Skip to content

[mono] Switch to shared implementation of LowLevelLock #48031

@CoffeeFlux

Description

@CoffeeFlux

We seem to have a separate one in our CoreLib for some reason, introduced as part of mono/mono#17387. Ideally we would get rid of that and just set FeatureSharedLowLevelLock, but is used by the threadpool so it's possible it will impact TE perf numbers.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions