sso: support multiple identity providers#212
Merged
Conversation
200b17c to
c5a6983
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #212 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 62.34% 61.19% -1.15%
==========================================
Files 49 50 +1
Lines 4002 4069 +67
==========================================
- Hits 2495 2490 -5
- Misses 1352 1392 +40
- Partials 155 187 +32
|
85db1b6 to
31fb614
Compare
Contributor
|
Below is a list of
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
We've been walking down the path to support multiple identity providers in several previous iterations. This last remaining stand is how to support configuration for multiple and different identity providers. The existing configuration structure is pretty inflexible and rigid when it comes to defining configuration, especially given our constraint to use environment variables.
We previously introduced
viperto help solve some of these problems, but viper proved frustrating and lacking enough opinion to operate within. We roll that solution back here and instead use https://micro.mu/docs/go-config.htmlSolution
We introduced a new configuration component based on https://micro.mu/docs/go-config.html to build this new, more complicated configuration mechanism. This is a ground-up re-write of the configuration mechanism we use, found separately in
configuration.go.Notes
This now looks like: