refactor: introduce enum class for MnType and clean up implementation accordingly#5200
Merged
ogabrielides merged 3 commits intodashpay:developfrom Feb 16, 2023
Merged
refactor: introduce enum class for MnType and clean up implementation accordingly#5200ogabrielides merged 3 commits intodashpay:developfrom
ogabrielides merged 3 commits intodashpay:developfrom
Conversation
5 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
expressions like
nType == MnType::HighPerformance.indexlook pretty confusing in current implementation of 4k HPMN.Changing
uint8_tindex toenum class MnType : uint8_tgive pros:.indexfrom MnTypeBut also Cons:
log("%d", nType)you need to writelog("%d", static_cast<int>(nType));What was done?
Introduced new enum class MnType and rewritten generating Regular/HighPerformance objects with params (description, collateral amount, etc).
Also were added attributes [[no_discard]] for related code.
How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests
Breaking Changes
No breaking changes.
Checklist: