Add textfield perf test to devicelab#51788
Merged
fluttergithubbot merged 1 commit intoflutter:masterfrom Mar 4, 2020
Merged
Conversation
A continuation of flutter#46720
Contributor
|
It looks like this pull request may not have tests. Please make sure to add tests before merging. If you need an exemption to this rule, contact Hixie. Reviewers: Read the Tree Hygiene page and make sure this patch meets those guidelines before LGTMing. |
Contributor
Author
|
@GaryQian : I just realized that your perf test isn't actually running in the devicelab yet... When this PR is merged, can you please keep an eye on the devicelab, and set the initial baseline for the benchmarks? |
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks @GaryQian ! Please help set the baseline in https://flutter-dashboard.appspot.com/benchmarks.html when you have some time. |
This was referenced Jul 21, 2021
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A continuation of #46720