Should we call this something generic like Linux_android_high_end?

Samsung has both high end and low end phones, so for new contributors it may be confusing

One way is append s10 to make it more clear.
We may have different high_end phones in the future, like pixel. As for low_end, we may also have multiple, like samsung A02, existing motog4.

s10 sounds good to me

Agree with @CaseyHillers.

Cool. Appended.

Should the s10 not also be appended to the tags?

It would be a nice to have. We now use this target tags only for statistic analysis. The tags here is different from the Skia tags, which are being collected in recipes side. One related cl: https://flutter-review.googlesource.com/c/recipes/+/27361.

Added for better info collection.

What are the SkiaPerf tags for these benchmarks? They should also be more specific that just "samsung" for the same reason.

Here is a sample led run to show the tags:

{"arch": "intel", "device_type": "SM-G973U1", "device_version": "android-30", "host_type": "linux", "host_version": "debian-10.11"}

We are using adb shell getprop ro.product.model to tell the device type for all android devices.