseeable future), so closing for now. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For future merging