Closed
Conversation
…Inputs 9b92538 Remove unused fScriptChecks parameter from CheckInputs (Matt Corallo) Pull request description: fScriptChecks = false just short-circuits the entire function, so passing it in is entirely useless. This is extracted from bitcoin#13233 /cc TheBlueMatt. Recommend reviewing with `git show --ignore-all-space`, i.e.: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13868/files?w=1 ACKs for top commit: TheBlueMatt: utACK 9b92538. Checked diff had no functional change and new comment copy looks correct. kallewoof: ACK 9b92538 ajtowns: ACK 9b92538 ; code review, checked tests work. Looks right to me, and fanquake's notes make sense. Could change the coinbase early exit to `assert(!tx.IsCoinBase());`. fanquake: ACK 9b92538 - Notes / testing below. Tree-SHA512: add253a3e8cf4b33eddbc49efcec333c14b5ea61c7d34e43230351d40cff6adc919a75b91c72c4de8647a395284db74a61639f4c67848d4b2fec3a705b557790
…ng smaller parts 4a87c5c [refactor] Rewrite AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker() using smaller parts (Suhas Daftuar) Pull request description: This is in preparation for re-using these validation components for a new version of AcceptToMemoryPool() that can operate on multiple transactions ("package relay"). ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: re-ACK 4a87c5c (did the rebase myself and arrived at the same result, mod whitespace) laanwj: ACK 4a87c5c Tree-SHA512: b0495c026ffe06146258bace3d5e0c9aaf23fa65f89f258abc4af5980812e68e63a799f1d923e78ac1ee6bcafaf1222b2c2690a527df9b65dff7b48a013f154e
Collaborator
Author
|
So far as changes integrated into #5235 there's nothing to merge anymore. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
These backports are prior work for PR #5235 "prune g_chainman usage"
What was done?
Were backported changes from bitcoin:
How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests
Breaking Changes
No breaking changes
Checklist: