Skip to content

Wait for the actual best block chainlock in llmq-chainlocks.py#3109

Merged
codablock merged 2 commits intodashpay:developfrom
UdjinM6:waitforthebest
Sep 27, 2019
Merged

Wait for the actual best block chainlock in llmq-chainlocks.py#3109
codablock merged 2 commits intodashpay:developfrom
UdjinM6:waitforthebest

Conversation

@UdjinM6
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 commented Sep 24, 2019

Node 0 is the one with the longest chain (and the one that should propagate it to other nodes), node 1 might not have the best block right after the reconnect.

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 added this to the 14.1 milestone Sep 24, 2019
codablock
codablock previously approved these changes Sep 24, 2019
Copy link

@codablock codablock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK nice catch

@codablock
Copy link

Test failure is due to retroactive signing taking longer then 15 seconds (was very close as of logs). This did not happen before because we were waiting for a too early CLSIG before. Increasing the timeout in wait_for_chainlock should help.

Copy link

@codablock codablock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

re-utACK

Build failure is unrelated and should be fixed in a separate PR (https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/develop/test/functional/wallet-encryption.py#L45 should be bumped to 3)

Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, utACK

Copy link

@nmarley nmarley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK

@codablock codablock merged commit 43b7c31 into dashpay:develop Sep 27, 2019
@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 deleted the waitforthebest branch November 26, 2020 13:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants