Merged
Conversation
This test is no longer relevant. It was introduced in 8c222dc to check the switch to 1MB blocks after the BDB too-many-locks issue back in 2013. The switching code has been long since removed. It also needs a specific data file that is hard to find. I've verified in bitcoin#6320 that it still passes, however I think there is zero reason to keep it. Closes bitcoin#6320.
Contributor
|
ACK laanwj@acf5983 |
Contributor
|
utACK laanwj@acf5983 |
laanwj
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 10, 2016
acf5983 tests: Remove May15 test (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
codablock
pushed a commit
to codablock/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 11, 2017
acf5983 tests: Remove May15 test (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This test is no longer relevant.
It was introduced in 8c222dc to check the switch to 1MB blocks after the BDB too-many-locks issue back in 2013. The switching code has been long since removed.
It also needs a specific data file that is hard to find. I've verified in #6320 that it still passes, however I think there is zero reason to keep it.
Closes #6320.