Skip to content

[Android] Add integration test for setting shell arguments in release mode#178383

Closed
camsim99 wants to merge 81 commits intoflutter:masterfrom
camsim99:shell_args_integration
Closed

[Android] Add integration test for setting shell arguments in release mode#178383
camsim99 wants to merge 81 commits intoflutter:masterfrom
camsim99:shell_args_integration

Conversation

@camsim99
Copy link
Contributor

@camsim99 camsim99 commented Nov 12, 2025

Note

🚧 WIP. Intended to increase test coverage of #177127. Note that this PR currently contains changes from that PR.

Adds integration test (see dev/devicelab/lib/tasks/android_flutter_shell_args_test.dart) for setting Android Flutter shell arguments for apps running in release mode.

Pre-launch Checklist

If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on Discord.

Note: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of Gemini Code Assist for GitHub. Comments from the gemini-code-assist bot should not be taken as authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be addressed.

@github-actions github-actions bot added platform-android Android applications specifically engine flutter/engine related. See also e: labels. d: examples Sample code and demos team-android Owned by Android platform team team-engine Owned by Engine team d: docs/ flutter/flutter/docs, for contributors labels Nov 12, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we have a pattern of adding tests to logic used across devicelab tests?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but this is in the wrong place. When I come back to this PR, I'll move it to devicelab/lib/framework.

the manifest is recommended and modifying the embedding to allow that is
encouraged.

**Note: If a flag is specified both on the command line and in the manifest,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for including this in the documenation. Can you add a regression test for this behavior? Maybe in dev/devicelab/lib/tasks/android_flutter_shell_args_test.dart

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I already included a unit test for this in my base PR #177127, but I'm not against adding an integration test for this, as well. Good idea!

github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2026
…manifest (take 2) (#181632)

A continuation of #177127.
Copying from there:

# Overview

> [!NOTE]  
> This PR is based on conversation & feedback on
go/flutter-android-harden-engine-shell-arguments.

Adds a mechanism for setting Android engine flags via the manifest. If a
flag is specified on the command line and in manifest metadata, the
value specified on the command line will take precedence. Documentation
is added on this mechanism

Additionally, this PR removes the exposure of`--cache-sksl` command line
flag as per
[https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/140310#issuecomment-2708459007](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/140310%23issuecomment-2708459007&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1761156167162464&usg=AOvVaw3a8ubXTtv3apknY2-P9dKe).

Additionally, this PR adds documentation for the only two supported ways
of setting engine flags moving forward -- via the command line or
manifest. The `Intent` mechanism will be removed when
#180686 is completed (intended
to be a follow up to this PR).

As the unit tests in this PR only cover setting flags via manifest in
debug mode, I will follow up this PR with an integration test to test
that flags are appropriately respected/ignored in release mode. See
#178383 for my currently working
but WIP draft.

Part of #172553.

# Follow up work:

## Add integration test for this new added mechanism
This will land as an immediate follow-up to this PR. WIP in
#178383.

## Remove support for setting shell arguments via `Intent`
This task will be a follow up to this work + the integration test
landing, and will complete work for
#172553. See
#180686 for details.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.

If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].

**Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code
Assist for
GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code).
Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as
authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments
useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or
disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team
member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be
addressed.

<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
flutter-zl pushed a commit to flutter-zl/flutter that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2026
…manifest (take 2) (flutter#181632)

A continuation of flutter#177127.
Copying from there:

# Overview

> [!NOTE]  
> This PR is based on conversation & feedback on
go/flutter-android-harden-engine-shell-arguments.

Adds a mechanism for setting Android engine flags via the manifest. If a
flag is specified on the command line and in manifest metadata, the
value specified on the command line will take precedence. Documentation
is added on this mechanism

Additionally, this PR removes the exposure of`--cache-sksl` command line
flag as per
[https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/140310#issuecomment-2708459007](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/140310%23issuecomment-2708459007&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1761156167162464&usg=AOvVaw3a8ubXTtv3apknY2-P9dKe).

Additionally, this PR adds documentation for the only two supported ways
of setting engine flags moving forward -- via the command line or
manifest. The `Intent` mechanism will be removed when
flutter#180686 is completed (intended
to be a follow up to this PR).

As the unit tests in this PR only cover setting flags via manifest in
debug mode, I will follow up this PR with an integration test to test
that flags are appropriately respected/ignored in release mode. See
flutter#178383 for my currently working
but WIP draft.

Part of flutter#172553.

# Follow up work:

## Add integration test for this new added mechanism
This will land as an immediate follow-up to this PR. WIP in
flutter#178383.

## Remove support for setting shell arguments via `Intent`
This task will be a follow up to this work + the integration test
landing, and will complete work for
flutter#172553. See
flutter#180686 for details.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.

If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].

**Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code
Assist for
GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code).
Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as
authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments
useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or
disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team
member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be
addressed.

<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
@camsim99
Copy link
Contributor Author

camsim99 commented Feb 11, 2026

Continuing this in #182241

@camsim99 camsim99 closed this Feb 11, 2026
camsim99 added a commit to camsim99/flutter that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2026
…manifest (take 2) (flutter#181632)

A continuation of flutter#177127.
Copying from there:

# Overview

> [!NOTE]  
> This PR is based on conversation & feedback on
go/flutter-android-harden-engine-shell-arguments.

Adds a mechanism for setting Android engine flags via the manifest. If a
flag is specified on the command line and in manifest metadata, the
value specified on the command line will take precedence. Documentation
is added on this mechanism

Additionally, this PR removes the exposure of`--cache-sksl` command line
flag as per
[https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/140310#issuecomment-2708459007](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/140310%23issuecomment-2708459007&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1761156167162464&usg=AOvVaw3a8ubXTtv3apknY2-P9dKe).

Additionally, this PR adds documentation for the only two supported ways
of setting engine flags moving forward -- via the command line or
manifest. The `Intent` mechanism will be removed when
flutter#180686 is completed (intended
to be a follow up to this PR).

As the unit tests in this PR only cover setting flags via manifest in
debug mode, I will follow up this PR with an integration test to test
that flags are appropriately respected/ignored in release mode. See
flutter#178383 for my currently working
but WIP draft.

Part of flutter#172553.

# Follow up work:

## Add integration test for this new added mechanism
This will land as an immediate follow-up to this PR. WIP in
flutter#178383.

## Remove support for setting shell arguments via `Intent`
This task will be a follow up to this work + the integration test
landing, and will complete work for
flutter#172553. See
flutter#180686 for details.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.

If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].

**Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code
Assist for
GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code).
Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as
authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments
useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or
disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team
member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be
addressed.

<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
rickhohler pushed a commit to rickhohler/flutter that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2026
…manifest (take 2) (flutter#181632)

A continuation of flutter#177127.
Copying from there:

# Overview

> [!NOTE]  
> This PR is based on conversation & feedback on
go/flutter-android-harden-engine-shell-arguments.

Adds a mechanism for setting Android engine flags via the manifest. If a
flag is specified on the command line and in manifest metadata, the
value specified on the command line will take precedence. Documentation
is added on this mechanism

Additionally, this PR removes the exposure of`--cache-sksl` command line
flag as per
[https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/140310#issuecomment-2708459007](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/140310%23issuecomment-2708459007&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1761156167162464&usg=AOvVaw3a8ubXTtv3apknY2-P9dKe).

Additionally, this PR adds documentation for the only two supported ways
of setting engine flags moving forward -- via the command line or
manifest. The `Intent` mechanism will be removed when
flutter#180686 is completed (intended
to be a follow up to this PR).

As the unit tests in this PR only cover setting flags via manifest in
debug mode, I will follow up this PR with an integration test to test
that flags are appropriately respected/ignored in release mode. See
flutter#178383 for my currently working
but WIP draft.

Part of flutter#172553.

# Follow up work:

## Add integration test for this new added mechanism
This will land as an immediate follow-up to this PR. WIP in
flutter#178383.

## Remove support for setting shell arguments via `Intent`
This task will be a follow up to this work + the integration test
landing, and will complete work for
flutter#172553. See
flutter#180686 for details.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.

If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].

**Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code
Assist for
GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code).
Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as
authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments
useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or
disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team
member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be
addressed.

<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2026
…Android manifest (take 2)" (#182522)

### Overview
Re-lands #181632 which TLDR does
the following:

**Same old same old changes from original PR**
- Refactors all engine flags recognized by the Flutter Android embedding
(specifically those previously recognized by
[`FlutterShellArgs`](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/4f5478cce38d837e14b7a032a12500d3fc0f1310/engine/src/flutter/shell/platform/android/io/flutter/embedding/engine/FlutterShellArgs.java)
and all of those used to initialize the engine in `FlutterLoader`) into
a new class `FlutterEngineFlags` (`FlutterShellArgs` is kept for now to
maintain backwards compatibility; see
#182153 for details)
- Adds the ability to set engine flags (that are recognized by
`FlutterEngineFlags`) via the manifest
- Adds warnings for developers that set engine flags via `Intent`s as
this will be disabled as part of
#180686.
- Disallows debug/test only flags in release mode

**New changes/fixes**

> [!NOTE]
> This re-land was required because when previously submitted, it caused
b/483299339. I have confirmed that this bug has been fixed in this PR;
see go/flutter-android-setting-flags-in-manifest-perf-comparison for A/B
test results with the previous version of this PR
(#181632) and commit
d6d4a07
of this PR.

- [Critical change] To fix the bug caught by b/483299339,
`--merged-platform-ui-thread` flag is added to `FlutterEngineFlag`s
- [Behavior change, not critical] To avoid more bugs like b/483299339,
`FlutterLoader` allows unrecognized flags specified by the command line
or `Intent` extras to be used to initialize the engine for now (same
behavior as before my original change but I plan to secure this in the
future; see #182557)
- [Small refactor] To speed up manifest argument processing time,
`FlutterLoader` loops through all recognized `FlutterEngineFlag`s to
check if they are present in an application's manifest versus looping
through all metadata in an application's manifest and looking for
recognized `FlutterEngineFlag`s (small improvement for apps with large
manifests)
- [Small refactor] To speed up command line argument processing time,
`FlutterLoader` processes the `--aot-shared-library-name` flag in the
same loop as the other flags, reducing the number of loops
`ensureInitializationComplete` has to do (minimal improvement perf-wise
but kept it in because it's more readable to me)

### Full description
(Mostly copied from #181632)

> [!NOTE]  
> This PR is based on conversation & feedback on
go/flutter-android-harden-engine-shell-arguments.

Adds a mechanism for setting Android engine flags via the manifest. If a
flag is specified on the command line and in manifest metadata, the
value specified on the command line will take precedence. Documentation
is added on this mechanism

Additionally, this PR removes the exposure of`--cache-sksl` command line
flag as per
[https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/140310#issuecomment-2708459007](https://www.google.com/url?q=https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/140310%23issuecomment-2708459007&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1761156167162464&usg=AOvVaw3a8ubXTtv3apknY2-P9dKe).

Additionally, this PR adds documentation for the only two supported ways
of setting engine flags moving forward -- via the command line or
manifest. The `Intent` mechanism will be removed when
#180686 is completed (intended
to be a follow up to this PR).

As the unit tests in this PR only cover setting flags via manifest in
debug mode, I will follow up this PR with an integration test to test
that flags are appropriately respected/ignored in release mode. See
#178383 for my currently working
but WIP draft.

Part of #172553.

# Follow up work:

- [ ] **Migrate flags all un-migrated flags `FlutterEngineFlags`**
#182852
- [ ] **Add integration test for this new added mechanism.** This will
land as an immediate follow-up to this PR. WIP in
#182241.
- [ ] **Remove support for setting shell arguments via `Intent`.** This
task will be a follow up to this work + the integration test landing,
and will complete work for
#172553. See
#180686 for details.
- [ ] **Only allow known engine flags to be passed to the engine.** This
is more of a P2 but would be a nice additional security feature; see
#182557.

## Pre-launch Checklist

- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.

If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel
on [Discord].

**Note**: The Flutter team is currently trialing the use of [Gemini Code
Assist for
GitHub](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code).
Comments from the `gemini-code-assist` bot should not be taken as
authoritative feedback from the Flutter team. If you find its comments
useful you can update your code accordingly, but if you are unsure or
disagree with the feedback, please feel free to wait for a Flutter team
member's review for guidance on which automated comments should be
addressed.

<!-- Links -->
[Contributor Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#overview
[Tree Hygiene]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md
[test-exempt]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#tests
[Flutter Style Guide]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md
[Features we expect every widget to implement]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Style-guide-for-Flutter-repo.md#features-we-expect-every-widget-to-implement
[CLA]: https://cla.developers.google.com/
[flutter/tests]: https://github.com/flutter/tests
[breaking change policy]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Tree-hygiene.md#handling-breaking-changes
[Discord]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Chat.md
[Data Driven Fixes]:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/main/docs/contributing/Data-driven-Fixes.md

---------

Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

d: docs/ flutter/flutter/docs, for contributors d: examples Sample code and demos engine flutter/engine related. See also e: labels. platform-android Android applications specifically team-android Owned by Android platform team team-engine Owned by Engine team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants