docs: mention building for some HOSTs only in release-process.md#6393
Merged
PastaPastaPasta merged 2 commits intodashpay:developfrom Nov 26, 2024
Merged
docs: mention building for some HOSTs only in release-process.md#6393PastaPastaPasta merged 2 commits intodashpay:developfrom
release-process.md#6393PastaPastaPasta merged 2 commits intodashpay:developfrom
Conversation
0d6aac9 to
55d7463
Compare
release-process.mdrelease-process.md
2 tasks
knst
previously approved these changes
Nov 15, 2024
Co-authored-by: PastaPastaPasta <[email protected]>
knst
reviewed
Nov 25, 2024
| - [Building](/contrib/guix/README.md#building) | ||
| - [Attesting to build outputs](/contrib/guix/README.md#attesting-to-build-outputs) | ||
|
|
||
| _Note: we ship releases for only some supported HOSTs so consider providing limited `HOSTS` variable or run `./contrib/containers/guix/scripts/guix-start` instead of `./contrib/guix/guix-build` when building binaries for quicker builds that exclude the supported but not shipped HOSTs_ |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
maybe expand a bit?
-for quicker builds
+for quicker builds and less size of artefacts saved on github
?
knst
approved these changes
Nov 25, 2024
knst
pushed a commit
to knst/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2024
…lease-process.md` 87c31ad Update doc/release-process.md (UdjinM6) 55d7463 docs: mention building for some HOSTs only in `release-process.md` (UdjinM6) Pull request description: ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented dashpay/guix.sigs#73 dashpay#6390 follow-up ## What was done? ## How Has This Been Tested? ## Breaking Changes ## Checklist: - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_ Top commit has no ACKs. Tree-SHA512: b4a2cadf5899a8aea6612b4ff9c0e9f9c530a9e2344eb090967fbcf9a2ab219aff02f11f86434e4082f84c401d578cf2d033b6838c94705f532beca4ab604986
PastaPastaPasta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2024
8b88ff7 Merge #6414: chore: bump seeds for v22 (pasta) 02ad523 Merge #6411: chore: update nMinimumChainWork, defaultAssumeValid, checkpointData, chainTxData for mainnet and testnet (pasta) 3bbcd3d Merge #6393: docs: mention building for some HOSTs only in `release-process.md` (pasta) 18f636f Merge #6426: fix: respect SENDDSQUEUE message, move DSQ relay into net processing / peerman (pasta) 9fed456 Merge #6407: fix: dataraces (pasta) 86105da Merge #6408: refactor: removed pre-MN_RR logic of validation of CL (pasta) a1f7e96 Merge #6406: ci: use `actions/cache` to manage depends cache (pasta) 90a3807 Merge #6402: ci: cache built (pasta) 66f6787 Merge #6401: ci: deduplicate depends building (pasta) 7ca5663 Merge #6397: ci: add powerpc64 to GH Guix job matrix (pasta) Pull request description: ## What was done? See commits for each particular change ## How Has This Been Tested? To be deployed on testnet ## Breaking Changes N/A ## Checklist: - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_ ACKs for top commit: UdjinM6: utACK 8b88ff7 PastaPastaPasta: utACK 8b88ff7 Tree-SHA512: f7fac62996873503e7de875cc96d9cdf5675674345f1bb1df4a16bf19bddc17bc395a80cc761363a0121022d42c46fb313b0973b9cc71f568ef55c6b3d9e29d8
PastaPastaPasta
added a commit
to PastaPastaPasta/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2024
1c7bfcb chore: set release true (pasta) c90339e Merge dashpay#6459: docs: add release notes for v22.0.0 (pasta) a6f1fc5 Merge dashpay#6475: chore: bumped chain assumed sizes based on latest usage (pasta) d7cd9f1 Merge dashpay#6464: chore: update man pages for v22 (pasta) 212f91c Merge dashpay#6461: docs: update supported versions in SECURITY.md (pasta) 9a8b685 Merge dashpay#6460: chore: Translations 2024-12 (pasta) 2f71f4d Merge dashpay#6458: chore: bump MIN_MASTERNODE_PROTO_VERSION to latest proto (pasta) fa29ed5 Merge dashpay#6456: fix(qt): allow refreshing wallet data without crashing (pasta) 758cd64 Merge dashpay#6452: fix: store ready queues on the mixing masternode (pasta) 395447b Merge dashpay#6451: depends: update 'src/dashbls' to dashpay/bls-signatures@7e747e8a as 62fa665 (pasta) c7b0d80 Merge dashpay#6441: fix: hold wallet shared pointer in CJ Manager/Sessions to prevent concurrent unload (pasta) c074e09 Merge dashpay#6444: fix: add platform transfer to "most common" filter (pasta) cb04114 Merge dashpay#6442: fix: coin selection with `include_unsafe` option should respect `nCoinType` (pasta) db5b53a Merge dashpay#6434: fix: early EHF and buried EHF are indistinguish (pasta) 8b88ff7 Merge dashpay#6414: chore: bump seeds for v22 (pasta) 02ad523 Merge dashpay#6411: chore: update nMinimumChainWork, defaultAssumeValid, checkpointData, chainTxData for mainnet and testnet (pasta) 3bbcd3d Merge dashpay#6393: docs: mention building for some HOSTs only in `release-process.md` (pasta) 18f636f Merge dashpay#6426: fix: respect SENDDSQUEUE message, move DSQ relay into net processing / peerman (pasta) 9fed456 Merge dashpay#6407: fix: dataraces (pasta) 86105da Merge dashpay#6408: refactor: removed pre-MN_RR logic of validation of CL (pasta) a1f7e96 Merge dashpay#6406: ci: use `actions/cache` to manage depends cache (pasta) 90a3807 Merge dashpay#6402: ci: cache built (pasta) 66f6787 Merge dashpay#6401: ci: deduplicate depends building (pasta) 7ca5663 Merge dashpay#6397: ci: add powerpc64 to GH Guix job matrix (pasta) Pull request description: ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented ## What was done? Suppressed changes from 1c7bfcb and resolved merge conflicts. ``` Auto-merging .github/workflows/build.yml Auto-merging configure.ac Auto-merging src/chainparams.cpp Auto-merging src/coinjoin/client.cpp CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coinjoin/client.cpp Auto-merging src/coinjoin/client.h CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coinjoin/client.h Auto-merging src/coinjoin/util.cpp CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coinjoin/util.cpp Auto-merging src/coinjoin/util.h CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/coinjoin/util.h Auto-merging src/evo/specialtxman.cpp Auto-merging src/init.cpp Auto-merging src/net_processing.cpp CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/net_processing.cpp Auto-merging src/net_processing.h Auto-merging src/qt/transactiontablemodel.cpp Auto-merging src/wallet/wallet.cpp Auto-merging src/wallet/wallet.h CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in src/wallet/wallet.h Auto-merging test/functional/feature_llmq_chainlocks.py CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in test/functional/feature_llmq_chainlocks.py ``` ## How Has This Been Tested? ## Breaking Changes ## Checklist: - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_ ACKs for top commit: PastaPastaPasta: utACK d108579; no diff to develop Tree-SHA512: 3f063011224880fee35edb04ce265dff33a52273c3d45ef1dbcebcecb22c25d8ad7c91b83514f36142716a6fbd0ddd3a8a3f2a9b59ce78ce975bbce69a2a13b5
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
dashpay/guix.sigs#73
#6390 follow-up
What was done?
How Has This Been Tested?
Breaking Changes
Checklist: