…tter#173459)

…tter#173459)

flutter/flutter@3821790...1590543

2025-08-09 [email protected] Make device debuggable if useDwdsWebSocketConnection is true and added simple test case (flutter/flutter#171648)
2025-08-09 [email protected] Roll Dart SDK from 91cbf6d7563a to 6a7ae1ffd1c9 (1 revision) (flutter/flutter#173487)
2025-08-09 [email protected] add `--variance host_debug_unopt_arm64` for apple chip simulator (flutter/flutter#173475)
2025-08-08 [email protected] [WebParagraph] Fix a property name on newer Chrome versions (flutter/flutter#173477)
2025-08-08 [email protected] Make sure that a Checkbox doesn't crash in 0x0 environment (flutter/flutter#173178)
2025-08-08 [email protected] Make sure that a RawChip doesn't crash in 0x0 environment (flutter/flutter#173265)
2025-08-08 [email protected] Fix tooltip crash when route has secondary animation (flutter/flutter#172678)
2025-08-08 [email protected] Roll Skia from 86824ed582be to 44bb9d908ee4 (3 revisions) (flutter/flutter#173476)
2025-08-08 [email protected] Fix null value reference in `flutter logs` path (flutter/flutter#173437)
2025-08-08 [email protected] Remove jetifier usages from framework and engine (flutter/flutter#173459)
2025-08-08 [email protected] [a11y] Textfield has flag `isFocusable` set to true  (flutter/flutter#173235)
2025-08-08 [email protected] Roll Dart SDK from 4b7b565eb468 to 91cbf6d7563a (1 revision) (flutter/flutter#173469)
2025-08-08 [email protected] Roll Packages from 6efb759 to 34948d1 (4 revisions) (flutter/flutter#173470)
2025-08-08 [email protected] Roll Skia from a6ccfeafbfba to 86824ed582be (20 revisions) (flutter/flutter#173468)

If this roll has caused a breakage, revert this CL and stop the roller
using the controls here:
https://autoroll.skia.org/r/flutter-packages
Please CC [email protected],[email protected] on the revert to ensure that a human
is aware of the problem.

To file a bug in Packages: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/new/choose

To report a problem with the AutoRoller itself, please file a bug:
https://issues.skia.org/issues/new?component=1389291&template=1850622

Documentation for the AutoRoller is here:
https://skia.googlesource.com/buildbot/+doc/main/autoroll/README.md

Justification this is safe: 
useAndroidX which I left in this pr was added in 2018 and is one of 2
flags that control what compile behavior is used as android migrated
from the support library to androidx.
We (flutter android) believe we have migrated all support library usages
to android x.
Android Studio does not automatically insert the Jetifier flag in newly
created projects, suggesting a move towards less reliance on it.

I think even if plugins were using the support libraries this pr would
not break them because the targets being modified are tests in this repo
and the engine build which only uses androidx dependencies.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.

- **Remove jetifiier usages across repo**
Similar to #173459
Related to #173430

Used `grep --exclude-dir=third_party --include=gradle\.properties -rw .
-e "android.enableJetifier=true"` to find usages.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.

- **Remove jetifiier usages across repo**
Similar to flutter#173459
Related to flutter#173430

Used `grep --exclude-dir=third_party --include=gradle\.properties -rw .
-e "android.enableJetifier=true"` to find usages.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.

Justification this is safe: 
useAndroidX which I left in this pr was added in 2018 and is one of 2
flags that control what compile behavior is used as android migrated
from the support library to androidx.
We (flutter android) believe we have migrated all support library usages
to android x.
Android Studio does not automatically insert the Jetifier flag in newly
created projects, suggesting a move towards less reliance on it.

I think even if plugins were using the support libraries this pr would
not break them because the targets being modified are tests in this repo
and the engine build which only uses androidx dependencies.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.

- **Remove jetifiier usages across repo**
Similar to flutter#173459
Related to flutter#173430

Used `grep --exclude-dir=third_party --include=gradle\.properties -rw .
-e "android.enableJetifier=true"` to find usages.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.

Justification this is safe: 
useAndroidX which I left in this pr was added in 2018 and is one of 2
flags that control what compile behavior is used as android migrated
from the support library to androidx.
We (flutter android) believe we have migrated all support library usages
to android x.
Android Studio does not automatically insert the Jetifier flag in newly
created projects, suggesting a move towards less reliance on it.

I think even if plugins were using the support libraries this pr would
not break them because the targets being modified are tests in this repo
and the engine build which only uses androidx dependencies.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.

- **Remove jetifiier usages across repo**
Similar to flutter#173459
Related to flutter#173430

Used `grep --exclude-dir=third_party --include=gradle\.properties -rw .
-e "android.enableJetifier=true"` to find usages.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.

Justification this is safe: 
useAndroidX which I left in this pr was added in 2018 and is one of 2
flags that control what compile behavior is used as android migrated
from the support library to androidx.
We (flutter android) believe we have migrated all support library usages
to android x.
Android Studio does not automatically insert the Jetifier flag in newly
created projects, suggesting a move towards less reliance on it.

I think even if plugins were using the support libraries this pr would
not break them because the targets being modified are tests in this repo
and the engine build which only uses androidx dependencies.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.

- **Remove jetifiier usages across repo**
Similar to flutter#173459
Related to flutter#173430

Used `grep --exclude-dir=third_party --include=gradle\.properties -rw .
-e "android.enableJetifier=true"` to find usages.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.

…tter#173459)

Justification this is safe: 
useAndroidX which I left in this pr was added in 2018 and is one of 2
flags that control what compile behavior is used as android migrated
from the support library to androidx.
We (flutter android) believe we have migrated all support library usages
to android x.
Android Studio does not automatically insert the Jetifier flag in newly
created projects, suggesting a move towards less reliance on it.

I think even if plugins were using the support libraries this pr would
not break them because the targets being modified are tests in this repo
and the engine build which only uses androidx dependencies.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.

- **Remove jetifiier usages across repo**
Similar to flutter#173459
Related to flutter#173430

Used `grep --exclude-dir=third_party --include=gradle\.properties -rw .
-e "android.enableJetifier=true"` to find usages.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [ ] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [ ] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [ ] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.