feat: reduce spamming logs with messages from v20 features#5669
Merged
PastaPastaPasta merged 2 commits intodashpay:developfrom Nov 6, 2023
Merged
feat: reduce spamming logs with messages from v20 features#5669PastaPastaPasta merged 2 commits intodashpay:developfrom
PastaPastaPasta merged 2 commits intodashpay:developfrom
Conversation
UdjinM6
requested changes
Nov 3, 2023
Member
|
I think most of these should use LogPrint and not LogPrintf |
PastaPastaPasta
approved these changes
Nov 6, 2023
Member
PastaPastaPasta
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
utACK for squash merge
5 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
There's too much spamming log items related to new v20 features: credit pool, asset locks, EHF manager, EHF Signaling for MN_RR.
Some logs are still spamming after this PR but related code is not changed here #5658
What was done?
How Has This Been Tested?
Run unit/functional tests, reviewed log output
Breaking Changes
N/A
Checklist: