migrate platform channels benchmarks#84066
Conversation
|
It looks like this pull request may not have tests. Please make sure to add tests before merging. If you need an exemption to this rule, contact Hixie on the #hackers channel in Chat. If you are not sure if you need tests, consider this rule of thumb: the purpose of a test is to make sure someone doesn't accidentally revert the fix. Ask yourself, is there anything in your PR that you feel it is important we not accidentally revert back to how it was before your fix? Reviewers: Read the Tree Hygiene page and make sure this patch meets those guidelines before LGTMing. |
| final ByteData? largeBufferBytes = | ||
| const StandardMessageCodec().encodeMessage(largeBuffer); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| final ByteData? largeBufferBytes = | |
| const StandardMessageCodec().encodeMessage(largeBuffer); | |
| final ByteData largeBufferBytes = | |
| const StandardMessageCodec().encodeMessage(largeBuffer)!; |
| ); | ||
| resetChannel.send(true); | ||
| await _runBasicBinary(basicBinary, largeBufferBytes, 1); // Warmup. | ||
| await _runBasicBinary(basicBinary, largeBufferBytes!, 1); // Warmup. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
remove the ! with the change above.
|
This pull request is not suitable for automatic merging in its current state.
|
part of #84014