Skip to content

fix: breaking summary page dropdown #3764

Merged
pandeymangg merged 1 commit intomainfrom
rnsdk-fix
Oct 15, 2024
Merged

fix: breaking summary page dropdown #3764
pandeymangg merged 1 commit intomainfrom
rnsdk-fix

Conversation

@Dhruwang
Copy link
Member

@Dhruwang Dhruwang commented Oct 15, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

What does this PR do?

Fixes # (issue)
Also fixes sync failing from website type product in rnsdk

How should this be tested?

Checklist

Required

  • Filled out the "How to test" section in this PR
  • Read How we Code at Formbricks
  • Self-reviewed my own code
  • Commented on my code in hard-to-understand bits
  • Ran pnpm build
  • Checked for warnings, there are none
  • Removed all console.logs
  • Merged the latest changes from main onto my branch with git pull origin main
  • My changes don't cause any responsiveness issues
  • First PR at Formbricks? Please sign the CLA! Without it we wont be able to merge it 🙏

Appreciated

  • If a UI change was made: Added a screen recording or screenshots to this PR
  • Updated the Formbricks Docs if changes were necessary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • The "Copy Link" dropdown menu item now appears only for surveys of type "link," enhancing user experience by reducing clutter.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Streamlined the product channel checks in the API, improving the flow of operations without impacting functionality.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 15, 2024 •
edited
Loading

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
formbricks-cloud ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 15, 2024 1:29pm
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
formbricks-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Oct 15, 2024 1:29pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 15, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to the SurveyAnalysisCTA component and the GET function in the route.ts file. In SurveyAnalysisCTA, the rendering of the "Copy Link" dropdown item is now conditional based on the survey type. In route.ts, a conditional check related to the product's channel has been removed, simplifying the control flow while retaining the overall function structure.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/web/app/(app)/environments/[environmentId]/surveys/[surveyId]/(analysis)/summary/components/SurveyAnalysisCTA.tsx Conditional rendering of "Copy Link" dropdown item based on survey.type. Removed asChild prop from DropdownMenuItem. No other significant changes.
apps/web/app/api/v1/client/[environmentId]/app/sync/[userId]/route.ts Removed check for product's channel being "app", allowing further processing regardless of the channel. Duplicated error handling for product retrieval noted.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

bug, 🕹️ oss.gg, 🕹️ 150 points

Suggested reviewers

  • gupta-piyush19
  • jobenjada

🐇 In the meadow where surveys play,
A link to copy, bright as day.
With a click it appears, just right,
Conditional magic, a joyful sight!
In the code, we dance and cheer,
For smoother flows, we hold so dear! 🌼

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 35e4b1f and f03da2c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/web/app/(app)/environments/[environmentId]/surveys/[surveyId]/(analysis)/summary/components/SurveyAnalysisCTA.tsx (2 hunks)
  • apps/web/app/api/v1/client/[environmentId]/app/sync/[userId]/route.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • apps/web/app/api/v1/client/[environmentId]/app/sync/[userId]/route.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/web/app/(app)/environments/[environmentId]/surveys/[surveyId]/(analysis)/summary/components/SurveyAnalysisCTA.tsx (1)

159-166: LGTM! Conditional rendering improves component logic.

The changes look good and improve the component's logic:

  1. Conditionally rendering the "Copy Link" option for link-type surveys is correct.
  2. The restructuring of the DropdownMenuItem follows React best practices.

To ensure this change doesn't affect other parts of the application, please run the following verification:

This will help ensure that the changes are consistent with the rest of the codebase and haven't introduced any regressions.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 15, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏

pandeymangg
pandeymangg approved these changes Oct 15, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@pandeymangg pandeymangg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀

@pandeymangg pandeymangg enabled auto-merge October 15, 2024 13:34
@pandeymangg pandeymangg added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 15, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 0f2f3b1 Oct 15, 2024
@pandeymangg pandeymangg deleted the rnsdk-fix branch October 15, 2024 13:46
This was referenced Oct 16, 2024
Merged
Closed
Merged
Merged
Merged
Closed
This was referenced Oct 23, 2024
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
Closed
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Oct 31, 2024
Merged
Merged
Merged
Merged
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 8, 2024
Merged
12 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2024
Merged
12 tasks
This was referenced Dec 3, 2024
Merged
Merged
Merged
This was referenced Dec 16, 2024
Merged
Merged
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 14, 2025
Merged
12 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Mar 23, 2025
Merged
12 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Apr 8, 2025
Merged
12 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jul 22, 2025
Merged
12 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@pandeymangg pandeymangg pandeymangg approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@Dhruwang @pandeymangg