Remove temporary buffer in ConfigFile.ino#8298
Merged
d-a-v merged 1 commit intoesp8266:masterfrom Sep 16, 2021
Merged
Conversation
Collaborator
The least we could do is to ask you to add a comment / link to your example from within this example. |
Collaborator
|
@bblanchon can you please merge this with current head? Your GH settings don't allow us to update this PR, and it;s out of date so can't merge. |
66ac3b1 to
16f4f4e
Compare
Collaborator
|
I suggest to add this comment: #include <ArduinoJson.h>
#include "FS.h"
#include <LittleFS.h>
+ // more and possibly updated information can be found at:
+ // https://arduinojson.org/v6/example/config/
bool loadConfig() { |
When reading from a `Stream`, like `File`, using a temporary buffer is counterproductive because it complexifies the code and increases memory usage. It's also a source of confusion because it can create dangling pointers in the `JsonDocument`. The only benefit of using a buffer is the reading speed, but I don't think speed is the focus in this example; if it were, it would use a buffer in `saveConfig()` too.
16f4f4e to
ada9fe9
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
I amended the commit to include the comments suggested by @d-a-v. |
d-a-v
approved these changes
Sep 16, 2021
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi,
Thank you guys for maintaining this critical piece of software that is at the heart of so many projects 👍
This PR simplifies the
ConfigFile.inoexample by removing the temporary buffer and passing theFiledirectly todeserializeJson().When reading from a
Stream, using a temporary buffer is counterproductive because it complexifies the code and increases memory usage. It's also a source of confusion because it can create dangling pointers in theJsonDocument.The only benefit of using a buffer is the reading speed, but I don't think speed is the focus in this example; if it were, it would use a buffer in
saveConfig()too.By the way, this example has been the origin of many issues in ArduinoJson's tracker:
It seems that I've been doing the customer service for this example, so I wonder if it's wise to keep it considering there is a comparable example in ArduinoJson, with the differences that it uses SD instead of LittleFS and it shows how to apply best practices by copying the data in a
struct.Please let me know what you think.
Best regards,
Benoit